US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
ust tell me what im missing, do you guys think the files are made up? think they just dont matter? just dont care? do you guys think you have already seen all there is to see and come to all the conclusions worth coming to? where is USPG2 at on this?
Dems are using it to attack trump, and the repubs, ignoring what harms dems, republicans are using it to attack dems and clear trump, ignoring what harms republicans. It's all about tribal politics.

I hoped it would be used to take down wexnar, black and the other moneyed men who were part of the jewish study group (mega group)

Epstien worked with the cia during iran contra, and been balls deep in all sorts of intel gathering from mossad, to cia/nsa, to whatever the fuck the uk has for an intel agency ever since. Bill Barr's dad Donald (trump's ag in his first term) hired jeffery for the dalton school. Donald barr was a member of the OSS..

This dude has tons of ties to all sorts of shit, and if you really care about it, you should check out Mike Benz's work. Here's a link to one of the couple dozen videos he's done about it.
 
Man the person asking about it is unbearable "you see chud I have tricked you into commiting a racism I am very clever"
I can do some genuine US politics posting that will give you all a little fun history tibit

Ive been reading a FASCINATING book called "The Field Of Blood" (rather re reading) but its just excellent about the physical violence that charactarized congress in the years leading up to the civil war, so much is very intresting about the book but you also get to learn so more "banal" things about our governments process and how it evolved.

The narrator( a first hand source) explains that congressmen called speeches designed STRICLY for the ears of their constiuents back home with no relation to the topic at hand "Bunkhome" speeches, and you imeadtly think "well it must mean BACK HOME" speeches but apparently there was a county called bunkhome and the rep from there was NOTORIOUS for this so the official story is the name came from him.

So just a little fun history, according to the narrative we have ALWAYS had a very quarrelsome political system designed to speak only to the people who are going to vote for you again.

super recommend the book, if nothing else for the Ciley V Graves duel, the only duel between sitting US congressmen that ended with a fatality
 
I can do some genuine US politics posting that will give you all a little fun history tibit

Ive been reading a FASCINATING book called "The Field Of Blood" (rather re reading) but its just excellent about the physical violence that charactarized congress in the years leading up to the civil war, so much is very intresting about the book but you also get to learn so more "banal" things about our governments process and how it evolved.

The narrator( a first hand source) explains that congressmen called speeches designed STRICLY for the ears of their constiuents back home with no relation to the topic at hand "Bunkhome" speeches, and you imeadtly think "well it must mean BACK HOME" speeches but apparently there was a country called bunkhome and the rep from there was NOTORIOUS for this so the official story is the name came from him.

So just a little fun history, according to the narrative we have ALWAYS had a very quarrelsome political system designed to speak only to the people who are going to vote for you again.

super recommend the book, if nothing else for the Ciley V Graves duel, the only duel between sitting US congressmen that ended with a fatality
But Stud the civil war didn't happen how can I know or even believe that there was a united states congress back then?
 
IDK Im reading this stuff and I want to post about it here beacuse its earth shattering shit but most in here dont seem to concerned about it
Most people here are of the opinion that regardless of what is in the files, it's untrustworthy at best and tampered with at worst. We know Epstein was a pedo who acquired homeless girls and runaways for his own sick pleasure. We know he was a rich asshole who rubbed elbows with other rich assholes.

We also know it's those same rich assholes who are running our society, and therefore aren't likely to hold themselves accountable for anything they might have been involved with. You've seen it yourself, evidence that shatters the worldview of someone else but just gets ignored because they don't WANT their world shattered. No evidence will ever be enough OR trusted whether it proves or disproves the case at hand.

I don't read the Epstein files for the same reason I don't read George R.R. Martin: I don't have anything to gain from someone gleefully describing the torture they concocted and inflicted on someone else. We know how the story ends. GoT characters exist only to be killed or tortured. In the case of Epstein, people only exist to exert power on or gain power from. Rape for the girls, blackmail for the men. He never seems smart enough to be an actual kingpin, and if it weren't for how heinous his crime were he'd have made a great lolcow.
 
They wouldn’t be pushing these “if the GOP wins midterms then it’s time for a color revolution” articles if their internal polling was good. We’ll see.
They would actually, It's called energizing your base. Same way Trump says if the GOP loses the midterms he'll get impeached. One side has to be winning yet they both use the same tactics.
 
But Stud the civil war didn't happen how can I know or even believe that there was a united states congress back then?
neither are wizards but I still like Harry Potter ;)


real awnser if you want is the civil war dident happen the way they narrative says it did, its very complicated, I dont know exactly how it all works cause If I did it would already be the accepted narrative.

The more you read the primary sources in the lead up the the civil war you start to realize it just dosent add up, there was clearly some disagreement about states rights and slavery as a whole but the idea they were going to get states like Pennsylvania and Maine and New York to send their young men, their farm workers and factory workers away for 4-5 years to fight for the darkies freedom is ludicrous in the extreme.

The push pull narrative just DOES NOT ADD UP in this humble autistics opinion
 
our brains are geared towards logic and reason
unironically
Wyświetl załącznik 8552804
the reason why women seemingly short-circuit before spazzing out like bondi did come from this
So men are an LLM array where the answer comes from the agreement between different parts of the brain, while women get their answer by watching messages fly between different parts of the brain as they "debate" and summarizing the vibe of the back and forth?
 
Ive been reading a FASCINATING book called "The Field Of Blood" (rather re reading) but its just excellent about the physical violence that charactarized congress in the years leading up to the civil war, so much is very intresting about the book but you also get to learn so more "banal" things about our governments process and how it evolved.

The narrator( a first hand source) explains that congressmen called speeches designed STRICLY for the ears of their constiuents back home with no relation to the topic at hand "Bunkhome" speeches, and you imeadtly think "well it must mean BACK HOME" speeches but apparently there was a county called bunkhome and the rep from there was NOTORIOUS for this so the official story is the name came from him.
For anyone curious about the story behind this:
In 1820 Felix Walker, who represented Buncombe County, North Carolina, in the U.S. House of Representatives, rose to address the question of admitting Missouri as a free or slave state. This was his first attempt to speak on this subject after nearly a month of solid debate and right before the vote was to be called. Allegedly, to the exasperation of his colleagues, Walker insisted on delivering a long and wearisome "speech for Buncombe." He was shouted down by his colleagues. His persistent effort made "buncombe" (later respelled "bunkum") a synonym for meaningless political claptrap and later for any kind of nonsense. Although he was unable to make the speech in front of Congress it was still published in a Washington newspaper.
 
So men are an LLM array where the answer comes from the agreement between different parts of the brain, while women get their answer by watching messages fly between different parts of the brain as they "debate" and summarizing the vibe of the back and forth?
yes
this is how you get them feeling like what they said was right despite it being wrong
unironically, "if you're right why am i mad about it???"
 
neither are wizards but I still like Harry Potter ;)


real awnser if you want is the civil war dident happen the way they narrative says it did, its very complicated, I dont know exactly how it all works cause If I did it would already be the accepted narrative.

The more you read the primary sources in the lead up the the civil war you start to realize it just dosent add up, there was clearly some disagreement about states rights and slavery as a whole but the idea they were going to get states like Pennsylvania and Maine and New York to send their young men, their farm workers and factory workers away for 4-5 years to fight for the darkies freedom is ludicrous in the extreme.

The push pull narrative just DOES NOT ADD UP in this humble autistics opinion
super quick follow up on this to
1770941616135.png
1770941693125.png

I want you to ask yourself if a nation can have
60% casualties
of all their young men and just shrug that shit off hard enough to western expansion?

BTW somehow at the end of the war, the population was still the same amount on the census
1770941847153.png


just to give you context for this, the soviet union lost about 9 million MILITARY personel during the war and only lost 25% of their overall amount and JUST THAT was enough to trigger demographic challenges to this day!
1770941979982.png

so how much more would it shatter a much smaller nation to loose 60% of an entire generation. its so ludicrous we dont have any modern comparison. the soviet union is the closest and you see how out of sync it is.

just some food for thought
 
Trump appointee Jeremy Carl is dropping truthnukes at his confirmation hearing:
vq0rMFJVAmzKeXbM.mp4
He doesn't say he is wrong, just why is it a bad thing.
>trying to collect on debts over 100 years later after 3 government changes
Lol come on now
Goverments inherent the debts of their previous goverments, it is still fair play. Trump is trying to put pressure on Putin by attacking him economically by bombing refineries and capturing tankers. It wouldn't suprise me if the CIA is combing through Russia's financial history and calling up companies with long outstanding debt and having them pester Russia about it. I also bet if Russia comes to the table those debts would be forgiven.
 
Goverments inherent the debts of their previous goverments, it is still fair play. Trump is trying to put pressure on Putin by attacking him economically by bombing refineries and capturing tankers. It wouldn't suprise me if the CIA is combing through Russia's financial history and calling up companies with long outstanding debt and having them pester Russia about it. I also bet if Russia comes to the table those debts would be forgiven
I could see that tbh. I just find it funny is all. You'd think they'd give up or forget after 100+ years
 
Sen. Eric Schmitt speaks on the Senate floor about deporting illegals:
“For all the talk of ‘saving Democracy’ I hear from the other side, it’s all NONSENSE. If they ACTUALLY believed that, they would respect the fact that the American people voted for DEPORTATIONS!”

“DEPORTATIONS WILL CONTINUE. And there’s NOTHING Chuck Schumer can do about it.”

“Joe Biden unsecured the border on DAY ONE and let 15 MILLION people in.”

“The American people saw that, and they voted for President Trump!”“

"No matter how much Chuck Schumer tries to villainize ICE agents, no matter how many times I hear my colleagues from the other side try to stir people up, it will not change this basic reality.”

 
He doesn't say he is wrong, just why is it a bad thing.

Goverments inherent the debts of their previous goverments, it is still fair play. Trump is trying to put pressure on Putin by attacking him economically by bombing refineries and capturing tankers. It wouldn't suprise me if the CIA is combing through Russia's financial history and calling up companies with long outstanding debt and having them pester Russia about it. I also bet if Russia comes to the table those debts would be forgiven.
The problem is the West already broke the rules for how transnational debts, ownership, and finance work. So this literally only matters if China or India pretend it does (spoiler alert: they wont).

Also we should have taken Nulls offer to threadban Stud.

He has become emboldened by his stay of execution. Or he is on new meds that are causing an upswing. Or both.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole