💪 Tough Guys Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Enough of a stalker to sue, but also enough of a child to not show up and expect it to work without any involvement. Truly a stalker child.
 
I literally mentioned that in the feature, bro, even with a almost exact date count of how long it was since she gave up.

It was. It just didn't get anywhere.
Fair enough on the bolded, but what's bothering me is the word "won" when they didn't even get far enough to fight it out.

And the screenshot in your featured post says it's for a civil protection order. I'm willing to admit I'm retarded if WA considers that a lawsuit/part of one, but I don't remember seeing anything in the documents that indicated it was.
 
And the screenshot in your featured post says it's for a civil protection order. I'm willing to admit I'm retarded if WA considers that a lawsuit/part of one, but I don't remember seeing anything in the documents that indicated it was.
IMG_0363.jpeg

Seems to fit the bill to me. And a victory is a victory, especially regarding lawfare, even if acquired through the other party’s neglect.
 
Fair enough on the bolded, but what's bothering me is the word "won" when they didn't even get far enough to fight it out.
Victory by default is still a victory, especially in a field where TRO's are granted willy nilly and then the opposing party has to litigate it all to prove he's innocent. He literally won on the hardest part to win because Leslie was just that bad.
Seems to fit the bill to me.
I mean, I don't know what the poster is going for. The feature used a neutral "case". As for my own words, calling it a lawsuit fits the bill as well. It's certainly not a criminal case
Screenshot 2025-11-07 010635.png
You think he will invite extra bulls over to flatulate his wife’s vageen tonight in celebration?
Do you even have to ask?
 
Fatrick enjoying meatloaf
Fuck we were just speculating on his taste in music a few days ago and no one thought to ask if he enjoys Meatloaf (he probably doesn’t because he’s got bad taste in music).

Well we got little direct kino from this case, here’s hoping the MPD one makes up the comedic difference!
 
Wyświetl załącznik 8135818

Seems to fit the bill to me. And a victory is a victory, especially regarding lawfare, even if acquired through the other party’s neglect.

Victory by default is still a victory, especially in a field where TRO's are granted willy nilly and then the opposing party has to litigate it all to prove he's innocent. He literally won on the hardest part to win because Leslie was just that bad.

I mean, I don't know what the poster is going for. The feature used a neutral "case". As for my own words, calling it a lawsuit fits the bill as well. It's certainly not a criminal case
Wyświetl załącznik 8135844

Do you even have to ask?
Fine, I'm retarded. I'm just thinking like a simple civilian, when someone says they are being sued I generally think of it in terms of civil proceedings where a monetary reward is being requested. But I still refuse to call Pat a winner until he enters a livestock competition and wins prize pig.
 
Somewhat of a new entry:
Screenshot 2025-11-07 011139.png

This refers to a 2013 order:
Screenshot 2025-11-07 011910.png

The doc attached (cost me $0.50 (plus a $2.49 convenience fee), so that's the years salary from Null gone right there)

It does show that they were like 40 days late to close this case and that I was effectively been given wrong dates for whatever reason (except that they followed the wrong dates instead of the real ones, so I'm just confused)
Screenshot 2025-11-07 012936.png
 

Załączniki

Wrong again, Stalker-Child. Pat has won many things, including Lolcow of the Year 5 years running. Any evidence to the contrary is just your delusions talking, stalker.

Enjoy prison, and wait for the knock.
You are being instructed not to respond to this comment. Responding to this comment now that I have instructed you not to constitutes felony responding. Do not respond to this comment again. Mutually Assured Prison.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole