N A R U v2 wants to enforce the forum rules

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
ammkm3.jpg

 
@N A R U v2 these arguments wouldn't happen if you'd give straight forward answers, instead of posting essays, YouTube videos, articles, and double posting. You can never be straightforward so there's no use in trying to have a real back and forth.
 
I genuinely can't tell if your shitty boomer memes are intentionally misunderstanding my arguments as a way to try and mock me, or if you're actually just too retarded. It's always kind of a toss-up with you, since you're low IQ. I'm leaning towards the latter, obviously.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I've come to the conclusion Naru doesn't understand his own arguments at least half the time. He's just trying to protect his desired conclusion (He wants to be a descendant of Dan) and making nonsense arguments he hasn't thought through in the slightest.
It's also he bombards you with so much information that it obscures a real answer. Getting any answers are like pulling teeth, so what's even the point of asking or debunking anything. He's always got a way of deflecting.
Edit: ie; asking if he's got Jewish ancestry.
 
It's also he bombards you with so much information that it obscures a real answer.

I do have a penchant for unleashing the firehose as previously explicitly noted and implied by my claims of being a repentant child of a prolific lineage of necromancers/Naru; Laplace's Demon.

And on that particularly handy Segway -

No, it's my family reunion arc.

Wait until you meet my cousin twice removed (from church) Gabe Proliferation-Unit Narguyen, who's a Taiwanese double agent posing as a retarded and therefore harmless South Korean double agent posing as a Taiwanese scientist living in their deactivated nuclear enrichment facilities.

Actually it was China uncensored that hit too close to home this time.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=coZDFXpfDdI
I don't like the sounds Habakkuk heard of where this is going.

Technically it's more a selfcest arc.


POV: The Eye of Nauron rests upon ye

 
@N A R U v2 these arguments wouldn't happen if you'd give straight forward answers, instead of posting essays, YouTube videos, articles, and double posting. You can never be straightforward so there's no use in trying to have a real back and forth.

Of course he has Jewish ancestry, didn't you listen? He's a descendant of Jewish-Phoenician Vikings from Ireland, what is unclear?

What nation did the Lord mean when he blessed Abraham?

Genesis 12:1-3

The Call of Abram
12 The Lord had said to Abram, “Go from your country, your people and your father’s household to the land I will show you.

2 “I will make you into a great nation,
and I will bless you;
I will make your name great,
and you will be a blessing.[a]
3 I will bless those who bless you,
and whoever curses you I will curse;
and all peoples on earth
will be blessed through you
.”

Did he mean the biblical nation of Israel? It fell apart when the Northern Kingdom of Israel fell into apostasy and was summarily carried away into captivity.

Did he mean the southern kingdom of Judah? It's descendents were the ones who crucified the messiah they are still waiting for to this day.

Is that what Jacob meant when he prophesied that Dan would provide justice for his people? That Judah would crucify the Christ? But how is that possible when Dan was carried away into captivity by his enemies? Dan is not Judah, nor was he promised the inheritance of Judah.

Could the Lord perhaps have been speaking about the Jewish nation state known as Israel in modern day that was created by the same globalists who are trying to enstate the mark of the beast?

But if that's the case, why would the Lord bless the ambitions of Satan? Satan doesn't bless God's creation. He only seeks to pervert and destroy it. To speak nothing of the precursor to modern globalism that was the tower of Babel and the fate that befell it at the Lord's decree.

🤔

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

I genuinely can't tell if your shitty boomer memes are intentionally misunderstanding my arguments as a way to try and mock me, or if you're actually just too retarded. It's always kind of a toss-up with you, since you're low IQ. I'm leaning towards the latter, obviously.

It'll take someone with a higher IQ than me to figure it out, surely.

1 Corinthians 1:18-31

Christ Crucified Is God’s Power and Wisdom
18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written:

I will destroy the wisdom of the wise;
the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate
.”[c]

20 Where is the wise person? Where is the teacher of the law? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? 21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe. 22 Jews demand signs and Greeks look for wisdom, 23 but we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, 24 but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength.

26 Brothers and sisters, think of what you were when you were called. Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were influential; not many were of noble birth. 27 But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. 28 God chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things—and the things that are not—to nullify the things that are, 29 so that no one may boast before him. 30 It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God—that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption. 31 Therefore, as it is written: “Let the one who boasts boast in the Lord.”[d]

 
Look, retard, I'm done entertaining your schizo babble. There is no tribe of Dan, you're not a descendant of it, you're not Jewish, the Irish are not Scandinavian, and you're not special in any way other than being a sped. I don't care what your hallucinations say about random Bible passages. Read another book,
 
Look, retard, I'm done entertaining your schizo babble. There is no tribe of Dan, you're not a descendant of it, you're not Jewish, the Irish are not Scandinavian, and you're not special in any way other than being a sped. I don't care what your hallucinations say about random Bible passages. Read another book,

Does Anthem by Ayn Rand count?


🧐
 
¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

That video of Pam Bondi butchering justice keeps getting posted instead of the video I just copied for pasting purposes, and I don't have permission to edit my own posts.


Divine Providence or the curse of Timothy Warbergen? You decide!
 
The Call of Abram
12 The Lord had said to Abram, “Go from your country, your people and your father’s household to the land I will show you.

2 “I will make you into a great nation,
and I will bless you;
I will make your name great,
and you will be a blessing.[a]
3 I will bless those who bless you,
and whoever curses you I will curse;
and all peoples on earth
will be blessed through you
.”

Did he mean the biblical nation of Israel? It fell apart when the Northern Kingdom of Israel fell into apostasy and was summarily carried away into captivity.

Did he mean the southern kingdom of Judah? It's descendents were the ones who crucified the messiah they are still waiting for to this day

Could the Lord perhaps have been speaking about the Jewish nation state known as Israel in modern day that was created by the same globalists who are trying to enstate the mark of the beast?

But if that's the case, why would the Lord bless the ambitions of Satan? Satan doesn't bless God's creation. He only seeks to pervert and destroy it. To speak nothing of the precursor to modern globalism that was the tower of Babel and the fate that befell it at the Lord's decree.

Do you believe an almighty God keeps His covenants or does it stop where the human doesn't keep theirs.

What ever you believe about that question gives you the answer.
 
Do you believe an almighty God keeps His covenants or does it stop where the human doesn't keep theirs.

What ever you believe about that question gives you the answer.

Brother, the entire reason Jesus was born to the Virgin Mary and not a direct descendent of King David was because David's line broke the covenant God made with them after God promised the Savior of the world would be born to King David's line.

"How could Jesus be descended from the royal line of David if he was born of the Virgin Birth?

The Old Testament has two distinct methods of claiming kingship. One is by descent from David, and the other is by prophetic or divine appointment. Where did David himself get his kingship? It was by prophetic appointment, through Samuel.

One was applicable to the southern Kingdom of Judah, with its capital in Jerusalem, while the other was applicable to the northern Kingdom of Israel, with its capital in Samaria. The requirement for the throne of Judah was Davidic descendancy. No one was allowed to sit on David’s throne unless he was a member of the house of David. So when there was a conspiracy to do away with the house of David (Isaiah 7:2-6), God warned that any such conspiracy was doomed to failure (Isaiah 8:9-15).

Now, Matthew’s genealogy traces the line of Joseph, the step-father of Jesus. Joseph was a direct descendant of David through Solomon, but also through Jeconiah (see Matthew 1, verses 6-16). Now here, we have a big problem, because Jeremiah 22:24-30 says,

“As I live,” says the Lord, “though Coniah the son of Jehoiakim, king of Judah, were the signet on My right hand, yet I would pluck you off; and I will give you into the hand of those who seek your life, and into the hand of those whose face you fear—the hand of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon and the hand of the Chaldeans. So I will cast you out, and your mother who bore you, into another country where you were not born; and there you shall die. But to the land to which they desire to return, there they shall not return. “Is this man Coniah a despised, broken idol—a vessel in which is no pleasure? Why are they cast out, he and his descendants, and cast into a land which they do not know? O earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the Lord! Thus says the Lord: ‘Write this man down as childless, a man who shall not prosper in his days; for none of his descendants shall prosper, sitting on the throne of David, and ruling anymore in Judah.’ ”
This passage says that no descendant of Jeconiah would have the right to the throne of David. Until Jeremiah, the first requirement for messianic lineage was to be of the house of David. So not only must the Messiah come from the line of David, He must also be apart from Jeconiah. But, as we read in Matthew’s genealogy, Joseph is of the lineage of Jeconiah—meaning, none of his descendants could sit on David’s throne. So then, one must beg the question: how could Jesus be the Messiah, if the Messiah must come from the line of David, but also not be of the line of Jeconiah?

This is where the Virgin Birth comes into play. Remember, Jesus is not Joseph’s biological son, so the Jeconiah curse doesn’t apply to Him. He is, however, Mary’s biological son per the Virgin Birth. But this still doesn’t explain how Jesus is the descendant of David. To answer this, we must discuss Luke’s genealogy.

Unlike Matthew, Luke follows strict Jewish procedure and custom in that he omits no names and mentions no women. However, if by Jewish custom one could not mention the name of a woman, but wished to trace her line, how would one do so? He would use the name of her husband (possible Old Testament precedents for this practice are Ezra 2:61 and Nehemiah 7:63). That would raise the second question: if someone studied a genealogy, how would he know whether the genealogy was that of the husband or that of the wife since in either case the husband’s name would be used? The answer is not difficult; the problem lies with the English language.

In English, it is not good grammar to use a definite article (“the”) before a proper name (“the” Matthew, “the” Luke, and “the” Mary). However, it is quite permissible in Greek grammar. In the Greek text of Luke’s genealogy, every single name mentioned has the Greek definite article “the” with one exception: the name of Joseph (Luke 3:23). Someone reading the original would understand by the missing definite article from Joseph’s name that this was not really Joseph’s genealogy, but his wife Mary’s.

Furthermore, although many translations of Luke 3:23 read: “…being supposedly the son of Joseph, the son of Heli…” because of the missing Greek definite article before the name of Joseph, that same verse could be translated as follows: “Being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph the son of Heli…” In other words, the final parenthesis could be expanded so that the verse reads that although Jesus was “supposed” or assumed to be the descendant of Joseph, He was really the descendant of Heli. Heli was the father of Mary. Ultimately, Joseph was Heli’s “son-in-law.”

Next, remember King David had more than one son. One of them was Nathan. None of Nathan's descendants had any "Jeconiah-like" curses. Mary was a descendant of Nathan (Luke 3:23 and verse 31—remember, as explained above, although the English text says “the son of Joseph, the son of Heli…” since the original Greek says Heli is the father-in-law of Joseph, logically, Heli is the biological father of Mary). Now, Jesus is completely safe from the problem of the Jeconiah curse, all while being from the line of David, and of the Tribe of Judah."


So is your argument that God should annul his covenant with Abraham because of Abraham's wayward descendants, contrary to how God fulfilled his side of the covenant with the Tribe of Judah, in spite of their transgressions?
 
@N A R U v2 these arguments wouldn't happen if you'd give straight forward answers, instead of posting essays, YouTube videos, articles, and double posting. You can never be straightforward so there's no use in trying to have a real back and forth.

BTW, this website has a documented history of harassing its victims into suicide - and of doxxing - which you have previously defended, claiming to be neutral on.

It's also he bombards you with so much information that it obscures a real answer. Getting any answers are like pulling teeth, so what's even the point of asking or debunking anything. He's always got a way of deflecting.
Edit: ie; asking if he's got Jewish ancestry.

Why should I treat you like you're attempting to engage in good faith discussions when you've previously admitted you're perfectly fine with this website being used to drive innocents to suicide?

Much Christian. Very Christlike. What would Jesus do - according to the gospel of @Butwhythough2 - but drive the lost and searching to suicide through abuse?
 
It'll take someone with a higher IQ than me to figure it out, surely.
That's only everyone else in the thread.

Look, retard, I'm done entertaining your schizo babble. There is no tribe of Dan, you're not a descendant of it, you're not Jewish, the Irish are not Scandinavian, and you're not special in any way other than being a sped. I don't care what your hallucinations say about random Bible passages. Read another book,
Without his delusions and hallucinations, Naru's got nothing. It's why he clings to them like they're a life preserver and he never learned to swim.
 
Gods strongest teacher of the law:

That's the thing, you don't bare good fruit, you're wrathful, you're impatient and I don't see these fruits of the spirit from you.

Also God's strongest teacher of the law:

A dox is neutral in nature, what someone does with the dox can be for good or bad. Also "doxing" is one x and not two. Why didn't you throw a shitfit when the phone book companies did it?

I didn't throw a shitfit when the phone companies did it because the phone companies didn't do so for the explicit purposes of targeted harassment and gossip.

"Bible Verses about Gossip and Slander

Everyone has experienced the harm of gossip before. Whether the people talking didn't mean direct harm, the result of gossip is always broken trust and hurt feelings. Gossip can be defined as information about the behavior or personal life of other people, often without the full truth revealed or known. God's Word warns us to stay away from people who gossip and to guard our words when we speak about others!

Scripture also uses the word slander which means making a false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation. Slander can destroy someone's marriage, job, wealth, and family. The tongue has power and we must be careful with how we use our words. The Bible tells us what words we should speak and which we should not. If you are struggling with gossip or know someone who gossips a lot, study these Bible verses and choose to help put a stop to it.

2 Corinthians 12:20

20 For I am afraid that when I come I may not find you as I want you to be, and you may not find me as you want me to be. I fear that there may be discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, slander, gossip, arrogance and disorder.
..."

 
That's only everyone else in the thread.


Without his delusions and hallucinations, Naru's got nothing. It's why he clings to them like they're a life preserver and he never learned to swim.

Said immediately before ageing poorly.

Now imagine the look on his face if ever realizes what Anthem by Ayn Rand is about and how it correlates to me being a non-denominational protestant being targeted by Kiwi Farmers and other forms of modern day pharisees for failure to capitulate to their collectivist world view.


Screenshot_20260316-003018.png
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole