N A R U v2 wants to enforce the forum rules

[Bullet Kin]

This isn't the first time I've been misdiagnosed by a pedophile on this website.

pedophiles? I thought they weren't real.

 

[N A R U v2]

pedophiles? I thought they weren't real.

That's exactly what they want you to think and exactly why everyone should object to Epstein clients trying to signal their virtue by demanding lolicon in anime be banned.

Thank you for being a whistleblower. That doesn't absolve you of your crimes though.

 

[Bullet Kin]

That's exactly what they want you to think and exactly why everyone should object to Epstein clients trying to signal their virtue by demanding lolicon in anime be banned.

Thank you for being a whistleblower. That doesn't absolve you of your crimes though.

Who's they? you sound like someone that knows a lot.

 

[N A R U v2]

Who's they?

You are they.

you sound like someone that knows a lot.

Ofc I do. I had a grade 13 literacy level in grade 6 and ample amounts of free time to devote to researching.

 

[Bullet Kin]

I do. I had a grade 13 literacy level in grade 6 and ample amounts of free time to devote to researching.

so you must be intelligent, cunning even with your typing. Even beyond a grade level that's non-existent. You do make it sound like you were alone in 6th grade.

 

[Butwhythough2]

@N A R U v2 Go ahead and press those charges and I'll call you one to your face because last time I checked being a lolicon defender, is not a crime to be prosecuted under. So you've got no case (just like against Valve). Plus you haven't posted any evidence of the contrary.

You're trying your little gambit because you hope I am a pedo, and that's one less person to make fun of you here. Now I have restitutions to go after you about because you are accusing me of a real crime which would be defamation per se (but you're broke, and the government can't garnish SSID.)

You're just being a little faggot by deflecting and derailing the thread. You're a sad little schizo nigger

 

[N A R U v2]

so you must be intelligent, cunning even with your typing. Even beyond a grade level that's non-existent.

Grade 13 refers to an additional year of secondary education beyond the standard 12th grade, implemented in various forms across different countries.

• In Ontario, Canada, Grade 13 (also known as the Ontario Academic Credit or OAC) existed from 1921 to 2003 as a fifth year of high school. It was required for university admission, offering advanced courses and allowing students to mature academically before entering post-secondary education. The system was phased out in 2003, leading to a double cohort of graduates that year. In 2022, the Ontario Liberal Party proposed reintroducing an optional Grade 13 to help students recover from pandemic-related learning losses.
• In the United States, there is no standardized Grade 13, but some schools offer optional fifth-year programs, particularly in early college high schools (e.g., in North Carolina and Oregon). These programs allow students to earn an associate degree or substantial college credits while remaining in a high school environment, often at no cost. These are typically targeted at underserved or first-generation college students.

You do make it sound like you were alone in 6th grade.

Kiwi Farmers make it sound like the cool kids are all pedophiles.

I'll accept being called friendless by those sorts as a compliment every time.

@N A R U v2 Go ahead and press those charges and I'll call you one to your face because last time I checked being a lolicon defender, is not a crime to be prosecuted under. So you've got no case (just like against Valve). Plus you haven't posted any evidence of the contrary.

You're trying your little gambit because you hope I am a pedo, and that's one less person to make fun of you here. Now I have restitutions to go after you about because you are accusing me of a real crime which would be defamation per se (but you're broke, and the government can't garnish SSID.)

You're just being a little faggot by deflecting and derailing the thread. You're a sad little schizo nigger

You're still not condemning Joshua Connor Moon for threatening a minor with sexual terrorism or hosting a website that doxxed and archived photos of children as young as 5 years of age.

As LoverOfPi, your fellow pedophile famously told me; calling you a pedophile isn't libel, even if it's wrong, if I sincerely believe that you are.

 

[Bullet Kin]

You're still not condemning Joshua Connor Moon for threatening a minor with sexual terrorism or hosting a website that doxxed and archived photos of children as young as 5 years of age.

If you yourself are using this site then aren't you also supporting children being doxxed as young as 5? Also I have not realized this was happening.

 

[N A R U v2]

If they honestly believe you're a pedo, it's not Libel, even if it's wrong.

¯⁠\⁠_⁠༼⁠ ⁠•́⁠ ͜⁠ʖ⁠ ⁠•̀⁠ ⁠༽⁠_⁠/⁠¯

If you yourself are using this site then aren't you also supporting children being doxxed as young as 5?

No, because I was targeted by this site for doxxing myself. I'm a dissenter to this site's continued existence, as can be seen by the lovely lolcow icon beside my username.

 

[Reptilian Infiltrator]

Nope. I'm not defending lolicon in anime there. You just quoted me replying to you verbatim while omitting the full context.

Wyświetl załącznik 8511385

You can click on the quote, and it will lead you to the context. I'm not omitting anything, and the context is irrelevant. You said you defend lolicon, you are a lolicon defender, whatever the reasons may be. And your reasons are retarded, by the way. Not that there ever would be any good reasons, but yours are just retarded.

Once again you are deliberately omitting the context to spin a disingenuous angle, and probably hoping the jannies will be stupid enough to delete the context like that time they were stupid enough to replace a video I posted with a different one after removing my ability to edit my own posts.

I am once again not omitting anything.. You have not provided any evidence, just a schizo babble.

 

[N A R U v2]

You can click on the quote, and it will lead you to the context. I'm not omitting anything, and the context is irrelevant. You said you defend lolicon, you are a lolicon defender, whatever the reasons may be. And your reasons are retarded, by the way. Not that there ever would be any good reasons, but yours are just retarded.

Local Kiwi Farmer thinks we should ban lolicon (but not doxxing and archiving photos of other people's children) because Epstein clients want to pass laws banning lolicon to deflect from their crimes against actual children. More news you've seen before at 6!

That's exactly what they want you to think and exactly why everyone should object to Epstein clients trying to signal their virtue by demanding lolicon in anime be banned.

 

[Reptilian Infiltrator]

Local Kiwi Farmer thinks we should ban lolicon (but not doxxing and archiving photos of other people's children) because Epstein clients want to pass laws banning lolicon to deflect from their crimes against actual children. More news you've seen before at 6!

Oh, this retarded fucking argument again. How is that even relevant? If those same people said murder is bad, would you start advocating for legalization of it? You're so goddamn stupid.

What Epstein clients even want this? You haven't even elaborated on that part. Not that I expect you to. Is it your hero Trump?

 

[N A R U v2]

Oh, this retarded fucking argument again. How is that even relevant? If those same people said murder is bad, would you start advocating for legalization of it? You're so goddamn stupid.

If people who oppose Kiwi farms started advocating in favor of doxxing children I would still argue against doxxing children. You're so goddamn stupid.

What Epstein clients even want this? You haven't even elaborated on that part. Not that I expect you to. Is it your hero Trump?

Trump is hardly my hero. If he's proven to be a kiddie diddler, straight to jail. The consequences upon the economy be damned.

Politicians (e.g Epstein clients)



Want this.

 

[Reptilian Infiltrator]

If people who oppose Kiwi farms started advocating in favor of doxxing children I would still argue against doxxing children. You're so goddamn stupid.



Trump is hardly my hero. If he's proven to be a kiddie diddler, straight to jail. The consequences upon the economy be damned.

Politicians (e.g Epstein clients)

Wyświetl załącznik 8511601

Want this.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=QcvtQ9sJM9o

So, why is it relevant that some Epstein clients want to ban lolicon? Do you still not believe sexual depictions of children are bad? Oh, let me guess, "it's just drawings, bro".

 

[Begemot]

The best defense is a good offense. And I'm nothing if not on the offense 24/7.

Sucking Gabe's dick isn't an offence, sport.

 

[Reptilian Infiltrator]

I'll just quote this in case he actually tries to go with the "it's just drawings, bro" argument.

They'll say, well it's just lines on paper or it's fictional and there's no victim. The obvious counter is, it's not the lines that are getting them off , It's that those lines or fictional character is or looks like a child that is arousing to them.

 

[Butwhythough2]

You're still not condemning Joshua Connor Moon for threatening a minor with sexual terrorism or hosting a website that doxxed and archived photos of children as young as 5 years of age.

I don't have to, as I am not him. He can defend himself, I'm sure. I'll tell you what though, if he ends up guilty in a court of law, I'll condemn him, with a DM to you apologizing for being incorrect. Until then get fucked, well never mind I can definitely tell you've never been with a woman.

Also you never posted a DM to Null expressing all of this, if you're truly righteous wouldn't you want to at least personally tell him that he's evil and commiting stochastic terrorism? Wouldn't that be your civic duty?

As LoverOfPi, your fellow pedophile famously told me; calling you a pedophile isn't libel, even if it's wrong, if I sincerely believe that you are.

He's right you hold no reputation, you're a schizo retard. Well you can believe things all you want, that doesn't make them true, that's your schizophenia talking, now take your meds retard.

If you yourself are using this site then aren't you also supporting children being doxxed as young as 5? Also I have not realized this was happening.

There isn't really unless you count Ralph's demon spawn 1&2, which had threads before they were born. In which is only that way because it's Ralph. I don't know if their really doxed as in address but they are named.

 

[LoverofPi]

I'm just waiting for internet anonymity to be repealed so I can sue Kiwi Farmers for defamation.

As previously stated, there's nothing to defame, but also we were talking in general. You were the one who took that personally.

You probably should have thought about that before calling me a lolicon defender without reading my actual thoughts on the matter, pedo.

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

You have repeatedly defended Lolicon. Here and elsewhere.

But I've had my ability to edit my own ports removed while the jannies are free to edit my posts in any which way they so please.

That's irrelevant because you don't have to be able to edit old posts to create a new one containing a retraction.

As you do while running a website that is hell-bent on allowing its users to libel the subject of your abuses as being a pedophile, a sexpest, a lolicon defender and more.

You act like a sex pest in this thread, Naru. You defend Lolicon in this thread. You are not called a pedophile by the thread title or most of the users.
I call you a schizo because you act like a fucking schizo.
None of these criticisms from anonymous accounts to other anonymous accounts suffices for libel.

You're not denying it.

He's just been confronted by a crazed person. You still haven't actually denied it even after everyone has been trying to explain to you the bad optics.

Pedophile detected. Dox with extreme prejudice, internet.

Naru, for the last time, we don't want to Dox you.

Still not providing any evidence to dispute my totally substantiated claim.

I don't think he'll recover from this one, boys.

It's your claims, I was hoping you would be the one to provide evidence.

That's not how things work ahead here. But even so, I already have. RIP bozo.

To explain, because Naru is a moron, he thinks everyone has focused on his fixation with Lolicon out of nowhere just because we don't like him and not because of the pattern of Lolicon avatars, fixation and support Lolicon looking (and lolicon supporting) vtubers, and his stated "I defend Lolicon" position makes him look suspicious, especially because other people have said "I defend lolicon because I am anti-censorship" and turned out to be super into lolicon. We talked to him about his weird evasion of the subject and his refusal to deny it outright because he refused to give a straight answer when asked directly after these things.


By the way: Naru lives for this forum. He absolutely woke up and wrote six posts, in a row, before anyone else responded. The Farms are the first thing on Naru's mind when he wakes up, the last thing on his mind when he goes to bed.

So that's why he's randomly accusing you, and why he thinks your genuine confusion is a sign of guilt. Because that seems to be the only way he knows how to form a defense.

 

[N A R U v2]

So, why is it relevant that some Epstein clients want to ban lolicon? Do you still not believe sexual depictions of children are bad? Oh, let me guess, "it's just drawings, bro".

Where did I say sexual depictions of children in drawings are good?

Sucking Gabe's dick isn't an offence, sport.

RIP Gaben's corporate dong. Ain't nobody gonna be sucking that raisin if this lawsuit suceeds.

Rejoice, PC Gamers who enjoy owning their games! Anti-competition lawsuits are finally coming for Valve!

I'll just quote this in case he actually tries to go with the "it's just drawings, bro" argument.

Local Kiwi Farmer continues to deflect when faced with Kiwi Farms' own documented history of being deplatformed for hosting child pornography after the site's users repeatedly defend the owner's attempts at soliciting nudes from an underage girl.

Nobody shocked other than the users defending pedophilia while decrying lewd drawings.

You have repeatedly defended Lolicon. Here and elsewhere.

You have repeatedly defended actual grooming attempts by @Null

What a then 18 year old convinced a 15 year old did over a decade ago doesn't bother me, but you're welcome to go to the authorities about it, I am not here to cape for or to excoriate null.

Corporate needs you to find the differences between this collection of ideological hive mind of accusations from Kiwi Farmers and this ideological hive mind of accusations from the red guard

They're the same picture.

So, why is it relevant that some Epstein clients want to ban lolicon?

Because you don't want to see @Null arrested for soliciting nudes from a minor.

Also you never posted a DM to Null expressing all of this, if you're truly righteous wouldn't you want to at least personally tell him that he's evil and commiting stochastic terrorism? Wouldn't that be your civic duty?

Am I even able to with the restrictions he placed on my account?

Let's go find out together!

It would appear not! What a shame!





Since you appear to be in constant communication with him, why don't you invite him to come defend his unrequited love interest relationship with a 15 year old girl?

I don't have to, as I am not him. He can defend himself, I'm sure. I'll tell you what though, if he ends up guilty in a court of law, I'll condemn him, with a DM to you apologizing for being incorrect. Until then get fucked, well never mind I can definitely tell you've never been with a woman.

 

[Bullet Kin]

It would appear not! What a shame!

Wyświetl załącznik 8512375

Wyświetl załącznik 8512377

Why a google pixel?