Reposting this from the Epstein-defender and CSAM-procurer's Destiny's thread. Tell me if I'm
:
But to be honest, there are like a thousand different reasons, ranging from the innocuous to satanopaedophilic, why someone might send that email. It does not seem to be an encoding error though, so someone was talking to Epstein about 10 year olds.
The emails with the ages were sent by [REDACTED] with the subject line [REDACTED]. The file in the first email is from a Sony camera. The file in the second email is from an iOS device. Epstein did NOT respond to these emails.
But... just 6 minutes later, Epstein received an email with an iPhone image attachment and the subject line "Pussy". Other subsequent emails in that same time frame had subject lines "Girls" and "Jersey girl". Epstein replied to those emails, requesting "more" pussy, calling it "cute".
Apparently, the DOJ told this user on X that the sender's identity is redacted because they are considered a victim of Epstein's.
Since the sender's email address is [REDACTED], we don't know if it's the same person sending Epstein the "cute pussy" pics along with images of preteens. Or if those first two attachments actually show 10/11 year old girls (or even people, at all, for that matter). "Age 10" and "Age 11" doesn't tell us much on its own. Also, the first attachment is from a Sony camera. This is different from the presumably NSFW iPhone images sent later on.
It doesn't look good though.
* Sony Camera filename
** iPhone filename when you share an edited image
*** default iPhone image filename
Yes, Donald "Poopy Pants" Drumpf personally emailed Jeffrey Epstein requesting prompt delivery of a 10 year old for rapin'!, as per Reddit (archive).Has there ever been an explanation for the "Age 10" email? It looks like it meant "Page 10" but was mistyped.
But to be honest, there are like a thousand different reasons, ranging from the innocuous to satanopaedophilic, why someone might send that email. It does not seem to be an encoding error though, so someone was talking to Epstein about 10 year olds.
The emails with the ages were sent by [REDACTED] with the subject line [REDACTED]. The file in the first email is from a Sony camera. The file in the second email is from an iOS device. Epstein did NOT respond to these emails.
But... just 6 minutes later, Epstein received an email with an iPhone image attachment and the subject line "Pussy". Other subsequent emails in that same time frame had subject lines "Girls" and "Jersey girl". Epstein replied to those emails, requesting "more" pussy, calling it "cute".
Apparently, the DOJ told this user on X that the sender's identity is redacted because they are considered a victim of Epstein's.
Since the sender's email address is [REDACTED], we don't know if it's the same person sending Epstein the "cute pussy" pics along with images of preteens. Or if those first two attachments actually show 10/11 year old girls (or even people, at all, for that matter). "Age 10" and "Age 11" doesn't tell us much on its own. Also, the first attachment is from a Sony camera. This is different from the presumably NSFW iPhone images sent later on.
It doesn't look good though.
| time | from | subject | attachment | content | |
| 8:54 PM | jeffrey E. | Re: Hi | - | Girls at bar | EFTA02450227 |
| 8:59:02 PM | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | DSC06964.JPG * | Age 10 | EFTA01743628 |
| 9:00:43 PM | [REDACTED] | [REDACTED] | FullSizeRender.jpg ** | Age 11 | EFTA01743632 |
| 9:06:38 PM | [REDACTED] | Pussy | IMG_6382.JPG *** | - | EFTA01743637 |
| 9:09 PM | jeffrey E. | Re: Pussy | - | Cute | EFTA02450484 |
| 9:19:26 PM | [REDACTED] | Girls | IMG_6382.JPG | - | EFTA01743644 |
| 9:28 PM | [REDACTED] | Re: Girls | - | More | EFTA02450539 |
| 9:47:47 PM | jeffrey E. | Jersey girl | IMG_6385.PNG | - | EFTA01744660 |
| 9:55 PM | [REDACTED] | Re: Jersey girl | - | No | EFTA02450842 |
* Sony Camera filename
** iPhone filename when you share an edited image
*** default iPhone image filename
Because I'm annoyed that after 10+ years of being called a schizo, you normies have finally caught up. But you're all fucking r-slurred, so you end up doing more harm than good.then it is human trafficking of an adult [n-word], why are u even typing this defense of epstein out in the epstiny thread
Ostatnio edytowane: