N A R U v2 wants to enforce the forum rules

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Perhaps if you were a bit smarter you'd be able to understand that while the conclusion "Ai Glasses are bad" is similar, it is not for the same reason. I mean I know you're desperate for any sort of win but read for comprehension, man.

Let me see if I understand the gist of what you said here, and feel free to walk me through it in painstaking detail anywhere I am wrong.

What you have just said is: "doxxing is ok when we do it."
 
Let me see if I understand the gist of what you said here, and feel free to walk me through it in painstaking detail anywhere I am wrong.

What you have just said is: "doxxing is ok when we do it."
Nope, that sounds like what you wish people were saying because you're trying to turn the discussion away from your schizophrenia. You might want to calm down before Nate takes your phone away for another week.
 
Nope, that sounds like what you wish people were saying because you're trying to turn the discussion away from your schizophrenia. You might want to calm down before Nate takes your phone away for another week.

I read for comprehension and all I got was this lousy title update.

am27c1.jpg
 
Facebook doxxing bad Kiwi farms doxxing good or nah?
A dox is neutral in nature, what someone does with the dox can be for good or bad. Also "doxing" is one x and not two. Why didn't you throw a shitfit when the phone book companies did it?
I'm trying to write a phone book of my own here for totally above board reasons.
Say for a hypothetical you got @LoverofPi , @Reptilian Infiltrator, @Begemot, @Trombonista and my dox. What would you do with it Naru. I don't believe you'd do anything positive with it. You want revenge for people making fun of you. I don't believe you really care about others, and it's not altruistic that you want to stop people from doxing.

Throughout this thread, you've proven time and time again that you're petty and must have the last word. You're essentially trying to troll shield yourself by acting in the best interest of those that have been doxed. You're a spiteful little man, who hides behind a "noble" goal and everyone can see through it. You're just a whiny little faggot who thinks he's important. I'd tell you to get medicated and stay off the Internet but you wouldn't take the advice.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
How is it this site's fault that you can use shitty AI glasses to dox people? Lmao take your sperging to Facebook.

Say for a hypothetical you got @LoverofPi , @Reptilian Infiltrator, @Begemot, @Trombonista and my dox. What would you do with it Naru. I don't believe you'd do anything positive with it. You want revenge for people making fun of you. I don't believe you really care about others, and it's not altruistic that you want to stop people from doxing.
He wouldn't know what to do with our dox anyway.
 
Do you also believe doxxing is a virtuous past time like the three other Kiwi Farmers above you that are currently engaged in shenanigans?

I'm trying to write a phone book of my own here for totally above board reasons.

@Null has no choice but to vouch for me on that front.
If you think looking at the white pages is a sin then you're more retarded than I originally though.
 
You forgot two letters in your meme. Right at the start of that last word.

This is just like that time when @Trombonista thought I had anything to with Kristi Noam being fired:


See? I'm completely literate.

Say for a hypothetical you got @LoverofPi , @Reptilian Infiltrator, @Begemot, @Trombonista and my dox. What would you do with it Naru. I don't believe you'd do anything positive with it. You want revenge for people making fun of you. I don't believe you really care about others, and it's not altruistic that you want to stop people from doxing.

Unlike this clown who thought I meant I was doxxing people when I said I was writing a phone book of my own, rather than keeping a record of who defends doxxing on this website.

How is it this site's fault that you can use shitty AI glasses to dox people? Lmao take your sperging to Facebook.

Kiwi Farms normalized doxxing, and has fought many a legal battle to defend their doxxing practices, which meta glasses only stand to benefit from.

Hence Kiwi Farms normalizing doxxing.

He wouldn't know what to do with our dox anyway.

I don't even want your personal information. I'm not a social miscreant.

If you think looking at the white pages is a sin then you're more retarded than I originally though.

I'm making a list, I'm checking it twice, gonna find out who's dox worthy tonight!
 

Kiwi Farmers: "We only use publicly available information to identify people, so we aren't doxxing anyone."

Meta: "Our glasses are only accessing publicly available data provided by our users in accordance with our legally binding privacy policy, so we aren't doxxing anyone."

Ubuntu: "We're only requiring our users submit evidence of their publicly available date of birth to comply with anti-anonymity laws, so we aren't doxxing anyone either."

Publicly identified Kiwi Farmers:

am2zie.jpg

I guarantee you that Trombonista does not actually think you were responsible for Noam's firing. You're just bad at reading and don't understand sarcasm, for example.

I'm not surprised irony isn't a 4 letter word around these parts yet, because my deadpan snark continues to disappoint.
 
Everything you do disappoints, Naru. It must be especially vexing to your mother. I'm sure she had such high hopes for you.

An attempt was made/10.

Naru: claims to have mastered its Machiavellian shadow personality

LoverofPi's expectations:


LoverofPi's rug pulled reality:


How Trombonista viewed it (through the lens of a woman moment):

 
Naru: claims to have mastered its Machiavellian shadow personality
You claim many things, Naru. You have given absolutely zero reason to believe them.
On the contrary, everything you do is indelible proof that you are a sad, stupid, petty vengeful little man who thinks he's way smarter than he actually is, and desperate to prove it.
 
You claim many things, Naru. You have given absolutely zero reason to believe them.


On the contrary, everything you do is indelible proof that you are a sad, stupid, petty vengeful little man who thinks he's way smarter than he actually is, and desperate to prove it.

Everything you do disappoints, Naru. It must be especially vexing to your mother. I'm sure she had such high hopes for you.

Woman moment.
 
Unlike this clown who thought I meant I was doxxing people when I said I was writing a phone book of my own, rather than keeping a record of who defends doxxing on this website.
I don't believe you, you've given no reason for anyone in this thread to believe a word you're saying. The context of your own worlds in that other post is that you had a phonebook to make: ie, a book that contains names and addresses.

You're so predictable Naru, you're not Machiavellian, you just watched a bunch of YouTube videos about it and thought "that's literally me." You do the same thing with politics and news, you get them from YouTube videos.

I really don't care meta glasses, they'll fail because people will use them and get into car accidents, run into things, and other accidents involving not paying attention to the environment around them. Were you up in arms when there were physical phonebooks . My point being if someone wants another person's dox bad enough, they'll eventually get it through any means necessary.
 
You still haven't proven Kiwi Farms normalized doxing, and you still can't write it correctly, you fucking newfag.

I'm not being paid to teach you about the scientific study of the process of normalization in sociology, or to point out the fact that Kiwi Farms has now entered the mainstream to such a saturation point that even vtubers like Pippa Pipkin or political commentators like Liberal Hivemind use terminology of distinctly Kiwi Farms origins.

Either make like the more intelligent individual you make yourself out to be than I am and do your own research on the subject as I have done, or pay for a college tuition in which a liberal arts professor can avoid the topic entirely in order to spend the entire semester drawing parallels between orange man and mustache man.

You're so predictable Naru, you're not Machiavellian, you just watched a bunch of YouTube videos about it and thought "that's literally me." You do the same thing with politics and news, you get them from YouTube videos.

am3b24.jpg

If only @Butwhythough2 knew.

 
I'm not being paid to teach you about the scientific study of the process of normalization in sociology,
You could've just said you're talking out of your ass, it would've been easier.

or to point out the fact that Kiwi Farms has now entered the mainstream to such a saturation point that even vtubers like Pippa Pipkin or political commentators like Liberal Hivemind use terminology of distinctly Kiwi Farms origins.
Ah yes, the mainstream: Pippa Pipkin and Liberal Hivemind 🤦‍♂️
 
You could've just said you're talking out of your ass, it would've been easier.

Easier but far less truthful.

"The powerful way that 'normalisation' shapes our world​

19 March 2017
Our perception of what is 'normal' can transform over time – and this can be a force of good and ill.

“My campaign is not going to let Donald Trump try to normalise himself,” vowed Hilary Clinton, Trump's Democratic opponent in the US presidential race, during her election campaign. There were particular concerns around his comments about women, for instance – with fears that it would lead to a greater acceptance of misogyny.

But after his election victory, it was the media that was accused of making these behaviours appear normal. A writer for the New York Times said that, on the day of the election result, “all around were the unmistakable signs of normalisation in progress”, and the New Yorker's editor remarked that he felt like he was “hallucinating” because everyone had “normalised it already”.

Adam Bear and Joshua Knobe of Yale University, who have studied normalisation, wrote recently in the New York Times that people tend to blur what is 'desirable' and what is average into a “single undifferentiated judgment of normality”. They argued that, as Trump “continues to do things that once would have been regarded as outlandish,” these actions are not only being seen as more typical – but also more normal. Our perception of normal doesn’t separate the normal from the ideal. So, as Trump becomes more familiar, he becomes more acceptable to those who initially disapproved of his actions.

Research in recent years has found that many other behaviours and attitudes can be normalised with apparent ease – and not only in politics. In every realm of our lives – whether it's at work or at home – normalisation can have a complex but hidden influence on our beliefs and decisions. ..."


Ah yes, the mainstream: Pippa Pipkin and Liberal Hivemind 🤦‍♂️

Who did Kiwi Farmers plagiarize their legal defense that "compiling information that wasn't deliberately made accessible to the public isn't doxxing" from?

Kiwi Farmers: "We only use publicly available information to identify people, so we aren't doxxing anyone."

Meta: "Our glasses are only accessing publicly available data provided by our users in accordance with our legally binding privacy policy, so we aren't doxxing anyone."

Ubuntu: "We're only requiring our users submit evidence of their publicly available date of birth to comply with anti-anonymity laws, so we aren't doxxing anyone either."

Publicly identified Kiwi Farmers:

am2zie.jpg
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole