Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Sneed Force One]

It feels like an aeon ago since a judicial determination in this rapid-fire sperging spree.

 

[Harvey Danger]

ECF 417

The closest Hardin has come to an actual shitpost filing. Yes, I know, there's reason for getting the book on record, but still.

On a related note, it's funny how Greer insists he deletes all these old documents, filings, and other important items of a legally important nature. But somehow, despite losing two laptops full of important documents and cursing his unreliable iPhone, he still has a pristine copy of an even older document: his book.

 

[Sexy Potoo]

I wouldn't be suprised if the court clerks drag Greer out into the desert and bury him just to stop him from filing.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

It feels like an aeon ago since a judicial determination in this rapid-fire sperging spree.

People think rocket docket means speed - no, it is pure quantity of motions dumped like a Saturn V dumps hot flame out its ass

 

[Post Reply]

Oh boy is he raging today.

Stupid question. Do we remember where he admitted he moved to Vegas due to his AGT dreams and plans? Is that in the Freemantle case?

Oh shit oh shit oh shit, we have it in the record IN THIS CASE!
Wyświetl załącznik 8289918

You can find it in ECF 219, Exhibit H, page 50, which is the "Appellant's Reply Brief" in the 10th Circuit case. It just so happens to be one of the very few "litigation history" files that Greer VOLUNTARILY emailed to Hardin.
Wyświetl załącznik 8289929

Russell admitted to moving to Vegas because he was going to win America's Got Talent in his initial complaint in Greer v Freemantle.

Docket for Greer v. Fremantle Productions, 2:21-cv-01905 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Greer v. Fremantle Productions, 2:21-cv-01905 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

Document 11, page 3.

 

[obsdj]

BTW, Did Greer file his idiotic declaration against the wrong thing again? He says it's against 412, Hardin's declaration. But most of his protestations are about the hooker's declaration which was way up at 401.

The closest Hardin has come to an actual shitpost filing. Yes, I know, there's reason for getting the book on record, but still.

The motion is funny, but is it actually helpful to us? Obviously pissing off Greer is a great way to get him to make mistakes. But the motion is in reference to a reply to a response to a motion to strike something that is not officially in the record or before the court because it was just a (privately-disclosed) witness disclosure. If/when the judges shift their asses to look at this motion, do any of us seriously expect either one of them to grant it? This is one of those "I dunno, seems like grandstanding" things on Hardin's scoreboard. If it proves to be the straw that makes them schedule a fucking hearing finally though, I guess it'll be worth it.

 

[Silver Coin Anon]

The problem with Greer's AI is the same with all LLMs, they have no ability to compartmentalize time and arguments like a true thinking mind. The model is building up sanctionable and even criminal statements at rapid speeds by statistically modeling comments on what Greer types into it and the filings, which the AI blows up legally like a balloon of shit which it then eats and fills up the next one with more shit.

Keep pushing him on his mistakes and lies, and make sure to seed his LLM into introducing more evidence and witnesses that don't exist that he swears under penalty of perjery are totally real. The balloon CAN get bigger before it pops. Kiwi Farms, a website, might set some AI Pro Se case law at this rate.

 

[Gorilla Milk]

Do the Germans have a word for something that is both side-splittingly hilarious and rage-inducing at the same time?

According to a german friend, there is no single word, but two phrases that fit the situation.
"Belustigend jedoch ärgerlich" and "Es ist zwar lustig obwohl es einen zur weißglut treiben könnte"

 

[obsdj]

It feels like an aeon ago since a judicial determination in this rapid-fire sperging spree.

It was less than two weeks ago, ECF 391, December 2, Barlow shooting down Greer's motion to reconsider. It does feel like forever though.

 

[DavidS877]

Four SEVENTEEN....
417 as Images.

Spoiler: 4 pages

 

[Hyacinth Bucket (Bouquet)]

Sometimes the LLM stuff makes me wonder whether I'm crazy, or it is. I'm shit at evidence so feel free to jump in and clarify, anyone less-shit-at-evidence.

My understanding is that you can call (within pretty wide boundaries) almost any witness you like, biased or not. In order to exclude the witness out of the gate, there would have to be a very strong case that that witness could not contribute anything probative.

So what if the witness is biased? Most witnesses are biased. You handle it on cross.

Russ alludes to having another witness that he would call to impeach Natalie Banks. Okay, great. But why deal with this now? She goes on the stand, you impeach her.

Is Greer even reading his AI Slop? He's filing it so fast . . .

 

[Sneed Force One]

Document 415, Exhibit A
Shitlips brazenly uses TurboScribe.AI to transcribe Natalie Banks video.
How can Shitlips possibly argue that this is an accurate transcription of her statements, with Transcription LLMs having a hallucination rate up to 16.2%

 

[Null]

How can Shitlips possibly argue that this is an accurate transcription of her statements, with Transcription LLMs having a hallucination rate up to 16.2%

it's also kind of weird because like, you can just download the YouTube transcriptions which are often quite accurate.

 

[Greasy Goblin]

Maybe he simply asked AI what AI to use to generate transcriptions, and just went with whatever it shat out?

 

[Catboy Ranch Dressing]

ECF 417 OH SHIT OH SHIT OH SHIT I WAS KIDDING

So was I...

Hardin should respond "plaintiff has yet again selectively edited his exhibits" and attach the entire book in his reply.

I didn't think that would actually be on the table.

 

[The Dude]

Once again, Mr. Greer grabs his shovel and starts digging, and it's only getting ever more desperate.

He's already dug his way throught the crust, mantle, and core, busted out in China on the other side, and somehow has figure out a way to dig through the atmosphere and pure vacuum of space. He's well on his way to the moon now.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Maybe I missed this in the thread, but I did not notice that Greee had deliberately removed “How I Falsely Became Known as Frivolous, Litigious, and Crazy” from the book title.


LOL

(EDIT: I checked, and he has done so only in his argument. The annexed book fragment contains the full title.)

 

[AnOminous]

I don't believe that is how it works. It's my understanding that once Hardin files a logjam motion, and if they don't respond to that in a timely fashion, a writ of mandamus can be filed with the 10th circuit appeals court. If it can be proven that there has been an unacceptable length of time since the magistrate or district judge have acted in a substantive way to move the case along they will be told to get their asses in gear and do their damn jobs.

The only reason I still think it's premature to do that is we're still waiting on Cox, which may moot at least some of the pending bullshit.

You really don't want to file a mandamus unless absolutely necessary because they're usually not granted and if they aren't you've pissed off the judge.

My declaration is in DIRECT opposition, which courts have recognizes as carrying greater weight in opposing mean declarations.

What a rookie mistake. Everyone knows you're supposed to call it VEHEMENT opposition. Then Bob's your uncle.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

I did not notice that Greee had deliberately removed “How I Falsely Became Known as Frivolous, Litigious, and Crazy” from the book title.

Perhaps even he is realizing he's frivolous, litigious, and crazy.

Just kidding, he probably thinks it'll make him look better.

 

[Sexy Potoo]

The only reason I still think it's premature to do that is we're still waiting on Cox, which may moot at least some of the pending bullshit.

You really don't want to file a mandamus unless absolutely necessary because they're usually not granted and if they aren't you've pissed off the judge

I would hope that if the judges are waiting for Cox v Sony to conclude, then the least they could do is give this case a "Motion to shut the fuck up" like they did to Acerthorn, if only to prevent the defense from accruing undue costs.