Debate Dan Abrams about Trump being involved in the Epstein Files

Look, I know you may be stupid enough to believe the shabbos goy Mike Johnson, but those that can visualize a level 1 apple in their brains know that a police/FBI informant only does so if they've been caught doing the thing that the 3rd party has been accused of.
Lets see what Bradley Edwards, the laywer who represented 40 of epsteins victims has to say about it.


I understand that you seized the fbi/police informant part to deflect away from trump helping the prosecutor in 2009, because it's devastating to your case.

Sadly, i'm well versed in jewish debate tactics.
 
Feels just like twitter. Well almost, the look isn't complete without a sassy black woman eating popcorn:
Wyświetl załącznik 8163065

Nigger.
What we're missing is them posting ads for mushroom dealers and random gifs.

So if Trump helps law enforcement, he's guilty, and if he doesn't help law enforcement, he's guilty? You are fucking stupid.
No, you are mentally disabled if you think Mike Johnson's FBI informant remark to the media makes sense. Come on man.
 
Can you define what files you are talking about though?
What people in general talk about when they say "release the files" they are talking about FBI investigations, DOJ files, US attorney's office case files and other records connected to federal investigations, plea deals etc.

Of course everything in general, but the point is that much of this would be easier for him to release than grand jury files, but we were told by Trump that those were faked by the Dems and by Kash Patel that there was nothing to see in the FBI files. Either way it's clear that Trump doesn't really want you to see those.
 
No, you are mentally disabled if you think Mike Johnson's FBI informant remark to the media makes sense. Come on man.
I don't even know what Mike Johnson remark you're talking about dumb shit. I'm talking about epstein concluding that Trump was an informant in the emails you refuse to read, and the prosecutor representing his victims stating exactly that. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you? Use your ESL skills and read this.
1763004813661.png
 
I don't even know what Mike Johnson remark you're talking about dumb shit. I'm talking about epstein concluding that Trump was an informant in the emails you refuse to read, and the prosecutor representing his victims stating exactly that. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
So we're moving into the "I was pretending to be retarded all along" argument now? You're so plugged in to American politics you don't remember that Mike Johnson made this dumb remark to a reporter that Trump was actually an FBI informant and then you make that post? Come on dude. You're embarrassing yourself.
 
Of course everything in general, but the point is that much of this would be easier for him to release than grand jury files, but we were told by Trump that those were faked by the Dems and by Kash Patel that there was nothing to see in the FBI files. Either way it's clear that Trump doesn't really want you to see those.
except, that they tried to have them released already and 3 different judges said no.
Well...Explain why Trump tried to get the files released from the Grand Jury 3 times this year, in fact within the last 6 months, and no judge will do it? https://archive.is/i0p3G
Wyświetl załącznik 8162913
Berman
Engelmayer https://archive.is/WBZGe
Wyświetl załącznik 8162914

And I don't even know which judge said no but it was 3 of them. https://archive.is/ZsQbA
Wyświetl załącznik 8162916

So explain to me exactly what the fuck everyone is talking about, and how its Trump's fault that the case files won't be released.
If you're not talking about these files then again, what are we talking about? Is there something entered into evidence, or is there some kind of NSA folder you want to see or what?

Let's be honest, we all want the same thing which is transparency, thats great. What you can't do is forget this stuff and act like whatever the news and the internet retards say is happening right this second is the only thing thats happened.


Was it genuine ignorance on your part or anti trump faggotry?
 
So we're moving into the "I was pretending to be retarded all along" argument now? You're so plugged in to American politics you don't remember that Mike Johnson made this dumb remark to a reporter that Trump was actually an FBI informant and then you make that post? Come on dude. You're embarrassing yourself.
Holy mother of indian ESL reading comprehension lmfao
 
So for the record, are you denying that Trump was a law enforcement informant against epstein?
Another socratic question from a guy who has been defeated. You can read my previous posts and critically think about how Mike Johnson's statement to the media can be interpreted poorly. Just go to sleep dude you have school in the morning.
Pretending you won doesn't work very well when people can just read your post and see you contort yourself into a pretzel.

Anyway, lets clear the air a bit.

Are you for or against the release of the epstein files ?
See, this is how we know this guy is a shill. He's asking a question that was answered like 10 pages ago.
 
Another socratic question from a guy who has been defeated. You can read my previous posts and critically think about how Mike Johnson's statement to the media can be interpreted poorly. Just go to sleep dude you have school in the morning.
Are you fucking autistic? Who the fuck is talking about Mike Johnson?
 
Another socratic question from a guy who has been defeated. You can read my previous posts and critically think about how Mike Johnson's statement to the media can be interpreted poorly. Just go to sleep dude you have school in the morning.

> this nigger is afraid to answer a simple question because he already know he's gonna get destroyed instantly.

What a loser, lol. Lmao
 
Another socratic question from a guy who has been defeated. You can read my previous posts and critically think about how Mike Johnson's statement to the media can be interpreted poorly. Just go to sleep dude you have school in the morning.

See, this is how we know this guy is a shill. He's asking a question that was answered like 10 pages ago.
I would assume you're refusing to answer because answering "no" would imply the shit epstein is saying is unreliable, thus giving reason to doubt everything in the emails. But I think you are actually too fucking stupid to realize that.
 
Are you fucking autistic? Who the fuck is talking about Mike Johnson?
"trump is doing [thing that mike johnson said that i apparently dont know about]"
"[answer using mike johnsons comment in context]"
"youre fucking autistic!!! nobody is talking about him!!!"

you have two options here. either you're politically uninformed or you're being intellectually dishonest.

> this nigger is afraid to answer a simple question because he already know he's gonna get destroyed instantly.

What a loser, lol. Lmao
I accept your defeat.
I would assume you're refusing to answer because answering "no" would imply the shit epstein is saying is unreliable, thus giving reason to doubt everything in the emails. But I think you are actually too fucking stupid to realize that.
Yours also.

I do appreciate the fight here, it is fun to get into political arguments.
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Wstecz
Top Na dole