💥 Trainwreck Anisa Riyadh Jomha / @anisajomha & iDubbbz / Ian Kane Jomha / Ian Kane Washburn / "Anisa's husband" / Scorched Legume / "Poo-Pants Swastika Boy" - Anisa posting her bald nudes on OnlyFans even when married to Ian and thirsting over Hasan while her husband iDubbbz the Content Cuck/Simp/THE RAPED/ etc. watches

How Long Will Anisa Continue to Stream?

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    661
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Wyróżnienie
Ian "Cain" Jomha? Yet another case of nominative determinism?
iancainjomhas.jpg
Is his mark of cain his shit pants?
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
AGL Blue Bros powiedział(a):
Ian has at best one more big collab stream with these guys before he's totally cut off. He's trying to join naturally decisive group with a big target on his back, it doesn't matter when he's doing people will show up just to alog him. He's got no energy, no experience in politics, and nothing interesting to say about anything. His community is almost as bad as the aloggers it seems if not worse in them trying to take control. What benefit is there in having him around?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
In my opinion, he'll do plenty more collabs with other fellow bottom-of-the-barrel H3 snark streamers.

I think that the favorites of H3 snark like Hasan and Denims will never ever mention the Jomha couple ever again, let alone interact with them. Say what you will about them (I agree they are retarded), but they are semi-smart business people who actually pull views and make money. They have clout and a big fan base, so they have a lot to lose by making shitty business decisions. Associating with Idubbbz would be a net loss, since it wouldn't bring in a new audience (Ian's followers already watch Denims and Hasan) and it would tarnish their names by associating with someone that even people from the normie-sphere enjoy calling a cuck.

Hell, even Hasan had a come-to-Jesus moment when he learned that Idubbbz won LOTY. Like, "Did I really let that cuck suck off my microphone?". I think that, in that moment, Hasan realized that he ought to choose his attack dogs more carefully, lest he be associated with a massive flop like Ian's Content Cop. I'm sure he never watched that video, but I'd bet he at least skimmed through the comments and knows that the reception was horse shit. Even Noah Samson noped the fuck out of the stream as soon as Ian joined.
These people, although fervent H3 haters, have enough of a brain to know that Ian and Anisa's public image is completely wrecked, and rightfully so.

Now, people like CWHM, Uma_Palma and the likes will continue to associate with him. For one, Uma gets on average 30 viewers per stream, and CWHM averages 50, so Ian's fanbase is actually bigger (LOL). Plus, I think that they're dumb enough to associate with anyone that says "Ethan Klein BAD", no matter how big of a shit-sitting retard that person actually is. This is the snarker mentality that they all share - you can be a pedophile serial killer, but if you hate H3, you're a "good person".
Besides, all three of them share the exact same fanbase like Obee, itsaho69, Sxarbo, MadelineF1, Mudfoot and the likes, who I'm sure suggest collabs all of the time - Han and itsaho69 mentioned it on yesterday's collab stream, so I'm sure they talk about it frequently.

2:05:15 | @itsaho69: @han_9999 ythink we could get ian to do a joint stream with uma and madison again and have them do the minecraft minigame servers? lmao
2:05:30 | @han_9999: @itsaho69 maybe! i kinda doubt it tho hes really not into minecraft
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
2:06:44 | @han_9999: @itsaho69 we're trying to get REPO going with the mods, scheduling's just been in the way. that'll be a really fun friendslop for stream
2:07:11 | @itsaho69: @han_9999 oh!! good idea!!! they sounds fun :)
2:07:39 | @han_9999: @itsaho69 so fun!! i wonder if we can get anisa to play too, that'd be sick
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

So, if I'm not mistaken, we'll get more collabs with utterly retatded, strange and delusional people. Just not with anyone remotely big.
I'm also going to bet that Han will be a moderator next stream, so we won't see another nugget of gold like yesterday's anytime soon. Ian is the biggest creator after all, I'm sure he'll leverage that (ie. Han will force him to do it) and will say that the stream was full of CrEePs and WeIrDoS, and only top janny Han can handle it.

EDIT: Formatting and spelling cuz retard
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Bifocal Lens powiedział(a):
So, if I'm not mistaken, we'll get more collabs with utterly retatded, strange and delusional people. Just not with anyone remotely big.
I'm also going to bet that Han will be a moderator next stream, so we won't see another nugget of gold like yesterday's anytime soon. Ian is the biggest creator after all, I'm sure he'll leverage that (ie. Han will force him to do it) and will say that the stream was full of CrEePs and WeIrDoS, and only top janny Han can handle it.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I hope we get the Janny Wars if so. Lord knows it doesn't take much to get these retards to infight. Some new bitch as annoying as Han getting great power will surely piss some other janny off.
 
Bifocal Lens powiedział(a):
Once again, they also confirmed that they constantly check the r/imisstheoldidubbz and this thread (Hi!). Yesterday, Han was going on about someone "posting KF references" and I don't even know what the fuck that means, so she must spend all her time here reading up on the lore.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling knowing Han has read my words of encouragement to keep her golden broom sweeping :)
 
shoashuffle powiedział(a):
Ian 'The worlds most raped man' Johma continues to fucking lose at everything. The troon boxer has admitted he is a man.

