US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

Wyróżnienie
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Zenos Yae Viator powiedział(a):
the machine will not miss, the machine will not need time to ascess you as a target, raise or get a gun and shoot you, it will do all that in a pico second.
the machine can do it from further away, with better target acquisition, heat or movement or noise detection many grades higher than anything you can do.

The problem has always been how to power the machine, and how to make the machine move, those questions have slowly begun to be answered, and thus meat soldiers will face a huge reckoning on the battlefield.

any anti-machine weapon you can bring or think of, can be outfitted better on another machine, people have to shit, piss and sleep, they miss, they leave the anti-w/e laying around, feet away... the machine will not, it cannot be overcome in any numbers that you'd find acceptable by people, only by overwhelming ordinance from other machines (simple or robotic).
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
The world isn't Skynet and robots are fragile pieces of shit. Lol lmao. Now pass the machine gun
 
Sensitive Young Man powiedział(a):
Pete Hegseth announces the end of the 8(a) program. This program’s purpose was to give 200,000 bucks to pajeets so they could set up gas stations. It ending will go a long way towards stemming the Indian tide.
BdR7ip7wV-7P0Ezd.mp4
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Cause the jeets will make perfect test subjects for chemical warfare experiments. If they can stomach the diarhea slop they eat then something that can kill them will be potent against any defensive measures.
 
It seems to me that the tension between the US and Europe right now is predicated on the assumption that Russia's invasion of Europe is imminent. Has there been any evidence or statement from Putin that backs this premise up, or is it rooted in Western media making shit up?
 
WelperHelper99 powiedział(a):
The world isn't Skynet and robots are fragile pieces of shit. Lol lmao. Now pass the machine gun
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
it isn't yet, but things are quickly evolving in terms of unmanned weaponry.
a few years from now they will have wild shit, drones that will needle you in the heart or brain from 1000+ meters, so high up you could never have spotted it in a million years while your in the shit.

it doesn't matter if the machine is fragile, you can pump out a billion of these drones once the design is finalized, a human takes at least 18 years to get him to the point you can then blow a ton of money training and arming him.

a legion of 6 thousand dollar drones (once perfected) is simply put, far more cost effective than a ground force, leagues more, its not going to be spooky shiny skeletons like in Terminator, its going to be sleek, small flying drones that cordinate with each other to take you out without you ever seeing it coming.
 
For the record, I do not consider illegal immigrants to be "my neighbors." So every permutation of "Why don't you care that ICE is rounding up your neighbors" does not work on me.
 
Anyone notice how retarded and woke the new quarters are? It's all just random women you've never heard of with WORDS WORDS WORDS to coinsplain to you who they are and why you should care.

On the plus side, I just got a bicentennial quarter after swapping out my cart a Aldi. I hope 2026 has some cool semisesquicentennial coins. If they are, then I'll have to pick up silver versions too.

On the down side, Aldi was full of jeets! (:_(
 
Zenos Yae Viator powiedział(a):
it isn't yet, but things are quickly evolving in terms of unmanned weaponry.
a few years from now they will have wild shit, drones that will needle you in the heart or brain from 1000+ meters, so high up you could never have spotted it in a million years while your in the shit.

it doesn't matter if the machine is fragile, you can pump out a billion of these drones once the design is finalized, a human takes at least 18 years to get him to the point you can then blow a ton of money training and arming him.

a legion of 6 thousand dollar drones (once perfected) is simply put, far more cost effective than a ground force, leagues more, its not going to be spooky shiny skeletons like in Terminator, its going to be sleek, small flying drones that cordinate with each other to take you out without you ever seeing it coming.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
They said the same thing about the pointed bullet. That battles would be fought at thousands of yards. Turns out most combat still happens within 300 yards. War never changes bud.
 
"The Chef's Kiss" :story:

KWK052.png


I don't know how to really enshrine it into law, but deep blue cities need to have all their cases moved out of state or at least out of the county the blue city is in. This is not acceptable for justice:

KWK051.png

If these people cannot stick the the minimum required for a functional society, they lose the right to be represented.
 
Meat Target powiedział(a):
Okay, but why is the Warmaster announcing it?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Yeah you go ahead and tell the Warmaster he can't do it when he shows up rip-roaring ready to go.

ETA:
mandatorylurk powiedział(a):
I don't know how to really enshrine it into law, but deep blue cities need to have all their cases moved out of state or at least out of the county the blue city is in. This is not acceptable for justice:
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
You remind them that jury nullification isn't a "free action" and has genuine risks associated with it: ICE agents will -- now knowing for certain that locals will not support them under any circumstances -- simply shoot to kill immediately when someone does shit like this from now on instead of simply arresting them and hoping local law enforcement will do its job.

