🌟 Internet Famous Turkey Tom / TomDark / @NotATurkey / TomDarkLive / anonbirdd / Thomas Larry Hanson - KiwiTuber, "Her Prostate" enjoyer, chronic shitstirrer, Destiny worshipper, pronouns respecter, Mr.Beast bootlicker, serial cheater, cuck, Kiwi Farms induced erectile dysfunction

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Axiom.
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Tom got the W because he has lawyers and Sacramento and Null got the L. That's it.this is why nobody should ever get involved directly with bullshit like this. The waters already been poisoned, and you are drinking from it like cattle.
Tom already had the W based on his receipts. The lawyer involvement now is just him sending a message I'd guess. Which is why the above Tommy C thing is retarded because the message was sent by the sheer fact she had to retract. Wanting to see her brought to poverty is just overkill. Tommy C has only ever been right about two things. Mama Max and Chud Logic. Also he's like fucking 50 why is be still doing this shit
people criticize null for bringing them on his stream, not for allowing them on the forum
Yeah so it's gay platforming crying again. I honestly didn't expect this shit from anyone on a free speech centered website. It's the same shit social justice warriors used. I remember when Pewdiepie had Ben Shapiro on. Oh god he platformed him, he's a nazi for platforming Ben Shapiro oh god. Oh god Joe Rogan must be cancelled he's using his platform for nazis.
 
I for one am happy that Tom is an embarrassing faggot. This whore will spend the rest of her life knowing that she was outclassed, outfoxed, and irrevocably BTFO by an embarrassing faggot who she debased herself for. Every two-bit whore and sniveling "male feminist" should know that even deranged porn addicts and KF-induced erectile dysfunction sufferers are operating on a level far above them. Suffah, bish.
 
ITT
1772681352124.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I for one am happy that Tom is an embarrassing faggot. This whore will spend the rest of her life knowing that she was outclassed, outfoxed, and irrevocably BTFO by an embarrassing faggot who she debased herself for. Every two-bit whore and sniveling "male feminist" should know that even deranged porn addicts and KF-induced erectile dysfunction sufferers are operating on a level far above them. Suffah, bish.
The KF induced erectile disfunction is still by far the funniest shit ever alleged on this thread. Nothing comes close
 
Really love that Katie was upfront about being a bipolar whore and that this was literally petty shit too. Yeah, the girl we thought was a victim fucking lied, but the girl who seems to have told the truth still confirmed Tom is a fucking faggot retard. I think everyone involved SHOULD kill themselves, just so we can get more pages on this thread.
 
1763938054768922.jpg
I think Null's unresolved mommy issues really affects his judgement. Stop acting like a woman and stop interviewing BPD woman out of spite for their ex-spouses. Didn't work for Ethan Ralph nor did it work for Sam Hyde. Also, nigger.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
This is such bullshit because Channing wasn't even talking about herself. She ran with someone else's story and botched it so bad that it doesn't even matter if it was true or not.

It really nauseates me how much pushback there is for talking to people. There's no way I can ever do another interview with anyone again. There's no point. If they say something that's not true it's my fault. It's the exact logic that trannies are going to use when they sue us and tbh we probably won't survive that lawsuit coming up. What is even the point of running this shit when not only does the entire Internet blame me personally for everything said, but the people on this site also burden me with personal liability for everything? Why do I bother?

You should interview the prosecutor that put Bossmanjack in prison so that it comes out later that said prosecutor is a BPD nutcase that lied about everything and Bossman gets his rapsheet wiped clean.

You just need to turn your lemons into lemonade my dude.
 
You should interview the prosecutor that put Bossmanjack in prison so that it comes out later that said prosecutor is a BPD nutcase that lied about everything and Bossman gets his rapsheet wiped clean.

You just need to turn your lemons into lemonade my dude.
 
My last comment on this matter since josh isnt a lolcow (yet) and this thread is mainly for shitting on Tom but I dont get how someone can have basically as much exposure to bad responses and lolcow behaviour as humanly possible and still decides that claiming they didnt do nuffing wrong and anyone should agree with them is the right response. The inability to admit any fault ever is one of the core characteristics of any typical lolcow. Also the responses seem like you want to build a cult of yes-man (not unlike destiny, to defend yourself from "vicious attacks from outside"). If KF gets sued, I would be the first to donate, but pls dont start with the "everyone needs to agree"-bs, that hasnt ended well for soooo many ppl online.

Edit: literally all it would have taken to make 90% of the ppl disagreeing with you stop would have been a "yeah my bad"
Josh is a lolcow, but you kinda have to be to spend so much of your time and energy doing, well, this. "Gaze into the abyss, abyss gazes into you" and all that.
 
Thread is already off the rails so I’ll jump in. I am vaguely reminded of people bitching back when Tucker Carlson interviewed Vladimir Putin—how dare you platform so-and-so because of such-and-such.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with sitting down with somebody, asking them questions and generally letting them talk. It doesn’t matter if you like them, if they’re a good person, if they’re wrong, if they’re a liar. If they were wrong and their words had consequences, make it clear to your audience and call it a day. Talk about lessons learned if you feel like it. But their own words are still just their words. Being responsible for ‘platforming’ is such a bullshit concept. There shouldn’t be a penalty for curiosity.
 
This is such bullshit because Channing wasn't even talking about herself. She ran with someone else's story and botched it so bad that it doesn't even matter if it was true or not.

It really nauseates me how much pushback there is for talking to people. There's no way I can ever do another interview with anyone again. There's no point. If they say something that's not true it's my fault. It's the exact logic that trannies are going to use when they sue us and tbh we probably won't survive that lawsuit coming up. What is even the point of running this shit when not only does the entire Internet blame me personally for everything said, but the people on this site also burden me with personal liability for everything? Why do I bother?

You're correct that they aren't being accurate or nuanced or "fair," but you well know how many people ignore or don't understand distinctions when there's someone to poke or pick at, regardless of reasons not to, especially when it comes to some popular topics.

You have a show. You made a defensible decision to speak to some people. Interviewers are not responsible for the statements of their guests, even if they get apes flinging shit at them for it. Maybe consider neutral disclaimers or something, just to shut down the retards in advance, but if you can get an interesting interview and want to do it, you should.

...
If Null were unethical or a bad actor in this kerfuffle, he'd have removed the whole pile-on and her post today. Instead, he's let people be free to call her anything they want, and call him whatever they want, too.

You gender wars types are cancer no matter what site you’re on.

Null enabling you people was something awful.
What is "bpd whore/ demon/ cunt" and "women always lie and should die," if not "gender war" stuff?

You're a disgusting piece of shit, and people like you are the reason so many women don't come forward after they've been raped. Fuck you, die in a fire you fucking gutterskank.
Incorrect. The legal and law enforcement systems and infrastructure, plus the rabid hordes taking every bad example as proof positive that all women lie and men never did nuffin are what keep women from coming forward.

Let's pretend he actually had raped her, and the evidence was her word and (in the hypothetical) the texts as she first presented them. There is 0.0% chance he'd ever have been convicted of a heinous crime against her.

...

As for "you shouldn't have interviewed them/ it makes you complicit " criticism: Every shitty cow and verified person on this site is being "platformed," in a sense. Good gets are good gets. Was it wrong for James Dobson* to interview Ted Bundy? Or for Barbara Walters to interview Fidel Castro or Saddam Hussein or Monica Lewinsky or Richard Nixon or Michael Jackson (pick your flavor of objectionable person)? Or Geraldo Rivera to interview Charles Manson? Or Stone Phillips or Stephen Michaud to interview Jeffrey Dahmer? You may not like the interviewer or think their subjects don't deserve to be "platformed" - but the interviewers were doing their jobs.

* if you don't know who he is:
James Clayton Dobson Jr. (April 21, 1936 – August 21, 2025) was an American evangelical Christian author, psychologist and founder of Focus on the Family (FotF), which he led from 1977 until 2010. In the 1980s, he was ranked as one of the most influential spokesmen for conservative social positions in American public life. Although never an ordained minister, he was called "the nation's most influential evangelical leader" by The New York Timeswhile Slate portrayed him as being a successor to evangelical leaders Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole