Ed Special
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 10 Mar 2021
It definitely didn't help that, unlike the Tomcat, the 'vark never actually got good engines. If memory serves, it was stuck with radial turbines from the day it entered service until retirement, whereas the Tomcat eventually got axials, which, in addition to going a long ways towards fixing its engine flame-out issues and the resulting flat spins, weighed less for more thrust and had better fuel economy.The F-111 was definitely a cool plane and good at what it did, but the Tomcat objectively did swing-wing much better. IIRC the Tomcats had much higher readiness rates than the Aardvark (it's been a while since I read up on it, so I could be mistaken) especially with the later blocks and variants since they had all the kinks ironed out and maintenance routines fully developed. Of course, they were able to learn from many of the mistakes of the F-111 as they designed the F-14. But it's still pretty impressive what the Navy was able to do with the Tomcat, considering they had MUCH smaller areas to work on them while on a carrier compared to full on air bases with the F-111.
Still better than anything the Soviets would've put in it at the time, though.