Nick wouldn’t want to give his kids any ideas.
I'd be more concerned about
him getting ideas.
Much like Lyle and Erik, Nick is
heavily dependent on his parents for financial support. I'd be concerned what he might do if they ever tried to cut him off.
And lest what I just wrote seem too aloggy, I would remind you all that the dude has abused and killed several small animals already. Including a harmless domesticated dog. He's already got all the major traits of a full on
psychopath. I don't think such a thing is completely out of the realm of possibility.
I think what's keeping that from happening is that Bob and Celeste still seem extremely permissive, whereas (IIRC) the motive for the Melendez killings was that Jose was just about to write his two shithead sons out of his will.
I disagree
I think there's enough dumb boomers out there who either don't know about his crimes or think that he's changed to get him a loyal audience
Nowhere near the size of his old audience, but probably the biggest size he could get
The biggest sticking point in that is you are no longer spoiled for choices when it comes to YouTube channels covering trials.
Ask yourself this: Why the fuck would you watch Nick when you could watch Andrea Burkhart, Emily Baker, and/or a bunch of others Lawtubers together in a panel format (something Nick will never get back)?
Nick claims Lawtube can't make it without him. He is full of shit. He can't make it without
them. They were and are the talent. He is just a channel owner. His mediocre performance during the Karen Read trial proved this.


Nicholas Robert Rekieta has
officially won THIRD in the
Lolcow Emeritus Awards, placing him as a podium "winner" for 2025.


Congratulations Nick, on your increasing irrelevance from twice LOTY winner, to a second loser. May this be your last hurrah before an ignoble end.
Agreed. I really do hope this is the last year.