I'm not confident offshoring to maximize profits and importing Dungjeet to perform your job for one-eighth of the salary is a single party's goal
it's openly the goal of the democrats, though. they will tell you, they want to import more third worlders. they will couch it in terms that imply it's a kindness that they're doing because they are such good people. in reality, it's a desire efor slave labor to make line go up. you're wrong and right that it's not the goal one party, because it's not just the declared democrats. there are dozens and dozens of R politicians who will happily import saarjeet and paco to do shit under the table or to take less money, look at how bad it is in texas, after all.
one party has some people who want to stop this, and some people who don't. the other party is openly saying that their policy is to enact mass immigration. i don't understand how you can possibly say that one party isn't focused on devaluing american labor over the other.
It's as common among silicon techbros
yep, and i say all silicon tech bros should be... well okay, maybe i don't say, since that's a fedpostin'.
As for the current Trump policy: it's not that I believe it can't work, it's that I'm not confident it will make a large enough impact prior to 2028.
well i don't really know what else to say. realistic solutions to problems don't magic the fix into the hands of people. i understand that you're not being a doomer or a shitter, and i share a bit of your concern, but that doesn't in any way stop me from TRYING to get these changes made, even if people will fight tooth and nail against them because they're retarded faggots. ultimately i don't know if there IS a policy that just fixes everything in time for 2028, and i certainly couldn't elaborate on it. if i had that answer, i would probably be out proselytizing it to others and trying to get the solution enacted. so far, the solutions that have been presented and put in place are indeed working as you said, it's just that the significant change that people want may not be present in 2028. but in that same vein, i ask you.
what does voting for kamala harris in 2028 get them that voting for JD vance or whoever doesn't? how is voting for kamala going to do what you're asking in a way that voting for trump's successor wouldn't? this feels like a question being asked searching for a specific answer, rather than one being asked from true curiosity.
Wyświetl załącznik 8611887
On the grounds of the feds not doing an "environmental review"
Judicial activism at its finest
do they not know the alternative to this is that we immediately kill anyone we can't deport? prisons are an alternative to the death penalty. you are put in a box away from society to think about what a bad boy you were. in the case of immigration detention, it's a temporary facility used to hold them until they can be properly deported. if they don't get a new facility, they just get put in old facilities that are unfit for the task for whatever reason - usually overcrowding. diseases spread, bad words shared. people killing each other for that kind of shit. unless your goal is to kill all of the people involved, you don't want to force prisoners into tight quarters, it just ends up with a lot of dead criminals.