2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

Wyróżnienie
The Morning Visitor powiedział(a):
Whomst the fuck are they protecting? Mahatma Ghandi? Mother Teresa? Mister fucking Rogers' estate? Big Bird? Who's the most wholesome person, that if revealed to be a child rapist, could cause our Democratic Republic to crash and burn?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
People have raised comparison's to Capone's vault, but rather than there being stuff taken out prior I think the alternative and possibly most unsatisfying conclusion to Jeffrey Epstein is that he was built up to be a much more significant figure than he actually was. The circumstances surrounding his death + the mysterious island + fact he was wealthy and pictured with tons of powerful people helped the public (thanks in part to the media's stoking) create a more potent conspiracy in the absence of certainty. The "here there be dragons" of pedos.

If there is a name (or names) being protected, it's likely because that person is still alive. On the surface Bill Clinton looks like the most guilty fucking person there is but because we haven't a corroborating testimony to assert such nothing will be done. Though there's the chance that, no matter how slim, he might be completely innocent of any kid diddling and was just bizarrely attached to Epstein as a friend. But the fact I think he looks guilty is probably an image risk a lot of people want to avoid. Trump asserted he cut contact with Epstein in 2004, when we know he didn't, because 2005 was when Epstein started getting booked for trying to solicit underage girls. But did he lie to because he wanted to avoid the PR of being associated with Epstein, or because he's complicit in shadier shit?
 
Escalating Violence powiedział(a):
How much of a creepy niggas was Epstein if every photo taken with MJ he looks visibly uncomfortable? Dude does not wanna be there.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I find the idea of MJ being totally innocent of pedo shit, but because his reputation preceded him, Epstein propositioned him moments before that photo was taken, very funny.
"You fuck young boys, Michael?"
1766212129760.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Escalating Violence powiedział(a):
How much of a creepy niggas was Epstein if every photo taken with MJ he looks visibly uncomfortable? Dude does not wanna be there.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Michael most likely saw something fucked up and looked even more uncomfortable that bill was wrapping his arm around him. He probably said something along the lines, "Mickey sure looks like a little girl huh jeffry?"
 
>IMPLYING powiedział(a):
On the surface Bill Clinton looks like the most guilty fucking person there is but because we haven't a corroborating testimony to assert such nothing will be done. Though there's the chance that, no matter how slim, he might be completely innocent of any kid diddling and was just bizarrely attached to Epstein as a friend.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
The fascination around Bill Clinton featuring prominently in "The Epstein Files" is pure copium. He got busted being a sex pest and predator nearly 30 years ago, literally no liberals are defending his private behavior and may only appreciate his economic influence during the 90's.

I'm more interested in the people that may be relevant now, in the year of our lord, 2025.
 
Medic powiedział(a):
I wouldn't be surprised if Sarah dutches of York was pimping out these little girls to pedophiles if she was getting a cut. Fucking disgusting.
Wyświetl załącznik 8307927
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I mean, Sarah and Andrew had two daughters, considering the company they keep it's not a stretch to think they may have loaned them out for financial favors back in the day.

I wish instead of just redacting the child abuse pictures they'd make notes of what adults were involved. I don't want to see kids, but I am curious about who might have been messing with them. (Though maybe there were pictures of just kids? I dunno.)
 
The Morning Visitor powiedział(a):
The fascination around Bill Clinton featuring prominently in "The Epstein Files" is pure copium. He got busted being a sex pest and predator nearly 30 years ago, literally no liberals are defending his private behavior and may only appreciate his economic influence during the 90's.

I'm more interested in the people that may be relevant now, in the year of our lord, 2025.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
The shitty possible answer to who's "relevant", based on the precedent of associates who've been highlighted and and prosecuted, is unsatisfyingly low because Epstein peaked with connection-making in the 90s and early 2000s. Anyone implicated is likely to be retired, off the radar, or dead. The youngest name I've seen is Chris Tucker, who is a has-been who peaked pre-2004.

Though there's some strangeness regarding Tucker considering Rush Hour is getting a revival at the supposed behest of Trump.
1766213666255.png
 
The Morning Visitor powiedział(a):
It's in flagrant violation of the Massie/Khanna discharge petition, and subject to possibly 20 years in prison.
20251219_213509.jpg
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
They will just give a bullshit reason that is not included on that list and call it a day
Realistically, the only way these names will ever come out is either due to some guy like Assange or Snowden leaking it, or 60 years from now, when most of the people involved are dead
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole