EU French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu resigns after less than a month - Lecornu, a former armed forces minister, was France's fifth prime minister in under two years.

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku chiobu
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
1759755156142.png

France's Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has resigned, less than a day after his cabinet was unveiled.

"The conditions were not fulfilled for me to carry on as prime minister," Lecornu said on Monday morning, and criticised the unwillingness by political parties to reach compromises.

The Elysée palace made the announcement after Lecornu met President Emmanuel Macron for an hour on Monday morning.

The shock move comes only 26 days after Lecornu was appointed prime minister following the collapse of the previous government of François Bayrou.
Parties across the board in the National Assembly had fiercely criticised the composition of Lecornu's cabinet, which was largely unchanged from Bayrou's, and threatened to vote it down.

Several parties are clamouring for early elections and some are calling for Macron to go - although he has always said he will not stand down before his term ends in 2027.

"The only wise thing to do now is to hold elections," said Marine Le Pen of the hard-right National Rally (RN).

"The joke's gone on long enough. French people are fed up. Macron has put the country in an extremely difficult position," she added.

The decision on how to proceed now rests with Macron, who must surely be asking himself how long this political charade can be allowed to go on.

He has three options. He can appoint another prime minister. He can once again dissolve the National Assembly. Or he can resign himself.

The last is the least likely, while the first would be his natural choice.

However, who now could he name to form a government? Lecornu – the ultimate Macron loyalist – was seen as his last resort, but now he too has failed.

He could appoint a Socialist, on the basis that the left deserves a go at government - but a Socialist administration would itself not take long to fall.

So the logic must surely be for option two: for new legislative elections.

The result would probably be a rout for the pro-Macron centre, and a big victory for the hard-right of Marine Le Pen. But when every other recourse fails, few avenues remain.

Lecornu, a former armed forces minister, was France's fifth prime minister in under two years.

In his brief speech outside the Hôtel de Matignon, the prime minister's residence, which he only occupied for less than a month, Lecornu sharply criticised the "partisan appetites" of political factions, who he said "are all behaving as if they had an absolute majority".

"I was ready for compromise but all parties wanted the other party to adopt their programmes in their entirety," he said.

"It wouldn't need much for this to work," he added, saying, however, that parties needed to be more humble and "to cast some egos aside".

French politics has been highly unstable since July 2024, when Macron called for snap parliamentary elections in a bid to achieve a clear majority following a bruising loss for his party in the European Parliament vote.

Instead the elections resulted in a hung parliament divided into ideologically opposed factions deeply at odds with one another and unwilling to work together.

This has made it difficult for any prime minister to garner the necessary support to pass any bills.

Michel Barnier was appointed prime minister last September but was ousted within three months.

The government of his successor François Bayrou's too was voted down after nine months after parliament refused to back his austerity budget, which aimed to slash government spending by €44bn ($51bn; £38bn).

France's deficit reached 5.8% of its GDP in 2024 and its national debt is 114% of its GDP. That is the third highest public debt in the eurozone after Greece and Italy, and equivalent to almost €50,000 per French citizen.

Stocks fell sharply on the Paris exchange after the news of Lecornu's resignation broke on Monday morning.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cewn9k0w9rxo (Archive)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
The result would probably be a rout for the pro-Macron centre, and a big victory for the hard-right of Marine Le Pen. But when every other recourse fails, few avenues remain.
Well gee, maybe your democracy would function better if its main purpose wasn't to suppress the will of the voters?
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
As David Starkey says, they had to redefine "democracy" so they could rebrand (and vilify) "the will of the people" as "populism."
I recognise that this isn't exactly a hot take, but I still find it bizarre how rapidly the terms 'populist' and 'populism' entered/were astroturfed into political discourse throughout the West (or at least, Anglophone countries), and how hard tptb have been trying to attach negative connotations to the word. Any fool can see that it's never going be truly effective as a slur/scare word, because it's too close to popular, and even the dumbest of niggers will just think 'why dat foo' tryna say it be bad to be pop'lar?'. I suppose it's just another piece of evidence of our current crop of villainous overlords' being of significantly lower quality than those of the past.
 
France is cooked they dont have enough money nor lenders that will lend them money to keep the gibs going both for boomers and their pensions and migrants. Unfortunately leftist dont wanna give up their plantation slaves and boomers dont wanna give up their house values and pension that pays more than they earned during their working life .

They will have to make the cuts whether like it or not
 
I recognise that this isn't exactly a hot take, but I still find it bizarre how rapidly the terms 'populist' and 'populism' entered/were astroturfed into political discourse throughout the West (or at least, Anglophone countries), and how hard tptb have been trying to attach negative connotations to the word.
They have been doing it for at least 30 years. It wasn't fast. You could find it being attached to things pushed as negative in history textbooks for decades, like when insulting non-communist pro-worker movements that pushed for advocated metal backing to currency.

It's kind of a test of a child's intelligence; if they read the negative slant applied to the word and they are smart enough to notice that's contradictory to the supposed advocacy for democracy elsewhere, they can be saved.
 
France's deficit reached 5.8% of its GDP in 2024 and its national debt is 114% of its GDP. That is the third highest public debt in the eurozone after Greece and Italy, and equivalent to almost €50,000 per French citizen.
I guess socialists find out the harsh reality of running a welfare state and universal healthcare for illegals. I don't think it would be far off to say that French citizens are below refugees and African illegals on the social hierarchy when they have to shoulder the burden of the welfare state while receiving none of the benefits (which go to hohol pigs and aliens).
i'm pretty sure the leftists in france would rather let the country burn to the ground before letting Marie Le Pen rule. Or admit their ways aren't working.
There are literal Marxist-Leninists sitting in parliament in coalition with the left-leaning socialists, and they are not few either. Do you think they would surrender peacefully when every example in history shows that when communists feel threatened, they start inciting and committing violence
 
They have been doing it for at least 30 years. It wasn't fast. You could find it being attached to things pushed as negative in history textbooks for decades, like when insulting non-communist pro-worker movements that pushed for advocated metal backing to currency.

It's kind of a test of a child's intelligence; if they read the negative slant applied to the word and they are smart enough to notice that's contradictory to the supposed advocacy for democracy elsewhere, they can be saved.
You can see that the usage of the term increased dramatically after about 2010:
Personally, I was barely aware of the term until about ten years ago, and then it suddenly seemed to be everywhere.
 
He could appoint a Socialist, on the basis that the left deserves a go at government - but a Socialist administration would itself not take long to fall.

The reason for this is that the country is in an economic crisis. A socialist administration, at best, would stand for doing nothing at all and at worst would call for increased taxes, increased spending and increased debt until the country had to be bailed out by the IMF.

The problem in France is that the largest single political group in the Parliament is RN led by Marine Le Pen. Macron keeps attempting to form governments that exclude the largest political group in the assembly. The only way to form those governments is to create political alliances composed of groups of opposite ideologies which quickly collapse.

The parliamentary crisis in France may eventually happen in a very similar way in Germany where (again) the largest party in the country is being kept out of the government by creating an unworkable right-left alliance.

They will not be able to form a functional government with the current national assembly.
New elections will only make the problem worse by increasing the number of seats held by Le Pen's party.
Presidential elections also would not solve the problem unless the candidate of Le Pen's party won them.

At a certain point, the survival of the fifth republic itself comes into question.
 
A day that ends in Y.
Next your going to tell me there are riots and Marcron was re-elected for the 17th time.
France is a stagnant black hole masquarading as some sort of entropic/dynamic political state.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole