🌟 Internet Famous Turkey Tom / TomDark / @NotATurkey / TomDarkLive / anonbirdd / Thomas Larry Hanson - KiwiTuber, "Her Prostate" enjoyer, chronic shitstirrer, Destiny worshipper, pronouns respecter, Mr.Beast bootlicker, serial cheater, cuck, Kiwi Farms induced erectile dysfunction

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Axiom.
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
I find it crazy despite all the receipts tom is still getting shit on, since his main mistake here was having a poorly tuned crazy bitch radar.

Like at first it was rape accusations, but that flipped into her BEGGING for "violent rape", and people still blame him. They got him onto recording it, but turns out she begged to be recorded, and they still blame him.

I find it really gross and disturbing that it feels like many just completely ignore the woman's actions, but hyper analyze his. It's also another example of the sheer hypocrisy surrounding the idea of a "rape kink", because men get lambasted for even mentioning it in a private setting, yet she begs for violent rape in texts and it's just ignored. Or it's blamed on men anyway because "a guy made her that way", but nobody considered a woman might make a guy that way.

I still think that kinda stuff if behind closed doors isn't that bad, for either party, but the hypocrisy is insane. It takes 2 to tango.

I do find it low-key kinda funny how this basically gave him a license to humble brag about his sex life.
Most people here are just out for blood no matter who it is. Also a lot of people on this site are way too invested into this stuff sometimes, just enjoy the show folks.
 
1770144630351.png

What does Rusty know?
 
She didn't accuse him of rape though. That was something retards hallucinated because they heard that nigga say "night rape" prior to his e-girl exs talking about how he'd smack them around in bed.
The way she cropped the texts about rape time and escalated her claims of him ignoring her discomfort certainly implied he was rapist adjacent, but I'll concede she never directly said that. However, she straight up called him a pedophile, and that's a life-ruiner, although I'll grant that unlike their texts which she selectively released she probably wouldn't have known that (supposedly) he didn't know her age and didn't text anything sexual regardless.
 
I find it crazy despite all the receipts tom is still getting shit on
He still hasn't given satisfactory responses to a lot of the weird ageplay stuff/having a closet full of his ex's clothing. At this point though I think it's more just laughing at Tom being a weirdo with terrible taste in women rather than believing he was a woman beater, unless new evidence somehow comes out on that.
>couldn't stop Tom fucking BPD girls
>couldn't stop Mumkey from cheating on his 10/10 future wife with a pedophile furry

Rustybros...
 
Just catching up on this thread after wagecucking it all day yesterday. I think my main takeaway is that a lot of people in this thread seem to have no idea how fucked the current dating environment is for zoomers, or, if they do acknowledge it, their main takeaway seems to just be "zoomers are retarded". Which, fair enough, but also not very descriptive. I think just blaming porn is a bit of a cop-out. It's certainly a contributing factor, and I would wager it definitely had an impact on Tom's taste in women, but I don't think him being a gooner is the only thing directly responsible for the shitstorm that ensued.

Disregarding the ageplay accusations, which I think are a whole other can of worms and the far more damning of the two accusations, I can't really say Tom's behavior is too surprising, all things considered. He reminds me of a bunch of guys I knew in college, and his mistakes very much mirror theirs. I see a lot of people here wanting to play armchair quarterback to try and determine what is and isn't morally acceptable behavior regarding his behavior in these, I guess, "situationships" is the term zoomers use now. The fact of the matter is, for Zoomers being brought up today in the modern political climate, there are no rules for sexual engagement beyond the bare minimum, "as long as both people consent". If you are the average Zoomer brought up in modern-day deracinated atheistic America, you were not given any rules of engagement for proper behavior in a sexual relationship beyond "make sure both people consent". Which, seems adequate on the surface but also is retarded when you think about it for more than 5 seconds. I've known tons of guys who did the exact same thing Tom did, well, without the violent sex part, they would naively enter into "friends with benefits" situationships with random women and think everything was going just swimmingly until someone eventually caught feelings and it blew up catastrophically in their face. I do blame these guys for being retards, but they were also following the rules that they were given. The people they were sleeping with enthusiastically consented and said they were totally okay with just being "friends with benefits". The guys were perfectly okay with essentially just being fuck-buddies and figured that the girls they were seeing were equally as okay with it, since again, we are all taught growing up that men and women are basically the exact same so why wouldn't women be just as okay with meaningless casual sex as guys are.

I think it's rather obvious that you are playing with fire getting into a sexual relationship like that, but if you want to say that his behavior is morally wrong, you kind of have to bite the bullet and say that despite the fact that the women he is talking to are adults, fully capable of moral agency and consent, that they are incapable of making the determination that they are okay with these friends with benifits situations. Even if they state on numerous occasions that they understand that he is not looking for a serious relationship and are totally okay with just being fuck-buddies, it is still wrong for Tom to engage in that behavior.


It is very obvious from the screenshots shown in the video that Rowan wanted more of a commitment from Tom, while he was happy simply being friends with benefits. He even used the "I'm not ready to be in a relationship" line, which is so cliché it almost made me laugh out loud. This isn't to excuse any of Tom's behavior, rather just an attempt to give a bit of perspective from someone the exact same age as Tom. Like I said, I've known a lot of guys that made the same exact mistake he did. I think it's something every guy has to figure out the hard way as they mature. Hopefully, he can learn from his mistakes and grow as a person, ideally finding someone to date exclusively and not continuing to fuck BPD e-whores he finds on Instagram. Though, judging from his pattern of behavior i'd say the chances of that are slim, but there's always hope.

TLDR: Christians figured this out 2,000 years ago, find one person to marry and fuck for the rest of your life. If you do this zoomer casual situationship shit you will fuck your shit over hardcore.
 
Gentlemen, if a woman you’re talking to likes really rough sex, has a rape fetish, and is BPD, just make a tactical retreat because all of those are big red flags.
You need to have a massive amount of trust with someone to have sex with them. That’s obviously doubly true if you’re going to do BDSM or anything kinky, but at the end of the day, you’re literally caught with your pants down if you bang the wrong person. It doesn’t matter how careful you are in bed. It doesn’t matter if you’re a man or a woman. Showing that side of yourself, giving your trust to someone who doesn’t have your best interest at heart WILL blow up in your face.
 
It would have been forgotten in a week anyways. No one gives a fuck about turkey Tom. He's hideous.

That video didn't make him look good just made him look absolutely pathetic. I don't care if it vindicates him in the eye of a few developmentally stunted virgins
I’m sorry nigger but nearly every response to this video has been, “oh these bpd gooner egirls were desperately after that amerimutt zoomer cock and are only mad after being spurned.” Like pyro, the only consequence will be that he’s known as a bit of sexual weirdo (in fact to a lesser degree), not that that matters given that no one has high moral standards for a drama ‘tuber. The sort of people who care, like you apparently, probably wouldn’t have liked this guy’s content anyways so I very much doubt the incident will stymie his career moving forward.
 
Feel bad for tom tbh, having all these women force him to be their boyfriend and make him roleplay as Ted Bundy over and over, and whats even worse is they made him record it and jack off to it in his personal time later. life is hard for sensitive young men nowadays
 
I’m sorry nigger but nearly every response to this video has been, “oh these bpd gooner egirls were desperately after that amerimutt zoomer cock and are only mad after being spurned.” Like pyro, the only consequence will be that he’s known as a bit of sexual weirdo (in fact to a lesser degree), not that that matters given that no one has high moral standards for a drama ‘tuber. The sort of people who care, like you apparently, probably wouldn’t have liked this guy’s content anyways so I very much doubt the incident will stymie his career moving forward.
You think the opinions of a handful of internet incels matters way too much than it actually does



Fucking idiot lmao
 
I find it crazy despite all the receipts tom is still getting shit on, since his main mistake here was having a poorly tuned crazy bitch radar.

Like at first it was rape accusations, but that flipped into her BEGGING for "violent rape", and people still blame him. They got him onto recording it, but turns out she begged to be recorded, and they still blame him.

I find it really gross and disturbing that it feels like many just completely ignore the woman's actions, but hyper analyze his. It's also another example of the sheer hypocrisy surrounding the idea of a "rape kink", because men get lambasted for even mentioning it in a private setting, yet she begs for violent rape in texts and it's just ignored. Or it's blamed on men anyway because "a guy made her that way", but nobody considered a woman might make a guy that way.

I still think that kinda stuff if behind closed doors isn't that bad, for either party, but the hypocrisy is insane. It takes 2 to tango.

I do find it low-key kinda funny how this basically gave him a license to humble brag about his sex life.
You can't be a gooner that jacks off directly after sex to the recording you took of sex and sell "stop gooning" shirts. Chantal might as well wear a shirt that says "stop eating, idiot"
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole