Gradualism in action or a one-off that will be forgotten in the future, time will tell.
That genetic predisposition is a horrible thing. It cost me my family and my home, and I wasn't the one using.
Fuck man, I’m sorry to hear that.
A libertarian who isn't consistent with his own retarded political framework? Truly, I'm at a loss for words
Genetic predisposition increases the risk, but there’s still a baseline risk.
Thanks. It is hell right now seeing the woman I loved disintegrating mentally when she fired me from the job of taking care of her. I won't even talk about what it did to my daughter.
I can’t click heart twice, it’s against my code, but yeah, it sucks when people lose their minds.
This is good news. This takes away a huge campaign promise that Democrats would use to get votes and it allows dispensaries to start using the banking system. That makes them less popular as targets for armed robberies and that is good for society.
So which judge will order the board to change the name back?
This is my only small gripe here. Stalin basically sent Vlasov and his soldiers to die in Stalingrad and he said fuck that. A very similar thing happened with Friedrich Paulus where Hitler explicitly gave him a suicide mission (once again, with Stalingrad) and Paulus refused, which enraged Hitler. Vlasov wasn't a loser, he was basically fed up with Stalin at that point.
Drugs, troonery, faggotry, and niggers are all just one big lolbert loogie. You can't just politely spit out a little bit. Free yourself and let that demon jewel fly into the filth were it belongs.
You have a 1 in 15300 chance to be struck by lightning during your life; similar numbers to being shot. That doesn't stop anybody from walking about on the streets or being outside during a thunderstorm though.
This is also a good point. Right before this last election kicked off Kamala posted on twitter she'd legalize weed if she got elected. Definitely got a few extra voters out of that one, now they're fucked.
Ok so what positive thing does weed do?
generally if a white political figure has been demonized by the mainstream media in the past 75 years it's safe to assume they were based with very few exceptions.
Ok, but I was talking about the 1860s, when you had, at best, wet plate collodion photography.
He was the last president pre-Trump who made some attempt to represent the citizenry. Nixon sucked in a bunch of ways that Trump does too, but doing anything the average man voted you into office to do is unforgivable, so "historians" will always rank them among the worst presidents, and they'll get impeached however many times it takes to get rid of them.
Tweet please? I do not roam Xitter
