Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Screenshot_20260113_124151_Adobe Acrobat (1).jpg
Ol' Greer shooting off at the mouth again.
 
I certainly understand that judges are busy, and this case is not a high priority for them. Refereeing a tard slap fight isn't life or death. That said, it still looks bad to let things become this bloated with crap - it's like some nasty abscess ready to burst from robot spam.
At this case it's bullshit too. It's low priority but it's low effort too. Every one of Russhole's bullshit motions is so patently ridiculous that it could be dismissed in a couple sentences. Just cut and paste a citation from a previous opinion you wrote stating the standards for granting such a motion, say lmao no, sign.

Each one of these things could have been done in less than an hour.
Imagine what a curse it would be to be able to read Russle's mind. It must be such a stinking mess of rage and horniness in there.
I'd rather read the Necronomicon out loud than Russhole's mind, or what passes for a mind.
 
Really good citation by Mr. Hardin. This seems almost word for word with what happened in our case:
Its breakdown of the bad citations also demonstrates that Greer's retarded theory of "even if it's a bad cite, I still argued the general outline correctly" doesn't work either.
  • "The cited case does not contain the second quotation."
  • "There is a Michigan Supreme Court case on the statute at issue called [X], but it does not stand for the proposition [that he argued for]"
  • "Kaufman discusses objective notice, but it does not stand for the stated proposition." <- LIKE EVERY SINGLE GREER CITE EVER
  • "As noted above, the R&R ignored Stefanski because it does not exist."
  • "Wurtz does not contain the quoted language or any similar statement"
And so on. You could apply one of these to every time Greer believes he cited something relevant, just because his Google search matched a keyword.

Greer will never wrap his head around the idea that citing to alt-alt-O'Bannon, which did contain the single word "futile", does not retroactively make his original claims about the first case any more true.
 
ChatGreePT shit out a filing!


tard.png

and a reminder that he did indeed agree to meet....


agreement by tard.png

in Greer's latest filing, he specifically is excluding that response, instead creating a new chain where three days later he responded in the negative. He's trying to muddy the waters here.


Jan 6 Response.png
 

Załączniki

Ostatnio edytowane:
Is English your first language, Shitlips?

Mr Hardin is referring to you very clearly proposing a date and time for meet and conferral regarding a transfer.

He is straight retarded. :lossmanjack:
This is so obviously misrepresenting what Hardin said to such a retarded degree that it should be immediately sanctionable. Obviously it won't, but in a sane world it would be.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 8415326
I doubt this is genuine, I believe it's a fabrication
For the record here is footnote 1:

1 Just yesterday, Mr. Greer decided he wanted to engage in a formal meet and conferral


regarding potential retransfer of this case to Florida or transfer to Ohio. Exhibit C. But as


undersigned counsel was drafting this Opposition, Mr. Greer canceled that meet and


confer. Exhibit A. This follows almost a month of correspondence with Mr. Greer, in


which he has repeatedly claimed he does not understand or needs repeated what


questions undersigned counsel has posed. Exhibit B.
431 was filed on the fifth, Greer's non-consent email is from the sixth. Time travel is back on the menu.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole