You see, the problem with you asserting something like this to people here is that we've actually communicated with you in writing. That is the medium of web forums. We have direct experience with which to judge your reading and writing abilities, so it doesn't convince or impress us for you to assert something like this.
To name a few examples that immediately came to mind in half a second:
-I think my very first post in this thread was to respond to you woefully mischaracterizing a basic criminological theory, to which you didn't respond to me because I am sure that on some level you recognize when you don't entirely know what you're talking about, pull something out of your ass, and somebody calls you out for it.
-I also recall
@Cuntster making an obvious joke about the amount of time they spend in this thread, which you completely misinterpreted as being a sincere denial that they spend that much time here. Literally everyone who read it except you comprehended it.
"Doctorate's literacy comprehension?" Dude, you can barely comprehend casual written conversations with average people. And while I admittedly haven't been familiar with every academic theory and concept you've brought up (stuff related to gender identity just doesn't interest me), when I have been familiar with the subject matter I can say that you consistently don't just misunderstand nuances, but core elements of such things. You mistake verbosity with substance and argument but everyone else can see through it.
I'd feel sorry for you for being so confused and deluded if you weren't being a pretentious and arrogant ass while making a fool of yourself.