As much as I appreciate James Duane for his legitimately good efforts teaching citizens how to avoid wrongful convictions (he's the "Don't Talk to the Police" video guy) and potential jurists what their actual rights are (since courts go out of their way to lie about it), I do wish he'd tell the whole story when it comes to nullification.

Juries absolutely do have the right to nullify like they've done here when the think a prosecution, despite technically being lawful and sufficiently proven by the evidence, is defective or immoral in some fashion. It's supposed to be reserved for actually absurd prosecutions (like when an obviously almost-all white county genuinely pursues a racism-driven charge and railroads a black guy through the wringer over something actually retarded, which has been known to happen, and the jurors are smart enough to recognize bullshit when they smell it).

Nullification is not supposed to be used like this, to simply overrule a legitimate prosecution with overwhelming evidence. Nullification is meant for "we recognize this law is in force, we acknowledge the prosecution has satisfactorily proven his case, we accept and agree the defendant has done what the prosecution says he's done, and we believe this specific law under which he is being prosecuted in this specific case is faulty and should not be enforced." It's not meant for "we think murder is fine if it's a cop who died lol."

Good example of nullification: 17-year-old boy meets 17-year-old girl. They fall in love and fuck like rabbits (because they're teenagers). Girl's parents hate boy. Community in general thinks they're a cute couple and tell girl's parents to fuck off and let them be happy. Boy turns 18 years old a couple months before she does. Parents report their sexual activity to police (who also hate boy for some reason). Parents arrest him, and being idiot teenagers both of them scream and shout that she consented, etc., "proving" by confession that an 18-year-old is boffing a 17-year-old, which is still technically illegal in some states. Prosecutors charge him with statutory rape. Goes to trial, no plea bargain, because "fuck you." Jurors acquit, because the apparatus is being fucking stupid.

Bad example of nullification: this shit.

The former is an obvious misapplication of law (and is why Romeo and Juliet laws have become common) by asshole parents and dickhead cops where no actual harm is being done to anyone (neither the proposed "victim," the community at large, or the state) by an alleged (and provable) "crime." The latter is a deliberate act of violence, obviously in violation of a reasonable law (damaging property with your car is a crime), with the acquittal only happening because the jurors agreed with the offender that the victim deserved the violence.

Now, every act of jury nullification carries with it a major risk (that every asshole promoting nullification conveniently fails to bring up): the government will hold a grudge. Next time someone tries this with ICE agents present, they'll shoot to kill to keep the matter of "actually punishing the original crime" out of the hands of juries. If they don't shoot to kill but apprehend the prick anyway, he'll be hauled out of state for federal prosecution with the same goal. Legislation will be revised to change how juries are charged with their duty (some states now ask juries to determine facts, not guilt, which is a subtle but legally important distinction and gives judges more leeway to ignore a jury's findings). Laws get updated or passed making convictions easier to achieve and harder to nullify.

Meanwhile, cities or regions that make a habit of nullifying valid, reasonable laws will find themselves losing no end of federal funding for unrelated reasons. Retaliatory options are nearly endless and you'll never be able to prove it's because of some random smarmy nullification "protest" from five years back.

lol they'll just shoot first and ask questions later now. Good job, jurists.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
WelperHelper99 powiedział(a):
They said the same thing about the pointed bullet. That battles would be fought at thousands of yards. Turns out most combat still happens within 300 yards. War never changes bud.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
war has changed thousands of times over, the future of war will be drones and A.I. controlled and cordinated machines, with humans simply to put boots on the areas claimed.

nothing can possibly out economically compete with such a force, there will always be the need for a human element, but you have no idea what's coming in terms of drones and computers
 
deleuzeon powiedział(a):
<late night at Democrat HQ> We care, but not that much. Send our least powerful Jew.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Maybe the activists and NGOS who lurk here saw their thread go live, and now see an opportunity to turn two liabilities into martyrs.

(IIRC @Null said that Jared Holt, some Atlantic Council "extremism expert" with the most punchable face on the planet, plagiarizes his research on Fuentes and Ralph from their KF threads).
 
Zenos Yae Viator powiedział(a):
war has changed thousands of times over, the future of war will be drones and A.I. controlled and cordinated machines, with humans simply to put boots on the areas claimed.

nothing can possibly out economically compete with such a force, there will always be the need for a human element, but you have no idea what's coming in terms of drones and computers
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Electronic warfare jammers beg to differ.
 
ForTheHoard powiedział(a):
It seems to me that the tension between the US and Europe right now is predicated on the assumption that Russia's invasion of Europe is imminent. Has there been any evidence or statement from Putin that backs this premise up, or is it rooted in Western media making shit up?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I don't know about imminent, but Russia's eventual dominance over the continent is a running theme of revanchist/Duginist rhetoric that seems to influence recent directions of Russian policy, so it's fair to say it's a goal of the Russian state.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole