📚 Megathread The Pooner Zoo - A thread for collecting wild Pooners and posting OC Pooners, and anything Pooner related

Wyróżnienie
Muskcarpone powiedział(a):
I used to believe that too, actually, until a feminist convinced me that it I see pooners as mere victims of the patriarchy, I deny that they would have the same agency as troons. Since then I am convinced that it would be sexist if I went easier on them then I do with troons.

Hence I help overcoming sexism and the patriarchy with each titty joke. You are welcome.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
If sexism, patriarchy, and even sexist jokes were the True and Honest Cause of pooning and titty-chopping, you would expect there to be a lot more pooners going back, say, 80 years, not fewer.
scathefire powiedział(a):
I’m surprised they even exist to begin with, non-binary is such an overwhelmingly white phenomenon. It’s not like black women need to become genderspecial in order to obtain oppression points, thus most of them never come to that conclusion.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
On the contrary, it lets them be The Most Oppressed Groid in the Ghetto, which I hear is like being the Coolest Monkey in the Jungle.
 
unwieldy_object powiedział(a):
Unless I've missed a very recent shift the pooner lawyer went "haha I only did it to infiltrate the Terfs" and is now despiced by both troons, poons and Terfs.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Everybody hates her now but as of me writing this, she is currently claiming that the infiltration storyline was another misdirection and she is a terf detranser now. She might switch at any time again, so she could be both prosecution and defense in the "tits vs poon" case, depending on her mood at the moment.
 
Muskcarpone powiedział(a):
Everybody hates her now but as of me writing this, she is currently claiming that the infiltration storyline was another misdirection and she is a terf detranser now. She might switch at any time again, so she could be both prosecution and defense in the "tits vs poon" case, depending on her mood at the moment.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Bruh. I must’ve been completely right when I compared her to Jamie Shupe. She’s a complete fucking nutjob.
 
Ed Special powiedział(a):
If sexism, patriarchy, and even sexist jokes were the True and Honest Cause of pooning and titty-chopping, you would expect there to be a lot more pooners going back, say, 80 years, not fewer.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
In the olden days women would dress up as men and take on male names but there was none of this nonsense. This is absolutely a fetish.
 
Rarely, yes. The incidence of women crossdressing for the benefits of male back when society was actually as sexist, misogynistic, etc. as feminist grifters claim it to be now is grossly exaggerated by revisionist pseudohistorians in academia.
 
Ed Special powiedział(a):
revisionist pseudohistorians
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
The very same people exaggerate the extent of misogyny in the past while also purposely remaining ignorant to the broader context of said soggy knees.

Most people had to endure what today we would describe as abuse or oppression to greater or lesser extent.

Mind you most of that is irrelevant today; I do not feel the flogging my peasant ancestors endured nor does the feminist cunt feel the discomfort of whatever trivial bullshit she wishes to dreg up from the past.
 
A lot of incidents of crossdressing in order to reach a secondary goal are also not permanent lifestyle choices. I remember a story about a girl that did so to serve in the civil war and then went back to dresses after and went west to find a husband lmao. Such things were disguises for other means and likely not even desirable for the individual aesthetically, like many people view fashion today.

Until relatively recently in history, "fashion" as a purely aesthetic pursuit was really only for a small subset of the well to do. For everyone else it was entirely utilitarian, dictated by class, means, and often your role/job. Even a lot of the nobility of yesteryear likely scoffed at dandies/fashionistas for being gaudy and flippant about spending on clothing. The idea that fashion and clothing are personal expressions of your individuality and must be expressed for utmost happiness is marketing for an industry. It's no more silly to think you have to dress a certain way than it is to think you have to drive a certain car or have the "right" phone in order to be fulfilled.
 
Kujo Jotaro powiedział(a):
The very same people exaggerate the extent of misogyny in the past while also purposely remaining ignorant to the broader context of said soggy knees.

Most people had to endure what today we would describe as abuse or oppression to greater or lesser extent.

Mind you most of that is irrelevant today; I do not feel the flogging my peasant ancestors endured nor does the feminist cunt feel the discomfort of whatever trivial bullshit she wishes to dreg up from the past.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
A large proportion of the restrictions the Bible proscribes for women were created as reforms to protect women from the worst abuses they'd been facing from men, specifically. Of course, the modern feminist mind that has never experienced real violent misogyny fails to comprehend that, yes, Rome in its early years actually had the kind of forced breeding camps that they read about in their porn novels (and that trannies like Anal Violence openly fantasize about creating IRL), men did regularly rape and impregnate women in pagan societies and leave them to figure out how to care for themselves and the child, and biblical law was specifically meant to combat this sort of misogynistic degeneracy.
 
Paper Machete powiedział(a):
Until relatively recently in history, "fashion" as a purely aesthetic pursuit was really only for a small subset of the well to do. For everyone else it was entirely utilitarian, dictated by class, means, and often your role/job. Even a lot of the nobility of yesteryear likely scoffed at dandies/fashionistas for being gaudy and flippant about spending on clothing. The idea that fashion and clothing are personal expressions of your individuality and must be expressed for utmost happiness is marketing for an industry. It's no more silly to think you have to dress a certain way than it is to think you have to drive a certain car or have the "right" phone in order to be fulfilled.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It's all ego, a self obsessed attempt to project an image into the world. One of the quickest ways to sniff someone like this out is to say "I don't really like tattoos", because almost all of these people have tattoos, and they take that mundane and mild opinion as a personal insult.

One way to be reductive about troon and poonism is to state it's all a fetish(a lot of it is), another way to be reductive is to make the claim that it's all a neurotic compulsion to manage the world's view of the self.

Anyways, yall ever get self conscious about your balls?
441.jpg
 
Paper Machete powiedział(a):
A lot of incidents of crossdressing in order to reach a secondary goal are also not permanent lifestyle choices. I remember a story about a girl that did so to serve in the civil war and then went back to dresses after and went west to find a husband lmao. Such things were disguises for other means and likely not even desirable for the individual aesthetically, like many people view fashion today.

Until relatively recently in history, "fashion" as a purely aesthetic pursuit was really only for a small subset of the well to do. For everyone else it was entirely utilitarian, dictated by class, means, and often your role/job. Even a lot of the nobility of yesteryear likely scoffed at dandies/fashionistas for being gaudy and flippant about spending on clothing. The idea that fashion and clothing are personal expressions of your individuality and must be expressed for utmost happiness is marketing for an industry. It's no more silly to think you have to dress a certain way than it is to think you have to drive a certain car or have the "right" phone in order to be fulfilled.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I forget which one it was, but I remember seeing some gender philosopher or quack doctor or something talking about clothes and saying "When everyone gets dressed in the morning, the most important thing they think about is their gender".
For a start, that's assuming we all have a big dressing up box full of different gendered costumes. When most normal people get dressed, they don't think about how they feel inside, they consider what's appropriate for their surroundings. Is it cold or hot? Is it raining or dry? Is there a dress code where I'm going? Will I need particular clothes for work, like a hard hat and a hi-viz vest or a uniform? And then after all that, maybe, which items will go well together and will the whole outfit look good?
 
If you've ever wanted to know what a furry pooners room looks like
(Ignore the thumbnail yes shes a zoomer and yes shes British)

They also refuse to take out the trash because she had surgery on her knee as a kid and claims that it hurts too much, despite owning multiple bikes and a bunk bed.
 
KingFrampt powiedział(a):
If you've ever wanted to know what a furry pooners room looks like https://youtube.com/watch?v=eilKsKFv_GE:387 (Ignore the thumbnail yes shes a zoomer and yes shes British)

They also refuse to take out the trash because she had surgery on her knee as a kid and claims that it hurts too much, despite owning multiple bikes and a bunk bed.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
This made me so mad when I first saw it. Reminds me of AuriKatarina's mtf video, but this one is even worse somehow. Probably because of the sheer amount of lies about the poor poor "son" we have to listen and see in the first part of the video.
 
183 baras powiedział(a):
This made me so mad when I first saw it. Reminds me of AuriKatarina's mtf video, but this one is even worse somehow. Probably because of the sheer amount of lies about the poor poor "son" we have to listen and see in the first part of the video.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I have yet to see the video on an MTF, I expect horrors beyond my comprehension

Also the fact that they said they found the cat covered in shit but still sat there defending the mom and daughter pissed me off
 
KingFrampt powiedział(a):
If you've ever wanted to know what a furry pooners room looks like https://youtube.com/watch?v=eilKsKFv_GE:387 (Ignore the thumbnail yes shes a zoomer and yes shes British)

They also refuse to take out the trash because she had surgery on her knee as a kid and claims that it hurts too much, despite owning multiple bikes and a bunk bed.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
It's going to be filthy gain in less than a month. What a waste.

The only solution for that house at that point is just to burn it down.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
KingFrampt powiedział(a):
Also the fact that they said they found the cat covered in shit but still sat there defending the mom and daughter pissed me off
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Jesus, now I feel glad I ragequit the video before the cat part came up. While I understand why people like Bea do not call authorities (otherwise they'll just rot in filth silently without any change at all) in pet and child abuse cases, it makes my blood boil.
Clean your pet and clean your room, jfc.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole