US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[SpergioLeonne]

So you want to punish those countries by making Americans pay more for goods? Let me guess, you think those countries pay the tariffs. This is why people laugh at you MAGAloids for not understanding how things work

Importing cheap shit so you can displace your own value added processes is what leaves you depending on line go up for revenue. And line go up is usually a “bubble”

Man, what the fuck is wrong with you. Labor unions supported democrats for decades until you all lost the fucking plot

Instead of realizing Sean O’Brien had a point in speaking at the RNC, and the Teamsters had a point in breaking their dem endorsement streak, you probably wrote them off as traitors to save yourself the headache of having to think about where money comes from

 

[Onepumpplumpchump]

Not in this thread you aren't. The posters in this thread have zero opinions or convictions of their own and the opinions of posters in this thread will change on the whims of a mush-brained, pants-shitting child rapist

I agree with you to a certain extent. Im not even doompilling sometimes on here and get pushback to Trump doing something stupid like not firing bondi. But most people in this thread will have a discussion.

 

[Fishmalk Observer]

You don't have the ability to change anyone's mind though, you mush-brained, pants shitting child rapist.

Please sammich, we have no proof that he is in the Epstein files. this is not the TES thread where if you believe it hard enough it just becomes reality

 

[Dorothy]

Which do these apply to?

232 is sector specific.

301 is China.

Administration could theoritically reapply most of it, as Kavanaugh said in his dissent, under those codes.

I am sure Bessent was ready for this.

 

[Mister Fister]

Not in this thread you aren't. The posters in this thread have zero opinions or convictions of their own and the opinions of posters in this thread will change on the whims of a mush-brained, pants-shitting child rapist

You have to threadban anyone who disagrees with you. Why is that you have to cut out tounges? Are you that much of a coward that you're afraid of dissenting thoughts?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

I agree with you to a certain extent. Im not even doompilling sometimes on here and get pushback to Trump doing something stupid like not firing bondi. But most people in this thread will have a discussion.

Not from what I have seen. If you say you disagree with Dear Leader on literally anything you'll return to quotes from a dozen MAGAloids seething with rage.

I once even asked what it would take for them to stop loving Dear Leader and every one of them said nothing could make them stop loving him. It's really weird how they worship him

 

[Gloria The Glorious]

https://x.com/i/status/2024864790594662837

232 and 301 tarrifs still in place.

This won't end overnight either way. Trump might get smug and say they need to cooperate to get them removed. I kinda hope that happens for the lols alone.

 

[ChrisIsGay]

Better start bombing Iran now to distract from Trump SCOTUS defeat.

 

[mlanguishi]

You have to threadban anyone who disagrees with you. Why is that you have to cut out tounges? Are you that much of a coward that you're afraid of dissenting thoughts?

They're just like reddit or DU. 'We love free speech and open discussion, only a MAGA chud would ban over not agreeing with someone' while having a TOS, written or not, that any dissent is permaban on sight. No bound to their double standards and hypocrisy.

He's bitching that we clap back at him like a pussy. They'll do that and ban you.

 

[GettrGriftr]

Supreme Court did not mention anything on the money collected from tariffs. We aren't paying back shit.

I dare say that anyone demanding relief for the money collected will have to queue up at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

 

[MetokurGroomedMe]

Combo of technical difficulties + needed a break. Nice to see you man

I was just thinking about you yesterday too. we were talking about the shroud of turin and the Protestants and Catholics were about to start lobbing IEDs.

I agree with you to a certain extent. Im not even doompilling sometimes on here and get pushback to Trump doing something stupid like not firing bondi. But most people in this thread will have a discussion.

maybe he can fire her out of a fucking cannon to appease the base after this loss.

 

[Mister Fister]

Not from what I have seen. If you say you disagree with Dear Leader on literally anything you'll return to quotes from a dozen MAGAloids seething with rage.

I once even asked what it would take for them to stop loving Dear Leader and every one of them said nothing could make them stop loving him. It's really weird how they worship him

You're a fucking coward who has to threadban.

 

[Troonos]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf

Wyświetl załącznik 8586691
Tarrifs killed. Trump lost

Alright, cool. Now he can focus on getting rid of every fucking non-citizen in the country.

 

[MetokurGroomedMe]

Supreme Court did not mention anything on the money collected from tariffs. We aren't paying back shit.

this was the literal only concern I had. this is a slap on the wrist to force trump to do things a little more by the book, almost the equivalent of wexner's lawyer warning him to stop yabbering.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

It's really weird how they worship him

It’s not really weird if you realize that the dollar has to actually represent something to have value

The ONLY good thing democrats had going for them back in the 80’s and 90’s was that they knew offshoring was bad

You fucked that up spectacularly

 

[CaliforniaRaisin]

The SCOTUS just issued a ruling that has big implications on the US economy...

QUICK! LETS HAVE A SLAPFIGHT BETWEEN HOGAN AND PINK TRIANGLES!

 

[Fishmalk Observer]

I once even asked what it would take for them to stop loving Dear Leader and every one of them said nothing could make them stop loving him. It's really weird how they worship him

Surely you can prove that assertion, and I can laugh at you because I was there and i know you are full of shit

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

This is the only decision the Supreme Court will issue today.

So, does this mean that tariffs are basically reset to what they were before Trump came into office?

 

[HandsomeDan]

You never know, sometimes they'll do things like this, throw a wrench into something that can kind of be worked out so a truly important one like citizenship will be done right. But I'm not optimistic now as much for sure on that.

Im hopeful on this, striking down birthright citizenship is way more important than tariffs if we have to pick one.

 

[Bland Crumbs]

The SCOTUS just issued a ruling that has big implications on the US economy...

QUICK! LETS HAVE A SLAPFIGHT BETWEEN HOGAN AND PINK TRIANGLES!

Right? SCOTUS just ass fucked every single person in the US...again and faggots are celebrating it because Trump lost. Fucking retards.