Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Despite the Court giving Mr. Greer what can only be described as the deal of a lifetime, Mr. Greer refused to pay for months on end and continued to drive up Defendants costs.

so true

When this case inevitably concludes with a final judgment in their favor, Defendants will seek reimbursement of all of their litigation costs and attorney’s fees in their entirety.

overconfidence is an insidious killer

Defendants seek less than Mr. Greer spends annually on prostitutes

random.txt

 

[Irene and 22 others]

Will anyone else feel disappointed if Greer files more soulless AI slop with the court tomorrow? The only real chance of funny is if the AI hallucinates a case citation that Greer doesn't catch and gets called out on it. Greer's self-authored legal filings always find some new and interesting way to surprise and delight everyone here.

ECF 364

Fuck yeah! Every last cent!

This will definitely get the gimp-faced retard to respond promptly.

 

[FamicomGorby]

Really hoping for a debtors exam with this, it's the only way Greer can really prove to the court that he only has $3.50 in the bank and 90% of his income goes to giving women on Instagram $1 each.

 

[obsdj]

ECF 364

Am I overlooking it because I’m tired and horizontal and reading this on my phone, or did Hardin not even remind the court of the whole change-of-venue Florida-and-back clusterfuck that occurred as a direct result of the Steve Taylor lie?

 

[Bogliacci]

Hardin, you've done it again you slick sonuvagun

 

[DavidS877]

364
Images and Single PDF

Spoiler: 14 pages

paynull.lol:

 

[not william stenchever]

No, they cannot. There's a process that Null will likely have to go through to collect (unless Greer decides to pay despite not having the money and claiming on multiple occasions that he never would), but he can have Greer's wages garnished until the debt is paid. The time and money spend doing that isn't worth it financially, but that's not going to stop Null from pursuing it.

Null has stated that he will hire Ethan Ralph to collect from Shitlips and will just let Ralph keep the torta money. I hope that each collection is livestreamed.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Am I overlooking it because I’m tired and horizontal and reading this on my phone, or did Hardin not even remind the court of the whole change-of-venue Florida-and-back clusterfuck that occurred as a direct result of the Steve Taylor lie?

He sorta briefly covered it

 

[obsdj]

He sorta briefly covered it
Wyświetl załącznik 8033866

…Seems insufficient, considering they (the Utah judges) wouldn’t even be dealing with this fucktard if it weren’t for that lie. Oh well.

 

[FamicomGorby]

…Seems insufficient, considering they (the Utah judges) wouldn’t even be dealing with this fucktard if it weren’t for that lie. Oh well.

Hardin was limited to ten pages, which this filing is exactly. Not enough room to get into the retransfer when there are other more concrete things to bring up.

 

[obsdj]

Hardin was limited to ten pages, which this filing is exactly. Not enough room to get into the retransfer when there are other more concrete things to bring up.

He could’ve trimmed some of his cute little comments about brothels and prostitutes. Reminding the court that Greer has money for hookers without also reminding the court of the costliness not only to the defense but to the courts themselves of the “eager” witness who was dead seems shortsighted.

 

[Pee Cola]

I realise that since ECF#364, this is moot and it appears that Hardin was thinking along similar lines to myself, but imma gonna address it anyway as there are worthwhile points to be discussed (with a bonus mea culpa).

Sorry, this is retard shit. Everything Hardin has put before the court is something that needs to be there for the inevitable appeal.

I note that in ECF#364, Hardin put forward the entire laundry list documenting Greee's history of obfuscation and subterfuge without using overly florid or antagonistic language. As much as I enjoy seeing Hardin off the leash, the District Court of Utah seems less enthused.

It has to be pointed out or he can't even use it on appeal.

Yes, and done so in a businesslike manner as per ECF#364.

You're basically just saying surrender to a retard.

In hindsight I see that I didn't make myself clear, and that my lack of clarity implied that Hardin shouldn't take the opportunity to remind the Court of Greee's wilful recalcitrance at all, whereas what I meant is that I agree with @obsdj's point that when putting forth his case for sanctions, Hardin should restrain himself and stick with a businesslike filing instead of something a bit showboaty.

It's all academic now; ECF#364 is comprehensive and businesslike, just as I'd hoped it would be.

He could’ve trimmed some of his cute little comments about brothels and prostitutes. Reminding the court that Greer has money for hookers without also reminding the court of the costliness not only to the defense but to the courts themselves of the “eager” witness who was dead seems shortsighted.

I don't consider these comments to be "cute" at all, they're statements of fact. I also didn't see any of the more provocative language used in some previous filings, which is what I was getting at when I replied to your earlier post. I wonder how much of this restraint was in order to bring the filing down to 10 pages, as opposed to not wanting to put the Court further offside.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Reminding the court that Greer has money for hookers without also reminding the court of the costliness not only to the defense but to the courts themselves of the “eager” witness who was dead seems shortsighted.

I presume Bennett is aware of what State he lives in. Admittedly, I could be optimistic.

 

[FamicomGorby]

He could’ve trimmed some of his cute little comments about brothels and prostitutes. Reminding the court that Greer has money for hookers without also reminding the court of the costliness not only to the defense but to the courts themselves of the “eager” witness who was dead seems shortsighted.

I mean I guess, but when dealing with a court that's tardguarding it's probably harder to sell them on charging Greer now for all costs of the case since the retransfer up to this point.

Hardin/Null do intend to go after Greer for all legal expenses incurred over the course of the case, it's not like they're leaving money on the table. Which really is none since Greer is basically broke, but it's principal of it.

 

[BIG BILL HELL'S]

Wyświetl załącznik 8033830

I can only hope that when @Potentially Criminal reads through this, he affects Vince McMahon's voice when he gets to footnote 7: YOUR HONOR, RUSSELL GREER NOT ONLY FUCKS WHORES, HE FUCKS WHORES TO THIS DAY!!!

 

[The Un-Clit]

ECF 364
Wyświetl załącznik 8033769

Wyświetl załącznik 8033773
Wyświetl załącznik 8033775

This is a great read. Hardin laid out every bit of Greee's shifty, greasy behaviour with regards to the Corpse known as Steve who was 'eager to testify' AND his shitty behaviour when given a slap on the wrist with the previous sanctions yet stalled and refused to pay it. Hardin did so in a clear way with minimal (but appropriate where applied) snark, and laid out a good arguement for costs, and pointed out Shitlips is no longer IFP and can and should be made to pay a realistic sanctioned amount. He really lays down the hammer on the fraudulent claims of Russhole being poor too.

I don't quite get where 'a strong case could be made for claiming 600k' comes from, but since this was just hyperbole I think the judges will let it slide.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I don't quite get where 'a strong case could be made for claiming 600k' comes from, but since this was just hyperbole I think the judges will let it slide.

It comes from a recognized idea that you should be punished more from fraud/wrongdoing than you gain from it. However, considering Russ didn't yet gain the financial amount he seeks, it was wise to just leave it as a pointed comment.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Wyświetl załącznik 8033840

Hardin, you've done it again you slick sonuvagun

Deceased but Eager Witness would be a good username or band name.

my fucking sides my god spacex cancel starshit we can just launch a billion tons directly


this is a perfect way to say "what the fuck were you thinking" and "see, anyway, he just shat all over you"

classic

 

[Bogliacci]

classic

Might as well lock the thread now while we're ahead until the next filing.

 

[Harvey Danger]

…Seems insufficient, considering they (the Utah judges) wouldn’t even be dealing with this fucktard if it weren’t for that lie. Oh well.

That's one of two complaints I have as well. The entire cost of dealing with the jurisdiction re-transfer should be tallied up and laid at Greer's feet. It shouldn't have needed much more space in the main argument, just a reminder that it was cited in the transfer decision.

Letting Greer off the hook with just 3.6 hours billed for the Motion of Adverse Inference is a bigger gift to him than Hardin's hourly rate is to Null. It doesn't even include time spent investigating Steve's fate, because Hardin requested some of that in the first sanction. And Hardin was objectively not compensated for that time, thanks to the District judge's discount.

Spoiler: Monday morning armchair lawyering

My other complaint is this:



COME ON

IANAL, and I am talking out my ass on this one, and I know Hardin's trying to be scrupulous about billings. But this is too conservative. There's no harm in listing out the additional time as a separate number, offering it to the judge as an "if you want to throw the whole book at Greer" option.

We already know tard shields are in place and Barlow is willing to reduce sanctions for no reason. Give him a higher number he can "knock down", so he at least looks like he's taking pity on the poor retard, and doesn't cut down the main amount.

It doesn't hurt to ask; you have been explicitly told to ask. The worse Barlow can do is say no to the additional, neatly separated-out amount.

I don't know if it looks bad that nearly half of Hardin's requested amount comes from writing up this bill. Is that normal? He's claiming to have spent 2x as much time drafting this memo this than he did dealing with the Steve issue, or 7x more time than dealing with the SPO violation accusation.