You mean rogue. Sorry to be pedantic, but rouge is a color and a common typo.
It will be called the Trail of Queers.
Step 1:
Oh no, I had hot chick heaven in the brain
Honey, what you should start worrying about is the fact that we're finally starting to look at you and seeing you for what you are.
Why are there Tongans in this country? Did the Founders even know what is a Tonga?
Ah. Well, I will privately doom until further notice because I do not trust fags in black dresses farther than I can throw them. And in the case of that diabetic fatass Sotomayor that is definitely not far.
I was just talking to some Oregonians in chat recently and they actually thought the governorship might be up for grabs for Republicans. This surprised me so I looked into it and the last election was way closer than I expected, Kotek the Democrat won but was only ahead of Drazan by 4 points with both getting in the mid 40s; to contrast, the 2022 CA governor's race saw Newsom get 59% of the vote (a little gem from wikipedia: "This was a smaller margin of victory than in 2018, and the first time since 2010 that the Democratic gubernatorial nominee did not win at least 60% of the vote.").
Honestly, I've always gotten the sense California wouldn't be that hard to turn lightly Red in 20 or so years if the Republicans actually cared enough to build up the party in the state.
In the non-literary type of philosophy (I'd say non-intellectual, because I'm a cunt), the Anglo branch that's basically just nerds making up trick questions, there are a lot of theoretical "zombies," people who are just like us but [one difference], invented to evoke specific questions.
You're saying the problem is within OR GOP? Sounds like they need to spend more honestly. I'm just a bit skeptical because in 2024, Harris put up closer to Newsom numbers with 55% of the vote. I don't know any of this off the top of my head, I'm just googling shit to sanity check and I'm sure you have a better handle on it, but it seems like at least one OR GOP politician was much more palatable to the locals than Trump and not totally unelectable.
And there's your biggest problem. 'controlled opposition' is too generous of a term for the CA GOP who are happy to sit and collect sinecures in the ever-shrinking remains of Red California.
I guess I'm just wondering whether you can help me understand the gubernatorial election results. Like yes, Republicans don't ever win, but it's consistently way closer than CA. Drazan was the closest since 2010 (which was within 2 points!) with that 4 point spread, and that's complicated by an independent getting 8% of the vote, but how do you square that with what you're saying? Was Kotek so bad as a Democrat she herself should have been unelectable? Was Drazan actually not that bad a candidate?
I thought that was confirmed when ~30% of the population reported having no internal monologue. This isn't a hypothetical, these unensouled things are real and you pass by them every day.