Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[AnOminous]

But for the court itself, it is difficult to imagine this registering as anything more than a low-priority nuisance, another entry flagged by case-management software as “overdue,” rather than a matter of importance.

Except a case between megacorporations has every single party citing an appeal from it in their briefs before the Supreme Court, including amici that include us.

Meanwhile these two stooges are doing jack shit.

 

[BelUwUga]

Except a case between megacorporations has every single party citing an appeal from it in their briefs before the Supreme Court, including amici that include us.

Meanwhile these two stooges are doing jack shit.

Wasn't it suggested/loosely agreed that there was no hurry in this case because of the Supreme case? I know it wasn't a direct stay/motion but I vaguely remember it coming up as a reason in favor of staying discovery.

 

[obsdj]

Wasn't it suggested/loosely agreed that there was no hurry in this case because of the Supreme case? I know it wasn't a direct stay/motion but I vaguely remember it coming up as a reason in favor of staying discovery.

It was suggested by Hardin that the judges hold off on ruling on the motion to dismiss until Cox v. Sony is decided. However he did not also suggest sitting on their asses refusing to rule on all the other idiotic open motions, of which there are manyyyyyyyyyyyy.

 

[Pee Cola]

Perhaps we should figure out how it is possible to report these clowns. We need to get our ducks in a row first. I haven't figured it out yet, but there is probably a way even a random Kiwi could report shit like this.

I'm in two minds on this.

Part of me believes Magistrate Judge Bowtie and Judge Barlow each need a rocket up them, but another part of me is concerned that tattling on the judges to a higher authority would be handling the feces.

 

[AnOminous]

It was suggested by Hardin that the judges hold off on ruling on the motion to dismiss until Cox v. Sony is decided. However he did not also suggest sitting on their asses refusing to rule on all the other idiotic open motions, of which there are manyyyyyyyyyyyy.

They're allowing Greee to spam the docket with obvious AI bullshit. If they did the bare minimum that their job requires, they'd at least issue an order to make this rat-faced faggot quit spamming.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

how rule in favor of Greer.

Hardin basically asked them to wait until SCOTUS rules. I think they are doing exactly that. I believe they will use the SCOTUS ruling to a) dismiss the case and b) use the new precedent to make both parties bear their own legal costs. "No harm, no foul" dismissal. It's clean and takes away Greers appeals of fees, awards, fines, etc.

 

[obsdj]

Hardin basically asked them to wait until SCOTUS rules. I think they are doing exactly that. I believe they will use the SCOTUS ruling to a) dismiss the case and b) use the new precedent to make both parties bear their own legal costs. "No harm, no foul" dismissal. It's clean and takes away Greers appeals of fees, awards, fines, etc.

"Clean" would be issuing a ruling several months ago (since this is a time travel case) ordering the parties to shut the fuck up and not send in any more filings without court approval while we all wait for Cox v. Sony to be disposed. Isn't that what the judge in the Acerthorn case did?

 

[Harvey Danger]

They're allowing Greee to spam the docket with obvious AI bullshit. If they did the bare minimum that their job requires, they'd at least issue an order to make this rat-faced faggot quit spamming.

An order staying discovery didn't stop him from scamming two subpoenas. Does anybody think an order to STFU is going to stop him from sperging?

 

[BoomerPrime]

An order staying discovery didn't stop him from scamming two subpoenas. Does anybody think an order to STFU is going to stop him from sperging?

Personally, not at all, but that would just go in Hardin's favor and show to the Court that Shitlips is a vexatious faggot.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

but another part of me is concerned that tattling on the judges to a higher authority would be handling the feces.

Im not going to shit up the thread any more today, since I'm not an attorney. But I will add how much of this joke of a trial already constitutes feces handling?

 

[Pee Cola]

Im not going to shit up the thread any more today, since I'm not an attorney. But I will add how much of this joke of a trial already constitutes feces handling?

I was thinking along the lines of directly touching the doody, though I get how my wording could be construed as a reference to how this lolsuit is a shitshow rivaling the biggest dung-throwing festivals of India.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Unrelated judge in unrelated case (Greer vs the entire state of Nevada or whatever) gave him a fucking month to put up or shut up. It’s not unexpected that the judges would give shitlips two months for no real reason especially over break.

If Hardin wants to I suppose he could suggest the court issue a “everyone shut the fuck up” order, though one or two new things have been brought from his side; it hasn’t all been responses to docket insanity.

 

[AnOminous]

I was thinking along the lines of directly touching the doody, though I get how my wording could be construed as a reference to how this lolsuit is a shitshow rivaling the biggest dung-throwing festivals of India.

You'd think any honest judge would take into consideration that the plaintiff is a criminally convicted sex pest who has made a career of victimizing innocent women.

That makes you wonder what kind of corrupt, incompetent judges this case has.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

I was thinking along the lines of directly touching the doody, though I get how my wording could be construed as a reference to how this lolsuit is a shitshow rivaling the biggest dung-throwing festivals of India.

I would argue that no one should touch any poo unless directed to so by Dear Leader. But, I may be more conservative on this issue than some.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

I was thinking along the lines of directly touching the doody, though I get how my wording could be construed as a reference to how this lolsuit is a shitshow rivaling the biggest dung-throwing festivals of India.

I edited my earlier post. I forgot that handling the feces referred to us taking action. I was thinking "no it wouldn't be feces handling for Josh to do this". Too much on the mind lately, thinking about this year and next.

I added: by "we" I really meant I wish Josh would do / consider this. I did not intend to suggest anyone take any action, other than Josh and Hardin.

 

[obsdj]

Does anybody think an order to STFU is going to stop him from sperging?

We all know that nothing can or will stop him from sperging, but if there's an order in place that no new shit can be added to the docket without prior approval, it would potentially at least keep the docket (and thereby the record) somewhat clearer, that's all. He could (and obviously would) try and send new filings to the clerks, but hopefully this time around the clerks would be informed that there's fuckery afoot and they would politely direct him to the judge(s) for approval.

 

[Uzumaki]

That makes you wonder what kind of corrupt, incompetent judges this case has.

The answer is “average judges” of course. That kind.

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

You all are too impatient, Greer season isn't until March. We have to wait until we all get out our cement bricks and plank to put out the traditional electronic keyboard, don our business suits for our gym visits, and leave out a plate of green beans with chick-fil-a sauce and a big glass of chocolate milk. Then on the 7th, the judges will emerged from their chambers, look at the docket, and decide if they feel salsy. If they do, we'll get a ruling, if they don't we have to wait 7 more months.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

It occurred to me that Hardin is saying something Null told Russell long before this nightmare began:

The participants in the thread about you on my website are critics of your work. You have a propensity to delete works from public viewing at random and without warning. In order to actualize criticism of you, what you produce, and what you do in a way that would satisfy a critical audience in the future, I find it necessary to preserve the song in its entirety.

This does not infringe upon your market. The critical audience of your work is distinct from the consumer audience of your work. The people who would patronize you or your music are not going to be users of the Kiwi Farms in the thread about you. Discovery of this hosted file on the website is incidental to being critical of you, not incidental to supporting you.

The fact that Russell has changed the title of his work in an attempt to improve his image to the court only vindicates Dear Sneeder (for what little it's worth.) It's also interesting to see that Null's claim that Rusty "[has] a propensity to delete works from public viewing at random and without warning" has borne out, with Russ deleting emails and information so criticism against him cannot be supported.

 

[Moths]

I'm not sure why the judge hasn't told both parties to shut the fuck up until they get around to doing their jobs. I guess they are waiting to have another 200 open motions before they just dismiss the case ruling under an earlier motion and just moot everything else so they don't have to try and interpret Greer's spergings intioa motion then try to apply pretzel law to it.

And funnily enough the only judge activity in december was Bennet telling Barlow to deal with ECF 378 and Barlow debying 378.

Before that the last judge activity was on Sept 30th around 2 months ago on ECF 362 going by courtlistener..

So we should expect the next motion to be ruled on by about the end of february at this rate.