Culture Empires tried to erase this queer story from ancient Palestine, but history remembers

Link (Archive)

Empires tried to erase this queer story from ancient Palestine, but history remembers​

History didn’t forget Palestine’s queerness—it erased it. Beneath centuries of empire and colonization lies a land once alive with gods in eyeliner, lovers defying gender, and dancers turning worship into art. Long before borders and scripture, this place told stories where thunder desired and love remade the world.

By the Bronze Age, in what became ancient Canaan—whose Indigenous culture is most remembered in the early history of Palestine and the Levant—queerness was divine. Melqart, the storm god of the sea, embodied beauty and power. His beloved Eshmun, a mortal healer, became immortal when he died and was reborn through Melqart’s grief. Each spring’s return marked their reunion.

From the Phoenician coast to the valleys of ancient Palestine, people honored them with festivals of music and offerings. Their story celebrated devotion strong enough to overcome death.

Those festivals were theatre and theology at once. Priests and temple attendants lined their eyes with kohl, draped themselves in fine clothes, and reenacted the lovers’ return. Among them were gallim—eunuch-priests of Astarte and Atargatis—whose voices rose in song as they danced through states of divine possession.

Midway through the rites, they shed one set of garments for another: linen robes revealing jeweled belts, veils turning into crowns, their bodies shifting between feminine and masculine adornment. Transformation itself was the ritual act—their fluidity a channel for the goddess’s own changing form, a sacred performance rather than transgression.

In the coastal towns, traveling musicians known as hazzanim – precursors to later cantors – composed songs for weddings and harvest feasts where men sang verses to one another as ritualized praise. Bronze-Age reliefs from Megiddo and Lachish show paired dancers with braided hair and mirrored adornments, moving in postures of courtship rather than battle. In the incense-lit shrines of Asherah, lovers—regardless of gender—offered honey and wine together as vows of mutual protection.

Desire was not a boundary but a bridge; to touch was to participate in creation itself.

Successive empires imposed their own hierarchies on the region, but none erased its older ways of embodying the sacred. From Assyrian and Babylonian rule through Persian, Hellenistic, Roman, Byzantine, and Islamic eras, local traditions adapted rather than disappeared. Each culture held its own relationship to gender and desire—some celebratory, others repressive—but traces of fluid devotion endured beneath them all.

As anthropologist Dionigi Albera notes, “the history of this region has been characterized by a long-term proliferation of traffic, contacts, and borrowings,” showing how ritual and belief persisted through change.

By the time the British arrived, Palestine had endured millennia of transformation, yet echoes of these embodied and poetic expressions of queerness still shaped how people understood holiness, the body, and love.

The gender-fluid rites once performed by temple attendants found echoes in the ecstatic spirituality of Sufi dhikr circles and village festivals, where movement, song, and trance blurred distinctions between body and spirit. Though not explicitly queer in doctrine, Sufipractice often created space for fluid expression and same-gender intimacy within devotion.

Mystics such as Ibn Arabi and Rumi wrote of divine love in terms that transcended gender—where the soul could be both lover and beloved, feminine in surrender and masculine in passion. Palestinian folk poetry and song carried the same undercurrent of longing, expressing affection between friends and companions in tender, gender-ambiguous verse. The forms of devotion changed, but the emotional register endured: queer desire remained a path to the sacred.

Modern queer Palestinians continue that lineage. Rauda Morcos, a poet from Akka and the first openly lesbian Palestinian public figure, founded Aswat – Palestinian Feminist Center for Gender and Sexual Freedoms in 2003. Based in Haifa, Aswat (“Voices”) became the first organization for queer Palestinian women, creating publications, workshops, and spaces for community and expression. Morcos’ poetry turns love into endurance, writing of language, body, and desire as acts of freedom. Her work appears in Poets for Palestine (2008) and other anthologies that link intimacy to resistance.

Scholar Sa’ed Atshan, in Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique, describes how queer Palestinians use care as resistance. He writes that they “embody both critique and care as intertwined projects of liberation.” For them, affection is survival under occupation.

Western headlines often label Palestine “a land of homophobes.” That narrative ignores both history and present reality. Queer Palestinians have always created networks of art and kinship despite repression. In Haifa drag shows, Ramallah studios, and diaspora collectives, they continue the creative defiance once seen in Melqart’s temples—beauty as protest, intimacy as freedom.

Recovering these stories is not invention but restoration. Queerness in Palestine is native to the land, older than empire or dogma. When someone claims queerness is “un-Palestinian,” remember the storm god who wept his lover back to life, the dancers who changed form to honor the divine, and the poets who turned survival into song.

Queerness did not begin with modern activism. It began here—with desire strong enough to shape the seasons, with ritual that made transformation holy, with love that refused to disappear. History tried to erase it. The land never did.
 
Isn't describing these as "queer" anachronistically imposing our own modern gender norms on ancient cultures? It's not like they would have thought of it/described it as such.
One might go so far as to call it some kind of "queer colonialism" or something. After all, they are claiming that indigenous culture's norms as their own.
 
Funny how he implies British colonialism ended the queer paradise of Palestine, and not Arab and Ottoman colonialism- you know, the ones who follow the religion that gives gay men the death penalty.

And of his two examples of current queer Palestinians, one is an Arab Israeli, and the other is American. lol.
 
There was a time we did that in the West as well, when women weren't stage actors or choir singers. That doesn't make the men who fill female roles 'queer'.
These people are so desperate for "queer" having relevance in history that they claim anything without its proper context can be queer.
 
By the Bronze Age, in what became ancient Canaan—whose Indigenous culture is most remembered in the early history of Palestine and the Levant—queerness was divine. Melqart, the storm god of the sea, embodied beauty and power. His beloved Eshmun, a mortal healer, became immortal when he died and was reborn through Melqart’s grief. Each spring’s return marked their reunion.
This is completely made up. Eshmun killed himself because he just wanted to hunt, bro, but Ishtar insisted he fuck her, so he cut off his own dick and bled out/hacked himself to death. I can find no references to Melqart and Eshmun being gay homos.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if Canaanite religious customs were strange or abominable by modern standards but I am skeptical about the claims this article is making about a people who ceased to exist over two thousand years ago. It's not like anyone outside of scholars on the subject can dispute them or that historical revisionism in the service of legitimizing "progressive" beliefs is unheard of.
Listen Chud, nobody cares about child sacrifice or eating virgins alive.
They had some gay demon gods and genderfreak cult leaders, that's real progress #yass

but the unfaithful kikes left some of them around, who eventually became the Phoenicians,
Listen goy, God is all-knowing and whatnot, but did he ever consider that maybe keeping just a few Caananites and Amalakites around as Golems to fuck with our other enemies could be beneficial strategy?
 
These people are so desperate for "queer" having relevance in history that they claim anything without its proper context can be queer.
What annoys me about the idea of cultural significance of being queer is the idea that it was always seen the same, as if every culture had all the same ideas as modern people do.

For instance, I can see where in history being gay might have been condemned because of the fear that people might not have had sex to procreate more people to till the fields.

Even half a century ago, being queer was probably a matter of anything from "privacy of your home" to "open secret that's not bothering anyone". It was never about affirmation or public identity or pissing off whatever daddy figure.
 
This article is so full of lies and misinterpretation of facts that I don't even know where to start to correct it. Most countries in the ancient Near East were highly patriarchal and highly no-homo. This idiot is just taking normal (ritualistic) behaviour by men and claiming it's gay because it doesn't fit his very narrow definition of what straight behaviour should be. Also, in countries like this you had male singers and male dancers because women weren't allowed to dance or sing in public, partly for their own protection. There was a time we did that in the West as well, when women weren't stage actors or choir singers. That doesn't make the men who fill female roles 'queer'.
The presence of certain gender-bending sects would not be terribly surprising, as that seems to pop up in paganistic rituals. The author mentions the Gallim, who were adherents of a sect worshipping the Goddess Astarte/Cybele. They were eunuchs who paraded around in women's clothing.

This seems to be related to the story of a handsome courtier, Combabus, escorting a nymphomaniac Queen Stratonice of Syria, who had a vision to build a temple to Ishar/Astarte/Hera/Demeter/Cybele. He knew the Queen had the hots for him, so he castrated himself and put his severed genitals in a box in the palace to avoid any issues. When they got back, the queen accused him of seducing her, so he opened the box in front of the king and was rewarded for his devotion. Later, a visiting woman fell in love with Combabus and then killed herself when she realised he was a eunuch, so from then on Combabus dressed up in womens' clothing to prevent this happening again. Lucian of Samosata (among others) linked this to the reason the Galli were cross-dressing eunuchs. Whether or not this is actually why is up for debate, but it's a good example of how something that looks like "it's a cult of transgender priestesses" could be something more akin to the Skopsy.

There may have been some ritualised homosexual behaviour in Canaan. The Hebrew word "קָדֵשׁ" qadesh is typically translated as sodomite but more accurately seems to mean something like "male temple prostitute" (the root is the same for "sanctified one", "one who is holy", "consecrated one" etc) and pops up in several situations in the Bible; compare the King James Bible to modern translations -
There shall be no ritual harlot of the daughters of Israel, or a perverted one of the sons of Israel./No Israelite, whether man or woman, may become a temple prostitute. Deuteronomy 23:17

And there were also sodomites in the land, and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the Lord cast out before the children of Israel./There were even male shrine prostitutes in the land; the people engaged in all the detestable practices of the nations the Lord had driven out before the Israelites. 1 Kings 14:24

And he broke down the houses of the sodomites that were by the house of the Lord, where the women wove hangings for the Asherah pole./He also tore down the quarters of the male shrine prostitutes that were in the temple of the Lord, the quarters where women did weaving for Asherah. 2 Kings 23:7
The female equivalent is "קְדֵשָׁה" qedesha. These words are very specifically different to the words used to refer to regular prostitutes. The thing is though, while Hebrew and Greek sources seem to agree on this, there's not decisive evidence that sacred prostitution (female or male) was actually practiced in ancient Canaan. It's possible that it was, but it's also possible that these were e.g. sworn temple maidens or priestesses and it was the ancient Israelites slandering their enemies (who were basically the same as them, but hadn't switched over to worshipping only Yahweh). They might be metaphorical prostitutes (prostituting themselves to other Gods). It could also possibly be that there were secular prostitutes of both the male and female variety plying their wares in temples where they could get more custom. It's hard to say definitively. To look at a similar example, the Sumerian assinnu
This has been variously been interpreted to mean that the assinnu was a eunuch, transvestite, male cult-prostitute, or pederast. However, none of these interpretations can unambigously be supported by reference to other texts [therefore] some scholars hold that the assinnu was simply an actor who took a female role in cultic dramas.

It's a similar thing to how the author makes assumptions about Ibn Arabi and Rumi - some poems definitely seem gay, but it's also fully possible that they were writing about spiritual love. Ultimately there's enough there where you could question it, but the most likely response to "was this region worshipping queerness during a particular period" is "no, but some probably went on without being officially sanctioned, like the Bacha Bazi in Afghanistan".
 
It's possible that it was, but it's also possible that these were e.g. sworn temple maidens or priestesses and it was the ancient Israelites slandering their enemies (who were basically the same as them, but hadn't switched over to worshipping only Yahweh). They might be metaphorical prostitutes (prostituting themselves to other Gods). It could also possibly be that there were secular prostitutes of both the male and female variety plying their wares in temples where they could get more custom.
In the Epic of Gilgamesh, it's a woman associated with a temple to go sleep with Enkidu and turn him "human" by separating him from the wild animals. She's pretty well accepted as a temple prostitute. The idea of the temple or sacred prostitute is pretty common in Ancient Near Eastern cultures so it would not be surprising at all that it appeared in Canaan and that the Hebrew Bible tried to dissociate itself from it (just as the Hebrew Bible dissociates itself from Ancient Near Eastern cosmogony in Genesis 1 by subordinating and de-divinizing Tiamat).
 
It's always funny when they try to change history to reflect queer or tranny ideology. Like in rural Muslim mountain villages in Kosovo, Macedonia, Albania. Especially among the Albanians, women don't leave the house really or family hamlet. They are to stay home, take care of the household and wait for your husband to return. Now what if your husband dies and there no males in your household. Well women is now a man and can leave the house to go market or handle affairs like a man would in the community( funerals, village cafe, etc). This is type of thing that say is queer history but had nothing to do with sexuality, just saving face in society.
 
What annoys me about the idea of cultural significance of being queer is the idea that it was always seen the same, as if every culture had all the same ideas as modern people do.
Queer is just the word for what's out of the socially expected, but without any context so they can claim it. For example, this:

It's always funny when they try to change history to reflect queer or tranny ideology. Like in rural Muslim mountain villages in Kosovo, Macedonia, Albania. Especially among the Albanians, women don't leave the house really or family hamlet. They are to stay home, take care of the household and wait for your husband to return. Now what if your husband dies and there no males in your household. Well women is now a man and can leave the house to go market or handle affairs like a man would in the community( funerals, village cafe, etc). This is type of thing that say is queer history but had nothing to do with sexuality, just saving face in society.

Remember also when they said Jo March ("Little Women") was trans just because she was a tomboy. For them, a woman who won't get married because she has other plans is "queer" and I've seen perfectly straight women claim themselves to be queer just because they didn't marry. They are this absurd.

if you published this article in gaza there's a good chance they would straight up kill you for it
We need to catch up and make it punishable with death in every region of the world.
 
yeah, mediterranean paganism was really gay. no one has ever erased that. christianity had a field day with it, they didnt want people to forget the pagans were GAY AF
 
how gay modern Tel Aviv is.
All you see on every corner is stuff like this
EQm-D47W4AAbUlg.jpg
 

Załączniki

  • EQm-D47W4AAbUlg.jpg
    EQm-D47W4AAbUlg.jpg
    247,3 KB · Wyświetlenia: 2
For instance, I can see where in history being gay might have been condemned because of the fear that people might not have had sex to procreate more people to till the fields.
The main taboos were because disease, and damage to the children.
It's always funny when they try to change history to reflect queer or tranny ideology. Like in rural Muslim mountain villages in Kosovo, Macedonia, Albania. Especially among the Albanians, women don't leave the house really or family hamlet. They are to stay home, take care of the household and wait for your husband to return. Now what if your husband dies and there no males in your household. Well women is now a man and can leave the house to go market or handle affairs like a man would in the community( funerals, village cafe, etc). This is type of thing that say is queer history but had nothing to do with sexuality, just saving face in society.
common in many hunter societies as well. There have always been mechanisms for women to take the roles needed to keep society running - the Inuit were ok with women hunters if a man died. Many tradesmen in medieval times had the business taken over by the wife of the man died. There were almost always certain taboos or conventions around it. But sensible, it provides a way of keeping things running
 
It's always funny when they try to change history to reflect queer or tranny ideology. Like in rural Muslim mountain villages in Kosovo, Macedonia, Albania. Especially among the Albanians, women don't leave the house really or family hamlet. They are to stay home, take care of the household and wait for your husband to return. Now what if your husband dies and there no males in your household. Well women is now a man and can leave the house to go market or handle affairs like a man would in the community( funerals, village cafe, etc). This is type of thing that say is queer history but had nothing to do with sexuality, just saving face in society.
The Sworn Virgins are a bit of a funny case. If you check out this article by Predrag Šarčević and translate the bits in the red boxes, you can see there was somewhat of a range. In some cases the Sworn Virgins insisted they were always supposed to have been born men, and everyone referred to them with male names and male pronouns, and could worship in the male part of the Mosque. In other cases they wore men's clothes but were still definitively women just acting as men, and received female funerary rites.

Sometimes they'd be made into "sons" by their parents if there were no boys (a bit like the Samoan Faʻafafine, but in the opposite direction), sometimes they'd choose to become one and remain as such even if male heirs were eventually conceived. Occasionally it was a way of breaking off an engagement without starting a blood feud (and if they later stopped being a "sworn virgin", that was grounds for a blood feud from the snubbed man's family). It's quite a complicated phenomenon and it does appear in places that the sworn virgins were seen as being different to a woman rather than just "a woman we've decided is going to act like a man for a bit".
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole