Is there any solid reason that those freighter planes from china over the last few weeks could not have a hypersonic with a ribbon and a bow on them as a present for Iran to use? Russia passing one to Iran via china isn’t impossible.
Its entirely possible. But what does it change?
The bigger issue would be Chinese missiles, as they are untested (as in they stand a chance of actually working) while Russia's Khinzal and Tsirkon have both been proven largely overhyped in Ukraine and with less-than-ideal accuracy against static targets, much less a maneuvering carrier.
The other issue with Khinzal specifically is that it doesn't have the proven range to hit a US carrier transiting the Suez, and even from the ranges we've seen Tsirkon launched from Russia into Ukraine it'd be a

shot. This is of course, assuming Iran has the aircraft/boats to launch either.
Outside the Suez, this assumes Iran has the targeting to actually hit these.
They don't.
Hypothetically, Russia or China could lend their radar satellite reads and maybe maybe maybe Iran gets lucky and gets a real-time on-station asset to provide precise coordinates of a moving carrier minute-by-minute.
But again this assumes the USN does nothing and let's it happen and doesn't just disrupt the kill chain.
Even assuming these things can hit and sink a carrier, this wouldn't be an open-ocean kill like the risk with China, you'd be hitting a carrier with alternate emergency airbases and allied navies/coast guards to assist with the rescue/abort effort.
Unlike most carrier nations where hitting a carrier results in anywhere from a 33-100% reduction in their carrier force, hitting a US carrier results in a ~10% loss, not counting amphibious assault ships.
As far as attacking static bases in the Middle East, Iran already has and has had this ability, and right now of any time Iran is arguably at its weakest because of the hitting their ballistic missile TEL force took last year (don't count the quantity of missiles left, count how many trucks are left capable of launching them). Adding at best two to three dozen "hypersonics" isn't going to change much.
----
I actually replied to his comment assuming he meant that unlike Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan THIS TIME this guerilla war/hybrid insurgency would be the one the "destroys" the US.