Wyświetl załącznik 8523233

A thread detailing the confession with articles included.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
UGGGHH... these fuggin... weird LOSERS are acting like this is a big deal..... like, they totally missed the point of the video..... fuggin, i was saying... that shes a fuggin woman, because she says shes a woman.... you have to be a real creep to care about fuggin.... uhh, whats the word again.... chat can you help me out..... oh right HYEH HYEH HYEH thanks han.... uhh chromosomes and shit.... like, who gives a fuck....
 
I fully expect this to have been discussed in some detail before, but is there anything to suggest that Ian is actually in love with Anisa? It is fairly convincingly established that they do not have sex, at the bare minimum.

I think it's actually pretty clear that Anisa is infatuated, just not with Ian, but instead with the mere idea of being with someone. With Ian, though, I don't know if one often sees him really express anything in this direction beyond asserting it in speech. He'll say he loves her, but I don't think I have seen him show it. More than anything, they act basically just like strangely malformed and ill-fitted friends, or simply people who don't quite fit but who have known each other a long time. Is there anything in their shitty podcast that suggests he actually has romantic feelings towards her? The closest he's come that I can think of is him defending her against herself when she's being self-deprecating.

Since the topic came up some pages ago, below are some thoughts on the comparison between Anisa and Yoko Ono. Tread with caution, as I have no idea what I'm talking about, and really it's not all that interesting to begin with.
Contrary to the popular narrative, I don't think Yoko Ono is someone of evil spirit. I might even say she is probably a good person in general (with notable exceptions, such as how she treated John Lennon's prior child). To demonstrate how different Yoko Ono is from Anisa, consider the following. Anisa will take almost any opportunity to shit on Ian in some way. If there is a way to sneak in an insult or backhanded compliment, she will do it. In contrast, I don't think Yoko Ono has ever really said anything negative about Lennon. She's always been very defensive of him in the content I've seen.

Another example. Anisa does not really love Ian, she mostly idolizes the picture of being in a relationship, and the performative non-sexual actions that come with it. Yoko Ono, on the other hand, I think probably did love Lennon quite a lot. On one hand, she stayed with him despite his cheating on her, and him purportedly killing her dog. Beyond that, if you ever watch interviews with them, or better, watch the Get Back documentary, it seems pretty reasonable that she really did like him. She looks at him with affection.

The breaking up of the Beatles is often pinned on Yoko Ono. I don't know if that's entirely fair. As has been noted before me, there were already tensions within the band about who should be allowed to make decisions. One of the really big troublemakers was actually George Harrison, who was pissed off about not getting as many tracks as Lennon & McCartney, and generally feeling like his artistic skills weren't being properly respected. John, towards the end of the band, was mostly checked out and high as fuck on heroin and other drugs, which also made him kind of a pushover. In the Get Back documentary, my memory is that you can see that he is really very docile.

While Anisa acts on impulse in service of herself, and through her incompetence has this lead to destruction, Yoko Ono strikes me as a bit different. If one accepts that she really cared for Lennon, then one can start to see a picture wherein she really feels hurt about the state of John's life, in general and with the band. His heroin usage made him much less engaged, and I could easily imagine her feeling like he was being pushed around, and that he was being sapped (e.g. by Paul McCartney) of his creative potential by not asserting himself. So, naturally then, she would have pushed him to fight for independence, which also happened to further split the Beatles apart. However, this destruction came not as a result of some kind of impulsive, BPD-manic response for Ono to serve herself, I think it probably really came from her wanting to help John escape from what she saw as a troubled situation.

All in all, I think Yoko Ono is probably fundamentally good natured and loyal, in stark contrast to Anisa, who can't seem to stop thirsting after Turkish meat while whining incessantly about nothing.

Of course, everything I've said above is very generous towards Yoko Ono, which I'm sure can be argued against by using one of the trillion books out there about how the Beatles broke up (and I'm ignoring how Yoko ended up with John Lennon too). However, I am also quite aware that most books on the topic of the Beatles are completely fucked and just make shit up, or take rumors at face value. I propose that the best resource for getting a picture of these people as actual people is the Get Back documentary, because it has relatively few editorial decisions on the part of the creator, and you get to see them all interact in long form. This is why I keep using it as an example.

Weidly enough, I wanna say that the conclusion of the spoilered armchair psychoanalysis might be that it is actually Ian who is closer to being Yoko Ono than Anisa, if one strips away the surface-level similarities.
Nah, that's stretching it too far. Fun to think about, though.
 
Silence of the Troons powiedział(a):
Going through the Stoic Ian part of the stream from yesterday, I found this segment (2:15:52-2:19:52 in the OG stream/49:32-53:32 in the archive.org stream) where Ian talks about U.S. involvement in South America and draws parallels between Venezuela and U.S. coups in the 70s and 80s. Isaac with the child molester 'stache talks about how the people who criticize Simple Ian are historically illiterate and probably couldn't even name three regime changes. Can Ian?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Asking someone to "name three regime changes" shows exactly the kind of "intellectual" that this Isaac fellow is. It's such a vaguely formed question and if someone actually understands what he was technically asking then anyone with any understanding of history wouldn't struggle at all. A regime change could technically keep all the exact same people in power, at the same time every single person could get replaced without affecting the regime. The regime is just the system of government and it can be changed with the full consent of the government and the governed. For example, the Constitutional Congress was a regime change. For that matter, so was the Revolutionary War. The South seceding was a regime change, and then the Union taking them back was yet another regime change. The ratification of the 17th Amendment was a regime change. Judicial reform and statehood for Puerto Rico and DC would be regime changes.

And while he didn't specify this I assume he means regime changes carried out by the US. But does he count regime changes by US-backed forces? Would Syria in 2024 have counted? Does he count non-military regime changes that the US encouraged (non-militarily) like Poland's democratic reforms in the early 90s? It doesn't matter though, because even if you go with the strictest possible definition of a regime change, as long as you explained it clearly that you are looking for examples of the US militarily destroying a government and replacing it not even the most historically illiterate American would struggle to remember the three biggest ones: Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, and the Confederate States of America. For some reason I think he wouldn't like these examples because they don't feed into his "America bad" ideology.

"Regime change" is not an academic term because it can mean so many things, it's really only useful to describe the general idea of forcing a change in government vs lesser interventions in specific examples where everyone knows the context, talking about regime change in a vacuum is totally meaningless otherwise. But Isaac thinks that he's clever by wrapping a simple idea with intimidating phrases he heard from other Breadtubers.

The Feline Solution 2 powiedział(a):
i am convinced Isaac (Zionist-coded name btw) and people like him never even read so much as the Cliffs Notes of any Vonnegut novel, they only claim to have read his books to sound smart and intellectual.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Considering that he goes out of his way to say that Slaughterhouse 5 is not his favorite Vonnegut book but then doesn't name a single other one makes it pretty clear.
That's not even his best work in my opinion. I like umm... a lot of his other books better
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Also, it's been a long time since I've read Slaughterhouse 5, but calling it "historical fiction" is a pretty silly way to describe it. It's historical fiction in the same way that a novel about a character who survived 9/11 is historical fiction. The Dresden bombing is an event in Billy Pilgrim's life, but isn't the main focus of the book.

Chongqing powiedział(a):
It would be funny if there was something like Drunk History, but instead of drunk people it's simple Ian trying to explain things he's been forced to read.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Sounds like the Karl Pilkington segments on The Ricky Gervais Show
Except that as much of a curmudgeon as Karl is he was 100x more engaging and open to new things than Ian.

Chieftain Coke Peanut powiedział(a):
Ian "Cain" Jomha? Yet another case of nominative determinism?

Wyświetl załącznik 8522847

Is his mark of cain his shit pants?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
The Mark of Cain meant that whoever visited harm upon him would face retribution sevenfold. Ian has the Mark of Ian Kane Jomha, whoever visits harm upon him will be rewarded sevenfold (with the exception of Anisa). Also he shits his pants.
 
Surfin Terf powiedział(a):
if you go with the strictest possible definition of a regime change, as long as you explained it clearly that you are looking for examples of the US militarily destroying a government and replacing it not even the most historically illiterate American would struggle to remember the three biggest ones: Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, and the Confederate States of America. For some reason I think he wouldn't like these examples because they don't feed into his "America bad" ideology.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Isn't like half of their politics being all-out for regime change in Russia?

It's fun to poke holes in their ideology and show how racist they actually are.
 
Bifocal Lens powiedział(a):
Their Discord has now become a full on group cope session.
This is how you know that yesterday's colab was a complete shit show - that Discord hasn't moved in weeks and now it's just people crying and coping.

ZoWeeMama would like us to choke to death (very leftist and progressive) and would also like every man to know that they have a very small penis 🤏🤏🤏. She also sends a message to all the women from KF: improve yourselves (sounds like something that Anisa would say).

Once again, just more coping and seething, saying that the people that inhabit KF/snark subs should get a life, kill themselves, etc. Funny, coming from a echo chamber that spends 24/7 on the Ethan Klein snark subs, cannot spend more than 24 hours saying how shitty Lex Jewthor is and that fully support taking away someone's children, income and beating him senseless (in a boxing ring, according to Ian).
Once again, they also confirmed that they constantly check the r/imisstheoldidubbz and this thread (Hi!). Yesterday, Han was going on about someone "posting KF references" and I don't even know what the fuck that means, so she must spend all her time here reading up on the lore.

I hope Ian does more collabs. This has been the most interesting thing to me since the 90 Day Fiancé debacle.

(Attatchments are still fucked. It should work if you click on them, though)

Wyświetl załącznik 8521705

Wyświetl załącznik 8521692
Wyświetl załącznik 8521693
Wyświetl załącznik 8521694
Wyświetl załącznik 8521695
Wyświetl załącznik 8521696
Wyświetl załącznik 8521689
Wyświetl załącznik 8521713
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
The discord full of obese lgbtqiap+ collecting disability checks for their aspergers thinks we need to improve our self worth :story:
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole