EU French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu resigns after less than a month - Lecornu, a former armed forces minister, was France's fifth prime minister in under two years.

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku chiobu
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
1759755156142.png

France's Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has resigned, less than a day after his cabinet was unveiled.

"The conditions were not fulfilled for me to carry on as prime minister," Lecornu said on Monday morning, and criticised the unwillingness by political parties to reach compromises.

The Elysée palace made the announcement after Lecornu met President Emmanuel Macron for an hour on Monday morning.

The shock move comes only 26 days after Lecornu was appointed prime minister following the collapse of the previous government of François Bayrou.
Parties across the board in the National Assembly had fiercely criticised the composition of Lecornu's cabinet, which was largely unchanged from Bayrou's, and threatened to vote it down.

Several parties are clamouring for early elections and some are calling for Macron to go - although he has always said he will not stand down before his term ends in 2027.

"The only wise thing to do now is to hold elections," said Marine Le Pen of the hard-right National Rally (RN).

"The joke's gone on long enough. French people are fed up. Macron has put the country in an extremely difficult position," she added.

The decision on how to proceed now rests with Macron, who must surely be asking himself how long this political charade can be allowed to go on.

He has three options. He can appoint another prime minister. He can once again dissolve the National Assembly. Or he can resign himself.

The last is the least likely, while the first would be his natural choice.

However, who now could he name to form a government? Lecornu – the ultimate Macron loyalist – was seen as his last resort, but now he too has failed.

He could appoint a Socialist, on the basis that the left deserves a go at government - but a Socialist administration would itself not take long to fall.

So the logic must surely be for option two: for new legislative elections.

The result would probably be a rout for the pro-Macron centre, and a big victory for the hard-right of Marine Le Pen. But when every other recourse fails, few avenues remain.

Lecornu, a former armed forces minister, was France's fifth prime minister in under two years.

In his brief speech outside the Hôtel de Matignon, the prime minister's residence, which he only occupied for less than a month, Lecornu sharply criticised the "partisan appetites" of political factions, who he said "are all behaving as if they had an absolute majority".

"I was ready for compromise but all parties wanted the other party to adopt their programmes in their entirety," he said.

"It wouldn't need much for this to work," he added, saying, however, that parties needed to be more humble and "to cast some egos aside".

French politics has been highly unstable since July 2024, when Macron called for snap parliamentary elections in a bid to achieve a clear majority following a bruising loss for his party in the European Parliament vote.

Instead the elections resulted in a hung parliament divided into ideologically opposed factions deeply at odds with one another and unwilling to work together.

This has made it difficult for any prime minister to garner the necessary support to pass any bills.

Michel Barnier was appointed prime minister last September but was ousted within three months.

The government of his successor François Bayrou's too was voted down after nine months after parliament refused to back his austerity budget, which aimed to slash government spending by €44bn ($51bn; £38bn).

France's deficit reached 5.8% of its GDP in 2024 and its national debt is 114% of its GDP. That is the third highest public debt in the eurozone after Greece and Italy, and equivalent to almost €50,000 per French citizen.

Stocks fell sharply on the Paris exchange after the news of Lecornu's resignation broke on Monday morning.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewn9k0w9rxo (Archive)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
"He could appoint a Socialist, on the basis that the left deserves a go at government"
This line above, (from the article, not @chiobu's own words) is hilarious to me. "deserves a go". :story: On what basis? The only one that matters is winning an election and the French Left had to pull ever single stunt they could to keep Le Pen out.

Incidentally I saw a wonderful picture of Macron and Le Pen in the French media with the caption that this election had some very Freudian overtones - between the woman who murdered her father and the man who married is mother.

France is cooked they dont have enough money nor lenders that will lend them money
Anybody would a fool to lend money to France right now. The EU has seized billions that Russia invested in the EU and is living off the profits and there are recurrent unproven rumours that France specifically have dipped into those funds. If true that's huge. France is not at war with Russia whatever the soft-messaging has been in public discourse and the money is not theirs. The money is held by Euroclear which is an international institution with holdings globally. France outright taking Russia's invested money with them opens Euroclear up to seizures in Asian markets. Even if France hasn't dipped into the funds they're currently openly talking about building some kind of legal case that would allow them to. None of the wealthy of the Middle Eastern oil states or Asian countries will want to put their money in France if it does this. It'll flow to the USA and Asian countries. They're currently rated AA by most agencies (for what that's worth) but if I were Qatar or China or the UAE or even one of the minor players, I would not be lending money to France right now.

Q: how many French prime ministers does it take to change a lightbulb?
I'm not sure but I can think of another joke...

Q. What did the French use for light before candles?
A. Lightbulbs.
 
I recognise that this isn't exactly a hot take, but I still find it bizarre how rapidly the terms 'populist' and 'populism' entered/were astroturfed into political discourse throughout the West (or at least, Anglophone countries), and how hard tptb have been trying to attach negative connotations to the word. Any fool can see that it's never going be truly effective as a slur/scare word, because it's too close to popular, and even the dumbest of niggers will just think 'why dat foo' tryna say it be bad to be pop'lar?'. I suppose it's just another piece of evidence of our current crop of villainous overlords' being of significantly lower quality than those of the past.
But it will be very effective against "I Trust the Science"-types, the people who have learned to ignore their instincts in favor of the anointed expert class.
 
