US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

Wyróżnienie
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Healthcare will likely go through a bust period once enough of the aging population dies off. The industry itself will always be needed because health problems affect everyone, but the highest healthcare bills people have in their lifetime are when they reach old age. By old age, more prescriptions are used, hospital visits become more frequent, and installations of in-home mobility aids are more common. Then you have the choice of live-in nurses or hospice depending on severity of problems, and money available. Once enough of a threshold of the elderly die off, there will be cuts to healthcare related jobs, as there will be fewer people needing those services. This entire process will probably take another twenty years to come to fruition, but the healthcare industry takes for granted the amount of dying elderly they have, as the only generation to be near the size of the boomers are the millennials.
 
Myrtle the Turtle powiedział(a):
Heres the WSJ recap of the jobs report. The only reason the job market grew was because boomers are dying and need home healthcare aids and related services, plus social welfare services. Thats a pretty bleak picture and not something worth celebrating even if it is native born workers only. The only bright spot is the manufacturing sector has signs it's starting to blossom.
Wyświetl załącznik 8548051
https://www.wsj.com/economy/jobs/january-jobs-report-unemployment-b703b0e3 | https://archive.is/9gdEO

If your engine of job growth is the need for home health aids, thats not healthy robust growth, and its certainly not going to bring about a 'golden age' for Americans.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
The spike in jobs for health services as boomers age has been predicted for a while and they are needed. Putting more market pressure to improve the wages of medium skilled jobs like these is overall good in my opinion especially if the goal is reindustrialization and bringing manufacturing back to the US where there otherwise may be some pain as costs rise but it takes time for jobs and pay to follow.
 
JambledUpWords powiedział(a):
Healthcare will likely go through a bust period once enough of the aging population dies off. The industry itself will always be needed because health problems affect everyone, but the highest healthcare bills people have in their lifetime are when they reach old age. By old age, more prescriptions are used, hospital visits become more frequent, and installations of in-home mobility aids are more common. Then you have the choice of live-in nurses or hospice depending on severity of problems, and money available. Once enough of a threshold of the elderly die off, there will be cuts to healthcare related jobs, as there will be fewer people needing those services. This entire process will probably take another twenty years to come to fruition, but the healthcare industry takes for granted the amount of dying elderly they have, as the only generation to be near the size of the boomers are the millennials.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Unless birth rate trends reverse, this is going to be the New Normal™ going forward. The Boomers are bigger than Gen X, which is bigger than the Mellenials, who outnumber Zoomers. If it's even possible to reverse the trend, you'll still have to go through 20+ years of economic contraction before a potential larger, younger generation takes over.

They claimed infinity browns would fix this, but they just all hopped on welfare and started sucking cock too, contributing to both the parasite problem and the aging population problem.
 
quick break from all this politics to bring you some random bullshit

this jew has got himself an 80 pound bar of silver recovered off the bottom of the Atlantic after it was sunk by a Uboat in 1941 while on a allied warship

here is the kicker, he is telling his audience its going to be melted down unless one of them buys it.

What a guy.

 
Ostatnio edytowane:
quaawaa powiedział(a):
Trump shitting all over shitty governors:
Wyświetl załącznik 8548069
Source
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Ya, fuck Newsom, fully. Gas here, on base, has gone up over forty cents a gallon for regular over the last three weeks, due to a refinery closing thanks to that cocksucker Newsom. Was $3.85, now $4.28 as of this morning.

Got these today.

1770851735809.png

1770852023348.png
The updated and improved version.

1770852146617.png
Neither do I, Mr. President.


1770852290954.png


1770852319754.png

What a nasty little cunt.
 
The Big A powiedział(a):
If it's even possible to reverse the trend,
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Thats not gonna happen because in order to do that, you have to defy the mantra of "line must always go up" an make companies pay and hire more so people can afford families to start having kids, likely at the cost of stock growth, at least in the short term. No one has the balls to do this so were going to slog along until the system painfully corrects itself.
 
The Big A powiedział(a):
They claimed infinity browns would fix this, but they just all hopped on welfare and started sucking cock too, contributing to both the parasite problem and the aging population problem.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Infinity browns isn’t even a long term solution. It operates like a giant scam:
  1. Have infinity browns come to the US to take jobs Americans won’t do (because the executives refuse fair pay and treatment)
  2. Pay those infinity browns so little they rely on tax money from citizens to even stay there
  3. Have those citizens keep losing jobs to infinity browns because it’s “money saving”
  4. Politicians panic that there’s a lack of tax revenue because of people not being able to work (and therefore can’t pay taxes)
  5. Those citizens out of work eventually have to get government assistance just to survive
  6. Politicians panic again because they aren’t getting enough money to pay gibs to the infinity browns and citizens forced out of work
  7. Politicians decide to raise taxes again on the citizens that can work, which means less money can be spent on whatever cheap products corporations are shilling (and said products relying on cheap and/or outsourced labor)
  8. The corporations see dips in profits because there are a lack of people able to purchase the product. As a solution, they shrink the product while keeping the cost the same in desperation to get profits to please shareholders
  9. This cycle just repeats until no one can afford anything, and the infinity browns eventually try to flee the massive economic downturn. Meanwhile, the people that promoted the infinity browns won’t see where they went wrong, as it’s easier to just call people “racist” for wanting a stable career and a bit of extra spending money
 
Myrtle the Turtle powiedział(a):
Thats not gonna happen because in order to do that, you have to defy the mantra of "line must always go up" an make companies pay and hire more so people can afford families to start having kids, likely at the cost of stock growth, at least in the short term. No one has the balls to do this so were going to slog along until the system painfully corrects itself.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
The economy has been flooded with Jeet / Asian MBA's who's entire curriculum their degree was based on was "How To Increase Bottom Line and Shareholder Value". It's had it's predictable effects on the enshitification of everything in service of just that.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole