Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Chatgreeept has lost its damn mind.

 

[Harvey Danger]

ECF 419

And with that, Greer wins the day against Hardin, 4 filings vs 2 filings. Common Kiwi L.

If not the judges, at least the clerks have to realize that AI has accelerated the docket clutter. Even if they can't ban the use, they've got to be nearing a demand for "both sides STFU".

 

[Sneed Force One]

Where are your citations Greer!

One of the most schizophrenic arguments to date. The GreeeGPT client is bugged.

“I told this sex worker, completely unsolicited, that I will have sex with her. How could she possibly be afraid of me if we haven’t met in person?”
Of course, Greer. By that logic, I should happily agree to meet a man who calls himself ‘Murderous Knife Man’, proudly shows me his murder knife, and announces his intention to kill me.
After all, we haven’t met yet, he might be a misunderstood sweetheart.

Greer, I beg you, format your shit.

 

[Silver Coin Anon]

Uh-oh... the AI does not comprehend who it is writing for and what he has done. The quality of his filings only get worse and worse, I feel like this was him writing a rambling mess and pasting it into ChatGPT with "Make this sound legally good."

Edit: For Greer's internet harassment traffic violation had he ever met that person in real life? I think he HAS been labeled as dangerous by his victims and courts despite never meeting them.

 

[Null]

Chatgreeept has lost its damn mind.

Chat GreeePT? Chat GreeeT? GreeePT?

GPT stands for "Generative Pre-Trained Transformer", so it can standard for "Greee s'Pretty 'Tarded".

and in case you're wondering yes the site crashing constantly is from me trying to export a bunch of shit for this.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

"NEAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! DONUT LOOK AT THE REST OF MY BOOK THAT I MYSELF SUBMITTED INTO EVIDENCE! ONLY LOOK AT THIS PART THAT I CAREFULLY PICKED OUT AND CURATED! ONLY LOOK AT THE PART THAT I THINK HELPS ME! IT'S NOT OUT OF CONTEXT TRUST ME THE GUY WHO'S BEEN CAUGHT LYING MULTIPLE TIMES ALREADY!"

K.I.N.O.

 

[DHugo]

The time traveller fears the reality bender.

 

[obsdj]

That's funny. I just did a search in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF 209, attachment 1) and I see no results at all for things like "DJ" or "Colorado" that reference this guy. Nor do I see any such reference in the original complaint at ECF 3. You have explicitly blamed Defendants up until today for your failure to successfully make money off your stupid little book, but now all of a sudden it's this DJ's fault too?

Where are your citations Greer!

NO caselaw cited in ANY of today's filings. What on earth has happened to our intrepid drooler?

 

[Myrtle the Turtle]

4. Natalie Banks never met Plaintiff and cannot label him“dangerous”
It is undisputed that Plaintiff and Natalie Banks never met in person. Banks has no first hand knowledge of Plaintiff’s real-world behavior.

Plenty of people make threats against leaders and politicians having never met them in person and thats enough for Secret Service or other 3 letter agencies to determine they are dangerous. "Im gonna cum in you" is a threat of sexual violence. He lives in his own bubble of perpetual victimhood when it suits him.

Forcing publication of the entire book would cause real harm

YOU INTRODUCED HALF OF IT UNPROMPTED RODENTFACE!

 

[Sneed Force One]

Please for the love of God, can someone grant a hearing so when Hardin is asked "So which motions are we yet to rule on", he comically pulls out a large scroll from out of view, and upon unravelling it, the paper drops to the floor and bounces out of his office like a classic Warner Bros animation.

 

[DHugo]

That's funny. I just did a search in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF 209, attachment 1) and I see no results at all for things like "DJ" or "Colorado" that reference this guy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Swift_sexual_assault_trial

 

[Harvey Danger]

Where are your citations Greer!

He can't even get the Rule 106 explanation right, and you want citations???

and in case you're wondering yes the site crashing constantly is from me trying to export a bunch of shit for this.

Sounds like Greer isn't the only one who got worked up into a tard rage.

 

[Kosher Dill]

Random question on today's greeeeposting: How does it actually work with "submitting under penalty of perjury"? Can either side do that at any time to "up the stakes" as it were, or is it something you only do in specific circumstances? Does Greer's use of this make any sense at all?

 

[Some dude]

Courts have been wildin and disapprove of being reminded they have limits. MUST has no meaning.

My Christmas Spirit is telling me we should put the piteous Greee down with the kindest of all outcomes, dismissal and a lump of coal in the shape of a vexatious litigant declaration, but hands washed clean of legal fees.

 

[YouTube Autist]

 

[obsdj]

And with that, Greer wins the day against Hardin, 4 filings vs 2 filings. Common Kiwi L.

Technically two of Greer's were actually filed on Friday after everybody at the courthouse had gone home.

 

[oh no its pipkun]

I don't believe that is how it works. It's my understanding that once Hardin files a logjam motion, and if they don't respond to that in a timely fashion, a writ of mandamus can be filed with the 10th circuit appeals court. If it can be proven that there has been an unacceptable length of time since the magistrate or district judge have acted in a substantive way to move the case along they will be told to get their asses in gear and do their damn jobs.

the judges can rule on 1 motion a month to keep it going.

You have explicitly blamed Defendants up until today for your failure to successfully make money off your stupid little book, but now all of a sudden it's this DJ's fault too?

his this a "i'm not a public figure' defense? seems stupid, i know, but Greeept is really falling apart in a bad way.

 

[CEO of Gay]

Does not this entire argument fall apart if the exhibit of the full book is filed under seal? Then Null and Hardin can see it, the judge can see it, and it is on the record, but random fagots can't use PACER to deliberately avoid paying Greee for a copy.

 

[Dropa5pack]

ECF 419
Wyświetl załącznik 8290681
Wyświetl załącznik 8290683
Wyświetl załącznik 8290684

“Defendants are attempting to rehabilitate a witness by labeling Plaintiff “dangerous,”
even though she never met Plaintiff and the actual messages contradict that claim.”


I guess threatening rape like he did in that email where he said he was going to cum in Natalie doesn’t make him dangerous?

 

[oh no its pipkun]

Wyświetl załącznik 8290757
Does not this entire argument fall apart if the exhibit of the full book is filed under seal? Then Hardin can see it, the judge can see it, and it is on the record, but random fagots can't use PACER to deliberately avoid paying Greee for a copy.

null should be allowed to see it because it's the thing he's being accused of infringing.