Even in "da good old days" it was bad idea to make YouTube your job if you didn't have solid plan B for time when your channel died.
Yeah thats one of main reasons why I rarely watch historytube nowdays.
Oh for sure but you could at least milk a decade or so out of a good channel before actually needing to exercise the exit plan. It seems like nowadays it's two to three years tops and that's if you make it at all.
>not psuedoehisory filled with lies aimed to fulfill a political agenda
He’s a nafoid, hes full of shit himself
That guy also arrived in my recommendations, good stuff.
They weren't at "BURN THE QUEERS" levels but the "everyone railed boys in the ass and it was seen as normal" narrative that gained popularity in the 1970s is also complete nonsense based on almost nothing. Historically it's closer to the middle.
Imagine if after Alex Jones got banned off youtube Hasan Piker created a channel called "Shmalex Jones" and it was just a single upload of a patreon video he made about how 9/11 wasn't an inside job. "Oh I thought it was important people got the reeeeal story" no dude you want to ape views off some other dude you hate being banned, you're not fucking slick.
so leather apron club was wrong in a way? Damn....history is so undecisive
Remember LAC just presented the evidence that fags weren't accepted and the evidence that he could knockdown easily which is great for a lawyer but kinda shitty for a historian so you should always seek more sources and arguments
any chud who does excellent history videos, i have seen leftist faggots on my reccomended
In order for us to label them as a chud or a libtard, they would need to inject 21st century political takes into their history videos. Doing so precludes them from making "excellent history videos". My general rule of thumb is that a history video becomes dogshit slop the instant modern politics are brought up, so I couldn't point to a single "chud" who makes anything other than dogshit slop.
Adrian goldsworthy does excellent videos and looks like a proto chud but he doesnt sperg out about modern politics
He has also done a number of appearances on my favorite tabletop wargaming channel, LittleWarsTV, and the guy who runs it is a little chuddy. I wouldn't be surprised if Goldsworthy leaned right. Helps that Goldsworthy has actually published, unlike these Wikipedia-reading chucklefucks.
No shit? His biography of Augustus is what turned my passing interest in Roman history into an autistic obsession. I assumed he was old as dirt or long dead tbh. I'm fucking shocked that he makes videos at all, let alone tabletop wargaming channel appearances. This is like learning that Hans Delbrück is alive and well, and he streams on Twitch.
Yeah man his videos while on the low end production wise does really good videos on rome his conquered and the proud series is basically a college level survey course on roman history
