Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Found this one responding to the success of the new Demon Slayer movie and why young people prefer it over woke stuff.

Screenshot 2025-09-26 012636.webp

Screenshot 2025-09-26 012646.webp
 
A decade of "echo chamber" propaganda, and SJWs have gone from seeing dissenters as "privileged", to "Nazis" who "should be punched", to "evil" and "deserving of murder" ... just for dissent. I do not like that escalation. Who knows how delusional and crazy the average member of The Cult of Progress could be from 10 more years of indoctrination?
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
A decade of "echo chamber" propaganda, and SJWs have gone from seeing dissenters as "privileged", to "Nazis" who "should be punched", to "evil" and "deserving of murder" ... just for dissent. I do not like that escalation. Who knows how delusional and crazy the average member of The Cult of Progress could be from 10 more years of indoctrination?
Gamergate was right about game journos.
 
Gamergate was right about game journos.
What'd the non-SJWs say about journos during that whole circus?

Social justice is all about subversion:
That "it's OK to be racist against whites" or "can't be racist against whites" BS assumes that "racism" is "privilege plus power", and that status -- such as "privileged" or "marginalized" -- is a collective thing. Seems that SJWs think all white people are automatically and collectively responsible for any and all misdeeds of a number of whites throughout space and time. So they think that hating someone or treating someone like crap -- just for who one is -- is justified... if one happens to be deemed "oppressor".

As for that "whites were the first illegal immigrants" BS, I doubt natives were some united nation with anti-immigration law, who lived in harmony like in some Di$ney movie. The Cult of Progress really wants to rationalize opening the floodgates to the endless waves of military-aged men from underdeveloped places to destabilize developed places. Speaking of, I saw this book for kids titled "Separate Is Never Equal" and I got the hunch that the clearly "woke" book was trying to rationalize unchecked mass immigration.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
What'd the non-SJWs say about journos during that whole circus?


That "it's OK to be racist against whites" or "can't be racist against whites" BS assumes that "racism" is "privilege plus power", and that status -- such as "privileged" or "marginalized" -- is a collective thing. Seems that SJWs think all white people are automatically and collectively responsible for any and all misdeeds of a number of whites throughout space and time. So they think that hating someone or treating someone like crap -- just for who one is -- is justified... if one happens to be deemed "oppressor".

As for that "whites were the first illegal immigrants" BS, I doubt natives were some united nation with anti-immigration law, who lived in harmony like in some Di$ney movie. The Cult of Progress really wants to rationalize opening the floodgates to the endless waves of military-aged men from underdeveloped places to destabilize developed places. Speaking of, I saw this book for kids titled "Separate Is Never Equal" and I got the hunch that the clearly "woke" book was trying to rationalize unchecked mass immigration.
TLDR the said the game journos were all nepotistic retards who sucked off major corps so they could get a higher job within them. I may not agree with most of gamergate in retrospect but I agree with that.
 
Remember how SJWs seem to think "all of a kind are alike" -- that is, that collectivist thinking? Turns out "woke" take that kind of thinking so far it seems they think just being part of a "marginalized group" magically instills someone with the histories of "oppression" and "cultural heritage" of the "marginalized group" as well. Like SJWs may treat black people as if they have some kind of magical collective memory they can tap into of all the mistreatment -- real or imagined -- of all black people anywhere ever.

Check out what they have to say about conservative Christians.
Just because a SJW makes a BINGO card of unpleasant truths they hear (or strawmen they dream up) doesn't mean "woke" is right.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
A decade of "echo chamber" propaganda, and SJWs have gone from seeing dissenters as "privileged", to "Nazis" who "should be punched", to "evil" and "deserving of murder" ... just for dissent. I do not like that escalation. Who knows how delusional and crazy the average member of The Cult of Progress could be from 10 more years of indoctrination?
It'll end with another Jonestown.
 
They only make fun of Christianity because they don't have to worry about the local youth pastor killing them in the street like a dog.
If it's pointed out that SJWs commit more acts of political violence than non-sJWs, SJWs may either deny that* or claim that "both sides" are equally as violent. Endless BS.

* for example:

user-wi8zq8vc6t on a news report powiedział(a):
Wow, here it is:

Trump’s example of dangerous extremists. Old Vietnam veterans, and young people wearing costumes like they were gonna go to comic con.

When will maga understand that the current leadership is really unAmerican and extremist?

Just found an in-your-face example of such doublespeak (though not on Reddit) with the first and third quotes below.
 
Is shit like that makes me think that maybe we should act more like sandniggers. Not like beheading people and parading their corpses type shit but start chimping out like them so these fags stop being comfortable distorting the teaching of christ to fit his retarted ideas.
Y'know now that I think about it, I am reminded of the countless Bounqyisha fights I observed in HS and no, I don't think I could compete with that.
 
If it's pointed out that SJWs commit more acts of political violence than non-sJWs, SJWs may either deny that* or claim that "both sides" are equally as violent. Endless BS.

* for example:



Apparently its the right-wing that commits more acts of political violence and murders. I, however, find that sketchy because the only source I can find on it is from the ADL. And even then, they don't show the proof of their results (or I couldn't find it) in the article they posted. So it makes me wonder if they only count certain things as political violence (antifa punching random people in the street not counting for example). Feel free to fact check me
 
Apparently its the right-wing that commits more acts of political violence and murders. I, however, find that sketchy because the only source I can find on it is from the ADL. And even then, they don't show the proof of their results (or I couldn't find it) in the article they posted. So it makes me wonder if they only count certain things as political violence (antifa punching random people in the street not counting for example). Feel free to fact check me
That is basically the case. A lot of “right-wing violence” reports can be summarized as taking any crime committed by someone affiliated with “right-wing” groups and marking them as politically motivated. I remember a few particularly blatant cases of gaming the numbers like some guy killing his uncle to run off with his aunt, and the case of a skinhead who converted to Islam killing his fellow skinhead roommates when they made fun of him for it. They sometimes even include rude posts on the internet as “violence and hate crimes” to make the situation seem worse. On the flip side, it's painfully common for these databases to refuse to consider acts of left-wing violence as such because the perpetrator didn't proclaim that he was doing it based on ideology, even if the background information and choice of targets would make that motivation abundantly clear.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole