- Dołączono
- 9 Maj 2019
one of the biggest risks i've ever seen (second hand but still) for this whole madness of forcing people to include men in womens' datasets is that it can also completely ruin a study even SEEING that there is something that might be in need of a clinical trial. it can mean that things that would've been spotted in a large population sample of biological women would simply not be there, or could present differently.
definitely it brings to mind how differently the presentation of symptoms and signs are in mental disorders like ADHD and autism between men and women (some of which are biological and some of which are due to socialization) have such massive diagnosis rate differences due to there being a lack of medical knowledge ABOUT the biologically female experience.
i can only imagine what might happen if you included men in a study about something like cervical or uterine health, and how muddled all the data would be, or if you were taking male blood samples and urine specimens and having them labeled female. there was even an episode of seinfeld about this exact thing! elaine uses jerry's much older mother's urine for her drug screening to prove she's not on heroin (poppy seed bagels) and because she used an old woman's urine, her screening also included that she "has the metabolism of a 68 year old woman." and that she might have osteoporosis. while it's a bit overexaggerated, it shows that even in the world of comedy writing, the average person has understood that older, younger, and differently-sexed individuals will have different medical results, screening outcomes, etc.
at BEST, you'd have to run the same program again with biological women only to ensure that the data matched up, and we all know it wouldn't.
please note this is all my understanding of the medical field from living within it since birth, but not having any actual medical degree, scientific credentials, or a job in these fields. just as a layman, it's always been obvious to me that if you have a specific group you're collecting sample data from, and you suddenly introduce another group with no warning and label it the exact same, it's going to ruin your sample collection. please by all means tell me if you think i'm gay and retarded on this one.
thread tax; it's not a specific tranny or anything, but the trannies that go to those big meetings apparently don't like it when other fetish cosplayers show up and start associating fetishes together.
licking the window of self-awareness.
unfortunately for the trannies that don't like it, vegan trantifa activists are here to enforce what is and isn't queer on everybody. don't you love it when your enemies consume each other in a disgusting, dysgenic, and highly dysfunctional self-mutilation ritual? it's all just normal egg-cracking behavior to go from a man addicted to the coom from being humiliated to presenting yourself as a woman and claiming that you're just so heckin' valid you guys (while also engaging in this exact same dynamic of weird sexual fetishization of all sorts of freak-shit that no one in their right mind would consider.)
Ostatnio edytowane:
in their bios can be on the site. Give them a time limit so they can go touch some grass.