Lots and lots of people trying REALLY HARD to stop Le Pen. Completely shutting down the country and running toward a debt death spiral to stop the right? Well Qui?Qui? Qui? indeed.
 
I will be kinda shocked if we reach 2030 with the Euro still existing. The entire EU is in a fucking debt spiral that is somehow making the US debt look somewhat reasonable, if only because the USA is constantly trying to also grow the economy to account for it while Europe seems determined to destroy their own economy for no real reason other than worshiping browns.
 
I will be kinda shocked if we reach 2030 with the Euro still existing. The entire EU is in a fucking debt spiral that is somehow making the US debt look somewhat reasonable, if only because the USA is constantly trying to also grow the economy to account for it while Europe seems determined to destroy their own economy for no real reason other than worshiping browns.
They're most likely destroying it on command of China. Because several EU states are corrupt and in with China.
 
The EU has seized billions that Russia invested in the EU and is living off the profits and there are recurrent unproven rumours that France specifically have dipped into those funds
I think Russia is suing them over this in Asian financial markets . If they succeed eu and its stooges will be blocked from the Asian financial markets where they borrow from most of their money . Haven't heard an update yet about it . Knowing putin he will slowly and steadily nail the nail in the coffin that EU will need a century to undo .
 
I will be kinda shocked if we reach 2030 with the Euro still existing. The entire EU is in a fucking debt spiral that is somehow making the US debt look somewhat reasonable, if only because the USA is constantly trying to also grow the economy to account for it while Europe seems determined to destroy their own economy for no real reason other than worshiping browns.
There used to be a saying financial markets can stay insane longer than you stay solvent. I think everyone dropping them in the name of Russia, China and India will make them stay together for much longer than expected
 
I will be kinda shocked if we reach 2030 with the Euro still existing. The entire EU is in a fucking debt spiral that is somehow making the US debt look somewhat reasonable, if only because the USA is constantly trying to also grow the economy to account for it while Europe seems determined to destroy their own economy for no real reason other than worshiping browns.
EU are in a different hellhole of their own making. Way too many sandniggers sucking up free money and not contributing, but the main crippling factor is the energy. A lot of the EU went all in on net zero, cutting out coal and in some ultra faggy countries like Germany, also turned off nuclear. That left gas as one of the last remaining reliable power supplies, counting UK in this. Then of course the Russia situation kicked off, and it was decided that slav lives matter more than ours so we also lost access to the cheap gas. Energy prices spiral, industrial production collapses, you can't grow the economy to offset anything, and you're fucked.
 
A: nobody knows, light bulbs last longer than French prime ministers!
Heh. Good one.

How will this effect the export of premium French cheese?
Free Prime Minister with every wheel of Camembert!

They're most likely destroying it on command of China. Because several EU states are corrupt and in with China.
I lean towards them destroying it on behalf of Western globalists as China still wants an export market and the USA is raking in industry and capital fleeing Europe as well as becoming Europes main (legitimate) energy supplier. But whoever they're working for, it's not their citizens, agree there!

I think Russia is suing them over this in Asian financial markets . If they succeed eu and its stooges will be blocked from the Asian financial markets where they borrow from most of their money . Haven't heard an update yet about it . Knowing putin he will slowly and steadily nail the nail in the coffin that EU will need a century to undo .
Putin is the living example of "Dish best served cold." With the saddest part being that for a decade he tried hard to forge friendly relations with the West and what happened? We (the West) literally blew up a joint pipeline for fear we might buy energy from them. But regardless of the outcome of any lawfare, it's screwed over the EU for external investment - if Russia succeeds in suing them, the EU are viewed as thieves. If Russia fails, they're viewed as thieves who got away with it. I don't think many people in the West really get how this action is perceived by the rest of the world. Everyone here is in this soft mindset of "But the Russians are the bad guys, so taking their money is justified." Whilst the rest of the world who isn't watching Western media all day long just thinks "they took the money that was invested with them."

EU are in a different hellhole of their own making. Way too many sandniggers sucking up free money and not contributing, but the main crippling factor is the energy. A lot of the EU went all in on net zero, cutting out coal and in some ultra faggy countries like Germany, also turned off nuclear. That left gas as one of the last remaining reliable power supplies, counting UK in this. Then of course the Russia situation kicked off, and it was decided that slav lives matter more than ours so we also lost access to the cheap gas. Energy prices spiral, industrial production collapses, you can't grow the economy to offset anything, and you're fucked.
The one thing I'd quibble over the wording in that is the "slav lives matter" part because if there's one thing that's clear from that US statement about "fighting to the last Ukrainian" is that they meant it literally.
 
With the saddest part being that for a decade he tried hard to forge friendly relations with the West and what happened? We (the West) literally blew up a joint pipeline for fear we might buy energy from them.
The silly thing is that we had really good leverage with all the Russians parking money here in property to keep it safe. We should never assume Russia is best buddies with us but we certainly could have had a cordial wariness that would have benefitted all of us.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole