Active shooter at Brown University

It’s not the 1990s anybody. Wearing all black is fairly common, especially in casual environments like a University. It also has the benefit of concealing stains (e.g. blood). The clothes themselves are usually pretty unidentifiable too which helps. On the other hand, you could say if it IS considered uncommon it has the benefit of psychologically anchoring “black clothes” to the killer, who can very easily change his clothes.

Who can really put themselves in the mind of a killer though.
The black clothing could also conceal another change of clothes this shooter had underneath to delay identification by changing clothes in an area not covered by surveillance cameras.
 
To me this doesn't really glow. At least from personal experience, I don't think I've ever seen a classroom building that has security cameras in hallways and classrooms. Maybe in the entrances and vestibules, but certainly not to the extent that they can track someone closely. The building was likely empty of staff with only a couple of classrooms occupied because of finals. If he was able to critically wound everyone in the room (which sounds like a possibility) the 911 call would have been delayed. Campus cops are incompetent. It's an urban campus so he could have easily slipped out into the night and off campus grounds by crossing a street.

EDIT: It's also cold out and seeing someone on campus wearing a ski mask or balaclava isn't weird. I used to wear one while walking on campus in the winter.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Too bad that Paki Headdot Reddot is banned, I was looking forward to his edit of the suspect's skin color to Pajeet brown and suggesting that the killer was Indian like he did with the Kirk murderer (even though normal humans can't tell the difference between Pakis and Indians).
That's easy. Pakis come from England, Indians come from Canada.
 
Look at this red faced drunk.

1765681382652.png
 
The thing about surveillance and shit somehow not catching this dude is because the feds don't understand that niggas evolve. They started tapping phones, criminals found workarounds. They started tracing cellular phone calls, niggas just used burner phones. Cars switch to keyless ignition, easy peasy the car thieves just replicate the radio signals from the key fob. People put up ring cameras that only transmit video by wifi, criminals start jamming that wifi with flipper zeros and shit. They put up cameras in the NYC subways to stop turnstile hoppers, those turnstile hoppers take advantage of the winter weather and start wearing ski masks. Criminals and other people will always eventually get to the point where they end up being 1 step ahead of law enforcement in regards to this kinda shit, it's only a matter of time when that happens. Eventually we will reach a new era where criminals and shit actually start to know what they're doing, and Luigi the UHC man was really a preview of that. I personally think facial recognition got him when he pulled down his mask and had he not done that he wouldn't have been caught.
 
Okay, cameras aside - they also have a ton of witnesses. Can’t they just ask the people who were shot what the guy looked like? At least a race?
This is what is really bugging me. How many times have we seen shit like this and we would have eyewitness testimony within the hour? Did he say anything before, during, or after the shooting? Did he target people specifically or did he fire indescriminately? Then on top of it the room where we have the shooting we have no idea why the fuck students were there to begin with. The only thing new we got was they thought he might be in his 30s but not sure, how they can determine that if he was wearing all black and had a mask on.
 
Okay, cameras aside - they also have a ton of witnesses. Can’t they just ask the people who were shot what the guy looked like? At least a race?
This is what is really bugging me. How many times have we seen shit like this and we would have eyewitness testimony within the hour? Did he say anything before, during, or after the shooting? Did he target people specifically or did he fire indescriminately? Then on top of it the room where we have the shooting we have no idea why the fuck students were there to begin with.
Eyewitness testimony in shootings is notoriously unreliable. If this guy just went into a classroom and open fired, people are either shot or they're screaming and ducking, either way they're in shock.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole