💰 Grifter Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Puck
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Nick recounting the story of meeting up with Kanye and Trump is surreal. Then you realize all the Swastika/Nazi shit Kanye was posting is because Nick implanted the idea in his head then proceeded to pour fuel into the fire.

Incredibly odd interview, feels like we are collectively in a black mirror episode.
 
People are always surprised and upset no one presses Nick on the gay stuff.
These douchy podcast bros are almost as bad as Nick. Who even watches someone like PDB with the new 'hustler/grindset' schtick? They're all just grifters propping up other grifters to grift more money.
It's a safe bet to disregard any podcast bro that calls themselves a businessman or entrepreneur.
 
Well I listened to the whole thing. Nick thread spic lies and it's clear he does if you know his lore. For near 3 hours he's allowed to weave a fantasy of how he's constantly getting fucked and how none of it is his fault.

I found interesting the part how he talked about driving around America because he was on the no fly list. I remember Mikeynomore talking about it in his video. If only he had quit then. Truly sad
Constantly getting fucked you say?
 
Fuentes spent years ankle biting Tucker Carlson and calling him a CIA asset, even as recently as last year if I’m not mistaken (correct me if I’m wrong, he probably even anklebit Tucker this year as well).

One thing that makes me skeptical about the Fuentes rehabilitation arc (which is what his series of events are, an attempt at mainstreaming him, especially with Charlie out of the picture now). What possible use does Fuentes have to the feds? Why the sudden softening of him and his movement which has a verifiable list of controversies ranging from school shooters to pedophiles?
If Fuentes were, as he claims to be ("The Most Canceled Man in America"), a true Dissident, he would not seek the "crushing" ie. total destruction of The Left™ - that is if he wished to, in the future, hedge against either party, by causing a small percentage of votes to either not be cast or be cast against the candidates he'd wish to extract concessions from. Especially not if the "crushing" were to be carried out by the "zogged-up" trump administration (Stephen Miller, Vance, ...) - After all, what's to stop the GOP from destroying him after taking care of Hasan Piker?
 
None of this is ironclad proof. But if it were true, there probably wouldn't be any either.
Bingo. You just solved the mystery yourself. If Tucker were a fed do you really think he would be so open about how many people he grew up with turned out to be feds? Do you think Tucker would be open about his father being a fed? Would a fed try to humiliate Ted Cruz, neocon fed extraordinaire if Tucker was a fed just like he is? no he wouldn't. None of it matches up or lines up except "Tucker's parents are something so automatically Tucker is the same thing." Just because one of your parents has a career doesn't mean that his son is going to have the same exact career.
 
These political pundits and operators all know exactly what they’re doing, they just don’t give a shit.
They care for sure. It's just not always so obvious exactly what they care about. Sometimes the patrons behind extremist violence are more interested in spreading domestic chaos or to distract the interest of an enemy. Sometimes they have a deliberate reason to undermine their own subject groups. Demanding that their supporters very publicly denounce Charlie Kirk in the wake of his killing is a good test of loyalty and commitment, perhaps more important than the optics.

Sometimes these considerations aren't even strategic at all.

1761847505226.png 1761847364290.png
Remember. These are some really weird fucking people.

Tucker will do or say absolutely anything so long as it damages the United States. I wonder what his deal is.
That's always been pretty obvious. Tucker Carlson wants to get paid.

Nick's skin looks so bad. He is aging like milk.
Nick isn’t a Nazi, he’s just a grifter. And a boring bloviating grifter.
Nick Fuentes is mostly safe from worries about assassination, that's for sure.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Being on other people's shows does not mean you are popular. It means you are on other people's shows.

See: any number of people who went on Joe Rogan's podcast.

You could get Fuentes on JRE and it wouldn't suddenly make the faggot popular. It would just make him a faggot more people knew the name of, the two aren't the same.

Fuentes' online reputation is so categorically blown the fuck out the only thing more unappealing about him upon closer inspection due to its blown-outedness is his asshole. I have a feeling everyone who had him on for whatever reason this glow-up tour is being done for, are going to regret having him on the exact same way people regretted having that faggot Jack Murphy on their shows.
That post wasn't about Fuentes being popular, it was about him being astroturfed after being "the most banned person on the Internet."
 
It's kind of amazing how somebody as ineffectual as catboy Nick Fuentes has actually gotten the neo con jew worshipers to reveal their true colors over something that nobody else would have payed attention to if the jews could have just ignored two people only watched by the terminally online criticize Israel.
 
One thing that makes me skeptical about the Fuentes rehabilitation arc (which is what his series of events are, an attempt at mainstreaming him, especially with Charlie out of the picture now). What possible use does Fuentes have to the feds? Why the sudden softening of him and his movement which has a verifiable list of controversies ranging from school shooters to pedophiles?
He could legit come back as a "former" radical, which would be a really smart move on his part, but most of his supporters want him to talk shit on Israel and on niggers and whatnot, so it has to be gradual.
I don't know, i felt bad when they took out Charlie Kirk but if same thing happened to Nick i wouldn't shed one single tear, i really dislike the guy - which doesn't mean i want him to get killed, just that i wouldn't be sad if it happened because he's pro-pedophilia and has protected other pedophiles he's friends with.
 
You don't need to like Nick Fuentes to acknowledge dating in the western world is very fucked up right now. Like I said, he sat back and observed more intelligent people discuss the issue, cherry-picked the parts he can market, and is parroting them. Do this enough times and ignorant audiences will trust you as a source of info.
Exactly. If we don't give Fuentes any credit, and always assume he's grifting and/or aping the bit of someone smarter (who we can't/won't cite) that'll stop his breakneck growth!
 
Tucker was probably hoping it was a strange pivot to show he's anti neo-nazis now as apart of his image reform campaign going on. 'Yeah I like Stalin he was an orthodox christian who saved his people from being exterminated by the nazis' or some shit. Maybe that idea was planted in his head by some handler, maybe hes just a sperg and wanted to say something edgy, I dunno I don't see why he would remember Stalins birthday without someone else encouraging him to.
Nick's been saying he admires Stalin for a while.
I was more surprised by the constant Christ talk by Tucker. Does he usually mention being a Christian or was he aping Nick?
 
I don't think Sam Hyde has ever been critical of Nicky in the past. Take that as you will.

But yeah it seemed as though he was done after the Ali stuff and Ethan Ralph's implosion, so it's suspicious that his popularity has skyrocketed in 2025 all of a sudden. I guess being anti-Trump works better for his grift nowadays?
He hasn't. Sam even did a pretty recent interview with Nick and just let him ramble for like over an hour without countering a single one of his points. Just sat there and either agreed with him or went "oh wow huh" over and over again.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole