US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
They're already trying to do that.
They already have. How many retards arguing against the age of consent or the push for the term "MAP"/hebephile or whatever.
Fortunately there's an instinctive limit in actual humans (who still outnumber the perverts for now) to tolerance levels. Troons almost had it made, but couldn't stop violently raging in public over pronouns and (fatally, as far as the "movement" goes) perving out in women's (and girls') locker rooms.

It was already borderline that they'd managed to push grooming onto their own children but the moment they crossed the line trying to fuck with other people's kids (beyond peddling pills and surgery), that was it.

The universal response to somebody arguing against age of consent laws is "get the fuck away from my children while I load my shotgun." Same with that "minor attracted persons" bullshit -- there's no getting around what you're trying to claim, and people viscerally hate it and want to kill you for it.

They can "push" for what amounts to pedophilia all they like. The pushback is natural, inevitable, instinctive and visceral. There's no getting around it.

Note I'm referring to Whites here, not savages. I don't care what muzzies and Somalians do to their offspring. We have higher standards, despite our various flaws. Muzzies celebrate Mohammads for raping kids. We celebrate Plauchés for killing pedophiles.
 
The sodomy lottery
The booty buffet
Truly insane that the president of the United States posted a video of two famous black people as apes… and the general response from Republicans is “Yeah, that’s just typical Trump… by the way he’s totally not racist, name ONE racist thing Trump has done!!!”
Isn't that what Roseanne got canceled for? She posted that picture of that chick that looked like planet of the apes, even though that bird looked exactly like the planet of the apes?
Note I'm referring to Whites here, not savages. I don't care what muzzies and Somalians do to their offspring. We have higher standards, despite our various flaws. Muzzies celebrate Mohammads for raping kids. We celebrate Plauchés for killing pedophiles.
We all knew you were referring to humans not subhumans.
 
Truly insane that the president of the United States posted a video of two famous black people as apes… and the general response from Republicans is “Yeah, that’s just typical Trump… by the way he’s totally not racist, name ONE racist thing Trump has done!!!”
You’re on a forum where people are proud to be racist. I mean it’s awful, apes shouldn’t be compared with niggers. That’s insulting the apes.
 
Truly insane that the president of the United States posted a video of two famous black people as apes… and the general response from Republicans is “Yeah, that’s just typical Trump… by the way he’s totally not racist, name ONE racist thing Trump has done!!!”
This is a great example of how the programming can kick in, even in places like these and it shows how effective it is. If you are a nigger, it doesn't matter what you do, someone being racist to you will always be worse.
 
This is a great example of how the programming can kick in, even in places like these and it shows how effective it is. If you are a nigger, it doesn't matter what you do, someone being racist to you will always be worse.
That and getting so upset about the implied comparison is basically just admitting it's accurate. The whole reason people hate stereotypes is because they're usually right and it gets under their skin.
 
That and getting so upset about the implied comparison is basically just admitting it's accurate. The whole reason people hate stereotypes is because they're usually right and it gets under their skin.
Stereotypes exist for a reason. It's the reason that nobody walks up to a group of Hell's Angels and asks them what the score was of the women's volleyball match yesterday.
 
That's a scary thought but it's true. First they normalized gay marriage. Immediately after that they went to work on trying to normalize and protect troons like they were an endangered species.
How long before they try to normalize pedophilia under the guise of it being a queer identity?
It'll be locked in if the various critical studies departments decide to start promoting it and successfully make young women feel sorry for pedos. Each facet of insanity, from letting niggers rampage on the subway to letting troons jerk off in the ladies' room, has the roots of its political power planted by a stream of feminine maternal instincts redirected to sociopaths instead of their own children (ick! children! they ruin your life!).

Once you have single women locked in, the triumph of your cause is inevitable. Single women are in charge of all our institutions of social control, particularly HR departments, university ethics boards, nearly the entire civil rights legal apparatus, and a good chunk of the judiciary. Moreover, they serve as center of gravity in elections. If single women support something the left wants to do, this affects primary outcomes in the Democratic Party and drives turnout in the general.

All this said, while single women have proven to be so psychologically malleable as to be manipulated into supporting letting nigger rapists rape whoever they want, pedos might be too tough a sell for them. You can talk about troons and niggers without actually directly calling attention to their propensity to rape, but with pedophiles, it's baked into the definition. Single women don't really care for rape or feel sorry for rapists as such. They feel motherly instincts toward niggers as long as the niggers are portrayed as cute little pets, not vicious criminals. I don't think the same can be done with pedos.
 
That's a scary thought but it's true. First they normalized gay marriage. Immediately after that they went to work on trying to normalize and protect troons like they were an endangered species.
How long before they try to normalize pedophilia under the guise of it being a queer identity?
I honestly think we thwarted that with that detransitioner lawsuit. Their angle was going to be: if kids can consent to these surgeries and to decide their sexual IDENTITY, then surely they are cognizant enough to consent to sexual RELATIONS.

They may still try to go hard with MAP angle, but I think people are pulling back hard now. Even and especially with everything under the sun being labeled as pedophilia. It's part of this most recent panic like back in the 80's when everything was Satanic (history does rhyme!)

I lived through that as a teen so I vividly remember it as an old metalhead who liked to stir the 'ol pot in high school - me and my friends got in the news because we pushed back on our school banning pentagram imagery under freedom of religion lol; yes we were very cringe, but it was fun and Rainbow is a great band.
 
It'll be locked in if the various critical studies departments decide to start promoting it and successfully make young women feel sorry for pedos. Each facet of insanity, from letting niggers rampage on the subway to letting troons jerk off in the ladies' room, has the roots of its political power planted by a stream of feminine maternal instincts redirected to sociopaths instead of their own children (ick! children! they ruin your life!).

Once you have single women locked in, the triumph of your cause is inevitable. Single women are in charge of all our institutions of social control, particularly HR departments, university ethics boards, nearly the entire civil rights legal apparatus, and a good chunk of the judiciary. Moreover, they serve as center of gravity in elections. If single women support something the left wants to do, this affects primary outcomes in the Democratic Party and drives turnout in the general.

All this said, while single women have proven to be so psychologically malleable as to be manipulated into supporting letting nigger rapists rape whoever they want, pedos might be too tough a sell for them. You can talk about troons and niggers without actually directly calling attention to their propensity to rape, but with pedophiles, it's baked into the definition. Single women don't really care for rape or feel sorry for rapists as such. They feel motherly instincts toward niggers as long as the niggers are portrayed as cute little pets, not vicious criminals. I don't think the same can be done with pedos.
Fucking SPOT ON, fella. They will use women and manipulate their emotions to normalize pedophilia. And then the left will join in on it because we hate it so much. After that everyone else will go along to get along.
People may say "But wait a minute, American guy with the retarded wallaby accent! I understand how they could convince white women to feel sorry for niggers, but there's no way that women are stupid enough to allow adult men to start raping children!"
My retort to that would be look at abortion. Women are so fucking stupid that all it took was somebody telling them that they don't need no man to tell them what to do with their body, and now they fight like hell to kill their own life growing inside them.
They will murder their own children in the womb because they were brainwashed into thinking it was a god given right, I don't think that they are intelligent enough to not be talked into letting men fuck the ones that they don't kill off.
 
No one can convince me Billy Eilish is not half fish, i have no proof but no doubts either, check her DNA.
BillieEyefish.jpg
Can guarantee they don't give a fuck about the half-time show, and might actually leave until the game starts back up. It's a nobody that's there for DEI purposes. That or they'll be booing constantly, we all know it's going to be a shitshow anyway. Seriously, this has got to be the most stupid fucking thing they've done.

Might as well go while the NFL slowly crashes and burns.
I spent a year playing the organ for a national hockey team (I won't name them so I don't get hit with TMI stickers lol). I used to have to wear a headset and they would tell me when I can play and when to stop. For example, when the broadcast went to commercial, they'd tell me to play. When they were coming back from commercial, they'd start counting down in my headset and it was up to me to wrap it up. I could choose what to play, but the when was always up to them.

One time, one of the teams calls a time out. Someone in the office had the big brain idea to tell me to play during the time out, so they chime in my headset and tell me to play. I start playing and somehow it was interpreted by the fans that they were keeping the teams from playing so I could play the song. Literally like they had called a time out so I could play. I'll tell you this - you haven't lived until you've been booed by 15,000 people. My girlfriend was in the crowd (I used to get her comp tickets) and she said some guy in front of her was screaming, "YOU SUCK!" at the top of his lungs.

Within seconds, the dude in my headset popped back in yelling, "Bad idea! Bad idea!! STOP PLAYING NOW!" I stopped and the booing stopped immediately. Then the game continued as planned.

If I learned anything it's that - I assure you - fans of whatever team - Islanders, Flyers, Red Wings, etc. absolutely do not give a rat's fucking ass about any of the frou-frou shit, including the organist, and if they think anything is getting in the way of the actual game, they will riot. I'm pretty much in agreement that sportsball fans probably give as little shit as possible about the halftime act and if it was completely removed, they'd probably be much happier.

Not always, check out nissan.com
Lol I'd love to know the story behind that. Maybe Nissan didn't give enough of a shit to take the name back. A lot of companies were slow to register their names which is why so many people were cyber-squatting. I mentioned Panasonic specifically because I remember being the first case I had heard of, where a big brain registered it and tried to extort Panasonic over it, and Panasonic just had their lawyer rub his balls all over the dude's face and take the name.
Her copyright application:
Just want to mention, as I have experience with this - that's a trademark application, not a copyright application. Very big difference.

Copyright is pretty easy - I write stuff for TV and shows and copyright constantly. Copyright you just upload your song, file your paperwork and pay the $50 fee and it's copyrighted.

Trademarking something is completely different. She'll never get the trademark.

One time when I was hired to write a musical, I invented a word used in the musical and trademarked it. First of all you can't just trademark a normal word like "Birthday" and then try to extort money from every greeting card company. You can only trademark a newly invented word (Like how Verizon is made up of Veritas+Horizon) or a phrase that uses a specific combination of normal words. Like how GE Light Bulbs has the tagline - "We bring good thing to life". They can trademark that phrase, which is a unique combination of words, but they can't trademark a single, common word like "life".

Anyway, I had invented a word and so I wanted to trademark it. Right off the bat you have to get a trademark attorney to file the paperwork. The very first thing the trademark attorney will do is an actual trademark search to make sure the thing you want to trademark hasn't been trademarked before because it's illegal to try to trademark something that's already trademarked. Of course that costs a nice amount. If you pass the trademark search, then the trademark attorney will want to file paperwork for it and submit it. Once the paperwork is filed, you get put in a queue where eventually your paperwork gets looked over by someone at the trademark office.

At his point I was already $2,000 in the hole with the attorney and this is just to do the search and file the paperwork. This in no way guarantees that I will be awarded the trademark. I can be rejected and that's that. After they overlook your trademark application, (and this is where her plan falls down) they will request actual, physical proof of usage of your trademark in order to consider it. So in my case, since I was trademarking a word, I had to provide actual physical proof I was using the word. If I remember correctly, they needed three different usages. I had to provide huge promotional concert posters with the word on it, the playbill for the musical with the word mentioned in it, and copies of the lyrics of the songs where it was used. These were physical items I had to have printed up and provided to the trademark office. Then it goes before a committee and they actually rule on whether I have provided strong enough usage to award me a trademark for my word.

As a side note, I wanted to provide merch like shirts with the word on it, but I couldn't because using the word on "apparel" is a completely different trademark! The trademark I was applying for was solely for print media. If I wanted to use the word on merch, I'd have to file for an additional trademark for usage on apparel and go through the whole thing again, and provide merch with the word on it! You can see how quickly this becomes a bureaucratic nightmare. Literally government nickel and diming you to death.

This is in stark contrast to a copyright, where you can copyright whatever the fuck you want just by uploading it to the copyright website and paying their paltry fee.

Now here's the kicker - if / when you get awarded your trademark, you have to keep using it because if you stagnate on it, you will lose it. In my case, just before the musical opened, everything came crashing down. The chick who wrote it was some BPD nutcase, completely raided the bank account for the show, stole everything, and disappeared and the whole show never even got to open. I no longer had a use for the word and just let it sit there. About a year later I had checked the trademark site and looked myself up and indeed, the trademark office had marked my trademark "inactive" and had revoked it and I lost my trademark because I wasn't using my trademark. What a waste of fucking money.

TL;DR: This chick is batshit. She will never be awarded a trademark for something she can't provide physical evidence that she even owns. She's literally wasting her money, and everyone's time to get some temporary internet ass pats from liberals.
 
This normalization and sanitization of pedophilia to not mean child abuse, and the slap on the wrist punishment of statutory rape if the perpetrators were rich is how you get a "pedophile rights" movement
The term is "MAP Pride," bigot
1770387501741.png
"Did you hear that Disney just announced their new movie will have their first pedo kiss?"
They already did that in Blank Check
 
We need more then a needle. If you are found conclusively to be guilty of sexually abusing a minor there needs to be like draconian level of punishment that includes death like make these sick fucks suffer. They need to be scared for things to change its the only way shit like this stops happening.
Then they'll argue the classic "Tough on crime sentences and the death penalty were proven not to work as deterrents in drug-related cases!" talking point.
 
My retort to that would be look at abortion. Women are so fucking stupid that all it took was somebody telling them that they don't need no man to tell them what to do with their body, and now they fight like hell to kill their own life growing inside them.
Abortion was a very easy sell to single women, because it was advertised as a way to have fewer responsibilities, buy more cute shoes, and avoid accountability.

Fags were a tougher sell. For decades, women saw fags as perverts who ruined each others' shitters with weird, damaging sex. Once fags got reframed as fun-loving fellas who adore fashion and are dying to be a white woman's pet, and their #1 problem switched from how much AIDS they give each other to getting tormented by mean homophobes who can only be stopped by white women, the movement became successful.

Troons were likewise a tough sell. Once they got portrayed as ultra-faggy faggots who get extra-bullied, women got on board. The mood's only shifted because the average troon isn't a megafaggot, he's a malicious pervert who wants to steal your tampons and put them in his ass while he jerks off.

The blackpilling part is that women are in control. The only reason we've had to endure troons is female HR lady support. The only reason we think there's a light at the end of the tunnel is we think women might finally be turning against them. The core premise that we should get women's permission before protecting society from a threat remains unquestioned.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole