Listen dude, you call others pedophiles like me and
@LoverofPi when we pressed you on loli shit. I never called you a pedophile, I just called it weird. I don't make that accusation unless I have the ebidance to prove so. So just move along from this.
I want to focus more on what the thread was about, your fight with Steam, and the DoJ needs to bring up war crime trials against the creators of the retard shot (presumably Faucci too). Unfortunately Faucci has been pardoned by Biden. I don't know if you think that pardon was legitimate (because we learned that late in his presidency, staffers were signing his name to bills and pardons).
Since Faucci is pardoned (maybe) who does the DoJ go after? Pfizer and the other company one I can't be bothered to look up? Or do they try to say that Faucci's pardon was illegitimate?
Also this, not everything is a projection bud. Sometimes people call a spade a spade.
Taking that as a "yes, I Naru the Schizo, had to give in to the compulsion to post a youtube video."
That's not a flat denial. A flat denial would be saying "I am not sexually attracted to minors, depictions of minors, or depictions of people who look underage" which you seem oddly loathe to do for some reason.
As an aside, throwing out accusations left and right against the people you're mad at feels much more witch hunt-y than pointing out that the vtubers you idolize and the causes you defend are at best bad optics and possibly indicative of worse.
That's been my whole argument to him, but he can't seem to get it through his head. I don't take kindly to being called a pedophile just because I'm against lolicon. That's the same cope lolicons use against anyone who calls them out. They'll cope in 3 ways.
- They'll say, well it's just lines on paper or it's fictional and there's no victim. The obvious counter is, it's not the lines that are getting them off , It's that those lines or fictional character is or looks like a child that is arousing to them.
- They deflect and call you a pedo for hating lolicon to take the heat off of them. I don't follow the line of reasoning besides deflection.
- They'll say it helps to keep real pedophiles from offending, even if they don't straight up offend they still have the urge and is still attracted to children.
You are correct, but I want to point out that point 1 and point 3 contradict each other. That's not your error, mind, the loli defenders peddle both arguments and either are not clever enough to realize the cognitive dissonance involved or they hope you aren't.
2 and 3 also contradict each other, but point 2 is kind of a contradiction all on its own. "You don't like sexual depictions of fictional children, you must like the real thing!"
I know it's contradictory but it's an excuse they use anyways.
I once read a paper on pedophillia and child abuse. There was a part in it where it claimed that they'll pick favorites or put someone on a pedestal claiming they wouldn't hurt that particular person. The paper gave some insight on how these sub-humans think.
Oh, I didn't mean to imply the self contradiction was your fault. It's in their thinking.
Yeah, I don't doubt the justifications are all as fucked up as that.
I'm just waiting for internet anonymity to be repealed so I can sue Kiwi Farmers for defamation.
It won't be long now.
Listen dude, you call others pedophiles like me and @LoverofPi when we pressed you on loli shit. I never called you a pedophile, I just called it weird. I don't make that accusation unless I have the ebidance to prove so. So just move along from this.
Let's see this evidence then.
Also this, not everything is a projection bud. Sometimes people call a spade a spade.
Surely, sure you are not just projecting your guilt on others.
I don't take kindly to being called a pedophile just because I'm against lolicon.
You probably should have thought about that before calling me a lolicon defender without reading my actual thoughts on the matter, pedo.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Present the evidence or prepare to lawyer up,
@Butwhythough2
" ... Stocking was 17 when
@Null was threatening her with sexual violence btw.
I'm really not sure how anyone could rationalize that sort of behaviour,
but I'm all too aware there are many people in the world who have seen the Rotherham scandal coverup, the Epstein files coverup, the left's disingenuous response to Charlie Kirk's assassination, and have still somehow come to the conclusion that obliging the actual predators in positions of cultural and legal power's desire to censor fictional depictions of their own crimes against children (in the form of anime) would actually somehow benefit children more than demanding those responsible for abusing children not be allowed to push incremental censorship to cover their own crimes under the guise of protecting the children would, but now that anti-ice protestors have blown up Ice Cube's tour bus after mistaking it for an ICE prisoner transport...
I think it's safe to assume logic and reason don't apply to clown world discussions on websites created by a self-professed sexual deviant (with a documented history of threatening sexual violence against underaged girls) dedicated to doxxing children either.
Now if anyone wants to have a serious discussion about banning lolicon in anime AFTER the actual pedophiles running the world have been held accountable and there is enough evidence to reasonably state beyond reasonable doubt that lolicon/shotacon in anime is a direct pipeline to pedophilia in adults who partake in it, I'll be more than willing to agree to censoring it out of existence.
@Null might find banning Neko shotacon disagreeable, but that is a
@Null problem for Kiwi Farmers to contend with. ..."
I got sick of Naru referencing that faggy Matthew Hopkins site all the time so I looked into the owner and, uh, turns out it's a goldmine. Naru's been using this guy as a source since forever and he's saying gems like this:
Wyświetl załącznik 7970442
He's even got a whole ass
thread here, hilarious. Seems like there's a lot of lore here, just a tangential search of his name brought up a
whole site detailing events up to 2021 about him, and an X comment from our own dear feeder:
Wyświetl załącznik 7970388L (
a)
So, moral of the story is when someone hands you a gun, you should think...
Show me where I celebrate doxing. I said it happens, there are members of the site that dox, a majority don't as they're just interested in the gossip and drama. I don't dox. I take a neutral stance.
I think it's safe to assume logic and reason don't apply to clown world discussions on websites created by a self-professed sexual deviant (with a documented history of threatening sexual violence against underaged girls) dedicated to doxxing children either.
*Clears throat* ladies and gentlemen of the court of public opinion, I present to you evidence that
@Butwhythough2 is a raging pedophile.
I'm all too aware there are many people in the world who have seen the Rotherham scandal coverup, the Epstein files coverup, the left's disingenuous response to Charlie Kirk's assassination, and have still somehow come to the conclusion that obliging the actual predators in positions of cultural and legal power's desire to censor fictional depictions of their own crimes against children (in the form of anime) would actually somehow benefit children more than demanding those responsible for abusing children not be allowed to push incremental censorship to cover their own crimes under the guise of protecting the children would,
Listen dude, you call others pedophiles like me and @LoverofPi when we pressed you on loli shit. I never called you a pedophile, I just called it weird. I don't make that accusation unless I have the ebidance to prove so. So just move along from this.
" ...
Deliberately Targeting Underage Children
Recently, Dynastia held a poll on Kiwi Farms as to whether it was okay to dox underage children (archive
here). The vote passed 14 to 10. In case anyone was wondering if it was a joke the site has subsequently literally carried out the policy and doxxed children as young as 5, for example the child of Block Bot administrator Marian Aanerud (
@MAMelby). Again, because of this the, ‘Nyberg Defence’ will not fly.
In ultra-creepy fashion, the Kiwi Farmers archived a (clothed) photo gallery of Aanerud’s young son. Nothing says, ‘no paedophiles here’ like creating a photo archive of someone else’s 5 year old. In this light Dynastia’s pious claims he is against harm to children are laughable. Whilst claiming to SWAT paedophiles he is helping stalk children.
Your author loathes Marian Aanerud, who
was ‘laid off’ a few weeks after falsely accusing me of stalking. Even so, I am not going to link her Kiwi Farms thread here or the pictures of her children. Whilst there are legitimate criticisms of Aanerud and the Block Bot to be made neither I, nor any member of GamerGate has ever stooped to doxxing her child or running photos of him.
As noted above, such conduct is a specific offence in Florida. This must be especially upsetting to Aanerud given Moon’s previous statements about masturbating to Hentai containing underage boys. I will not provide links here but have provided them directly to law enforcement. Aanerud could do far worse than contact Sheriff Morgan (
dmorgan@escambiaso.com). ..."
Stop being faggots and just let me do it you worthless faggot cucks this isn't fucking Sweden.
So
@Butwhythough2 will you be retracting your false accusations against me being a lolicon defender in writing here on Kiwi farms or via publicly accessible court transcripts?
So
@Butwhythough2 will you be retracting your false accusations against me being a lolicon defender in writing here on Kiwi farms or via publicly accessible court transcripts?
This is supposed to say
So
@Butwhythough2 will you be retracting your false accusations against me
of being a lolicon defender in writing here on Kiwi farms or via publicly accessible court transcripts?
But I've had my ability to edit my own ports removed while the jannies are free to edit my posts in any which way they so please.
As you do while running a website that is hell-bent on allowing its users to libel the subject of your abuses as being a pedophile, a sexpest, a lolicon defender and more.
Totally above board behaviour. Why do you doubt our institutions like the DOJ who are supposedly trying and failing to hold this website that doxxes children as young as 5 years old accountable in court of law as told by the users defending this website's totally not criminal behaviours?
I want to focus more on what the thread was about, your fight with Steam, and the DoJ needs to bring up war crime trials against the creators of the retard shot (presumably Faucci too). Unfortunately Faucci has been pardoned by Biden. I don't know if you think that pardon was legitimate (because we learned that late in his presidency, staffers were signing his name to bills and pardons).
Since Faucci is pardoned (maybe) who does the DoJ go after? Pfizer and the other company one I can't be bothered to look up? Or do they try to say that Faucci's pardon was illegitimate?
