Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    4 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
So he just showed He CAN manage to provide prior case docs when he feels it is important to feed his ego. Interesting.

Untitled.png

He is also apparently capable of providing a current address to the court if he wants to. Truly amazing!
 
Wyświetl załącznik 8690433
Man who got convicted of harassing a woman is upset that he is viewed as dangerous. Lol. Lmao even.
It's worse, it's hurtful. He says that shit so fucking often that you KNOW it was some damn greerlet phrase that got him DEI points somewhere.
Anyone ever had a "minor traffic ticket" have pages and pages of events? Or paid hundreds of dollars in fines and had the case extend over years, with 18 months of conditions, a mental health AND a psychosexual evaluation required?

This is NOT the "equivalent" of a traffic ticket, and providing this detail makes it look far worse than when he merely asserted his characterization.
Found the boring cadamite who doesn't drive like Jehu! If you're not getting restraining orders from everyone nearby in your traffic violation, are you really even trying?
 
As I pointed out.. no, he really isn't.

Also, did Erika move to Las Vegas? Someone mentioned Gree moved to her city, being that thread is thousands of pages I can't find out where that was.
I can't remember if she did. I know she was in Orem and that's where his stalking case was.

He also has a habit of brushing off the entire Erika saga as "a dumb court thing in Orem."
 
As I pointed out.. no, he really isn't.

Also, did Erika move to Las Vegas? Someone mentioned Gree moved to her city, being that thread is thousands of pages I can't find out where that was.
Yes she is a teacher in a school outside Las Vegas. She moved somewhere during Greer's 18 months probation. As soon as he was clear of probation he set off for Vegas.

We have no knowledge that he ever tried to contact her in Vegas. But the timing raises eyebrows.
 
Yes she is a teacher in a school outside Las Vegas. She moved somewhere during Greer's 18 months probation. As soon as he was clear of probation he set off for Vegas.

We have no knowledge that he ever tried to contact her in Vegas. But the timing raises eyebrows.
The problem is, he moved to Las Vegas before he was out of probation. He moved in December 2020, since he was saving up money to move when he filed this case, photos of his U-Haul are in the other thread. Probation ended March 2022.
2026-03-12_10-27.png
 
As is tradition
Turns out supplemental authorities are what separate us from the animals.

The problem is, he moved to Las Vegas before he was out of probation. He moved in December 2020, since he was saving up money to move when he filed this case, photos of his U-Haul are in the other thread. Probation ended March 2022.
Wyświetl załącznik 8691439
A fun tidbit for Hardin to throw into a filing.
 
after greee's response to mr. hardin's recent objection, but just prior to greee's most recent filing, i was thinking about how amusing it would be if mr. hardin filed a motion to compel greee to supplement his disclosures as soon as the discovery stay is lifted. hilariously, greee has now provided incentive and a legal basis for mr. hardin to do so, as the case of which greee has just decided to advise the court is not included in greee's discovery disclosures to mr. hardin.

mr. hardin had no reason to make greee's insufficient disclosures a priority (yet), but greee and his utter lack of legal acuity have changed that. even before the stay is lifted, mr. hardin now has the opportunity both to respond to greee's introduction of the orem case to the record, as well as to comment on the fact that greee has chosen to introduce such information when he believes that it will benefit him (spoiler: it won't), after claiming that he did not have such information when it was requested by the defendants and he believed that it might be of benefit to them.

imagine the seethe if when greee is compelled to disclose not only the orem case, but the sos lawsuit, the eviction, the viatron lawsuit ( ... and however many other legal issues arise between now and whenever the court finally rules on the motion to dismiss and lifts the discovery stay). i, for one, cannot wait for that compendium of cope.
 
A reasonable court would ignore this filing for a notice of supplemental authority is not meant to introduce factual material or character evidence
Not to mention that "minor conviction -> therefore not dangerous" doesn't logically follow
Bottom text
They should ignore it as 'electronic communication harassment'.
 
putting myself in erika’s shoes, if i thought agreeing to be a witness would ultimately result in greer getting the smackdown of his life, i’d be all-in. as far as this case has gone so far, and with the shit-tier, inactive judges? i’d rather not be dragged in. i feel like these judges would also rule that her testimony would be immaterial.

edit: on second thought, maybe her testimony would be considered material, since the cocksnot russell voluntarily introduced the dox about the case?

I wouldn't put it past Greee to somehow list Erika as a witness on his behalf, not Hardin.
 
That first page is classic non-GPT Greer at his finest! Could this signal a return to his original unhinged filings?
GreePT kept fucking up and saying his harassment conviction was literally a traffic ticket, which Hardin pointed out, so he had to write this one himself, maybe after trying a hundred times to prompt it to say what he meant and failing.

Flag of false pretenses might also be a little poetic he waxed and just had to write in
 
As a reminder to any lawyer using AI, in OTG New York, Inc., v. Ottogi America, Inc., the lawyer for OTG was found sanctioned $3,000 for using AI to write his filings (sauce). Since Rustle Russell, by his own admission, is a trained paralegal (which is, in his own words, basically a lawyer), I'm sure he is aware of what could happen if his filings are found to contain AI hallucinations. I'm sure they won't, since he's a trained paralegal who always verifies, right?
 
This fucking mongoloid is about to be homeless and is pouring his energy into his vexlit cases to inform the Judges that his feelings are hurt when people correctly point out that he is a stalker child with boundary issues.

BETTER NOT BE IN THAT CONDO, BOY! :story:
 
A reasonable court would ignore this filing for a notice of supplemental authority is not meant to introduce factual material or character evidence
Not to mention that "minor conviction -> therefore not dangerous" doesn't logically follow
Bottom text
A reasonable court would have dismissed this absolute bullshit years ago, like Judge Tena Campbell did, before the Tenth Circus somehow revived it based on theories of time travel, where publishing a lolsuit threat somehow contributed to infringement prior to it happening.

We're living in a world of idiocy, though.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole