- Dołączono
- 16 Lut 2016
It was sufficiently alleged in whatever evidence and testimony was on the timeline site the evening Nick went over the allegations pre-interview. I could be wrong but I believe it came up tangential to rough-sex allegations.I know about that one, it sounds like it was verified by some other material. That's why i'm asking.
e: searched the transcript for "hog" and "pay" to find where Nick was lead to believe that a large penis was in play:
The first one is a bit circumstantial but strongly implies a large hog, however the second one "how's the peen" - "too much honestly" doesn't leave too much to the imagination. Nick does question if it's actually that big but there's plenty in the initial evidence to come to that conclusion.
Ostatnio edytowane: