Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Greer v. Moon
2:20-cv-00647— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:20-cv-00647
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
15 Wrz 2020
Terminated
22 Kwi 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
6 Sie 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 127)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
6 Sie 2024
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113
15 Maj 2024
ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112
28 Kwi 2024
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111
25 Kwi 2024
Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024)
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
GREER v. MOON
3:24-cv-00122— District Court, N.D. Florida
Docket No.
3:24-cv-00122
Court
District Court, N.D. Florida
Filed
19 Mar 2024
Terminated
10 Cze 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
16 Paź 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 155)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
16 Paź 2024
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132
15 Paź 2024
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
Greer v. Moon
2:24-cv-00421— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:24-cv-00421
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
10 Cze 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
Plaintiff
Last Filing
21 Cze 2026
Parties (4)
Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 525)
#
Date
Description
Filing
486
21 Cze 2026
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj)
RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj)
Greer v. Moon
21-4128— Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Docket No.
21-4128
Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Filed
26 Paź 2021
Terminated
15 Paź 2023
Nature of Suit
3820 Copyright
Last Filing
15 Cze 2026
Recent Filings
#
Date
Description
Filing
10010756599
19 Paź 2022
[10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
C'mon Mr. Hardin he sometimes gets 2 or 3 whole emails a day, you can't expect him to keep up with them alongside his creeping on women on LinkedIn full time job
While it's not as bad as his continued insistence on "good faith" or "excusable neglect", he's pulled this one before as well. Whenever he gets called out based on shit he's said before it's never that he's since changed his mind, or that he was lying in the first place, it's that he misspoke (or in my personal favourite example, he typoed). The implication of course being that now he's clarified what he really meant, you can no longer use what he previously said, or in layman's terms just moooove on like Greer has.
Channeling Acerthorn: it is an unsettled question of law whether a document fee of $80 is sufficient grounds for an IFP plaintiff to shift costs to opposing counsel. We need the benevolent luminaries of the 10th Appeals to weigh in on this novel dilemma!
I still can't get over how he paid the filing fee, he paid the sanction (even after it had been raised), he went out of his way to mention he had thousands of dollars to spare, but somehow $80 to mail a document is too much.
I still can't get over how he paid the filing fee, he paid the sanction (even after it had been raised), he went out of his way to mention he had thousands of dollars to spare, but somehow $80 to mail a document is too much.
I still can't get over how he paid the filing fee, he paid the sanction (even after it had been raised), he went out of his way to mention he had thousands of dollars to spare, but somehow $80 to mail a document is too much.
I still can't get over how he paid the filing fee, he paid the sanction (even after it had been raised), he went out of his way to mention he had thousands of dollars to spare, but somehow $80 to mail a document is too much.
I kind of wonder what outrageous claims he made in that application? And maybe he's realized that letting it get seen would not turn out well for him. Thus his stalling and repeating that he's decided its irrelevant nonstop until everybody agrees with him. I mean it can be taken as evidence that he's been stalking and harassing Null since at least 2018.
I still can't get over how he paid the filing fee, he paid the sanction (even after it had been raised), he went out of his way to mention he had thousands of dollars to spare, but somehow $80 to mail a document is too much.
He only paid those because he was backed into a corner and wasn't able to kick and scream to stop it. He still thinks he can weasel out of this. So long as his motion to reconsider is not ruled on, he won't budge. Then he will likely try another avenue.
Two filings in one day? Hardin can't keep getting away with it!
He's clearly got to where he feels it necessary to handhold the court through their own standard operations. "Ok judge, keep in mind, this is the procedure if you reject the tard, and this is the procedure if you don't. Call me if you need me."
Typos aside, this is a good call by Hardin (though he needs to give his paralegal a wedgie for the constant typos, or himself a vigorous one if he typed it himself) and hopefully will result in some court action before the heat death of the Universe.
In reference back to this isn't this just a blatant contempt of court to state "even monetary sanctions won't fix my behaviour yeronner".
Well I mean moreso than ignoring court orders that the judge has helpfully extended for you for months on end. It feels like one of these days Greee might get a knock from a bailiff asking politely for a non-optional tour of the court's other facilities for a couple of days before he stops fucking around and admits he has nothing, (well even moreso than hes already stipulated to).
I am enjoying the Hardin arc of reminding the court of its procedural obligations that will make it a bit more awkward for them to outright ignore them even if on appeal the 10th circuit will say something retarded like "nah we don't care about our procedures lmao".
Two filings in one day? Hardin can't keep getting away with it!
He's clearly got to where he feels it necessary to handhold the court through their own standard operations. "Ok judge, keep in mind, this is the procedure if you reject the tard, and this is the procedure if you don't. Call me if you need me."
Asking for a hearing is a good move regardless. Greer can't use an AI to generate slop for him so he's limited to his own legal capabilities, or near complete lack thereof. Russ is also retarded enough to tell on himself to the court or not understand what he's doing, similar to how he talked his way out of his own IFP status at the last one. It's also a good opportunity for Hardin to remind the court about how much shit they've let pile up.
I still can't get over how he paid the filing fee, he paid the sanction (even after it had been raised), he went out of his way to mention he had thousands of dollars to spare, but somehow $80 to mail a document is too much.
I honestly think he thinks he doesn't have to pay for something the defense wants, in spite of the rule that both sides bear their own costs, including the cost of answering the other side's questions.
It does fit with his overall, stated strategy of driving up Null's expenses to force a non-monetary settlement. It's why he whined so much when Null raised money for his defense- it put that out of reach.