What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

The one dog conspiracy theory I believe is that the obligatory pet microchip is testing the ground before forcing it on humans.
I think we were heading this way until biometrics tech got so good we didn't need chips anymore.
Even the UK is using gait recognition now, like something out of Little Brother.
 
Just more info if anyone is interested in dog attacks.

1759337503689.png


Year and number of dog attacks.

There's a good breakdown of each attack, the breeds that caused the attack, age and gender of victim and outcome of attack.
A lot are XL Bully or American Bully, but it was the kneejerk reaction to banning XL Bully and how quickly it happened, that was interesting. Not the first time for sure, but...something set these dogs off.

Another idea I had that may be more palatable to some, is all of the labgrown, fake meat that isn't purchased gets sent to be processed into animal feed.
 
Just more info if anyone is interested in dog attacks.

Wyświetl załącznik 7985091

Year and number of dog attacks.

There's a good breakdown of each attack, the breeds that caused the attack, age and gender of victim and outcome of attack.
A lot are XL Bully or American Bully, but it was the kneejerk reaction to banning XL Bully and how quickly it happened, that was interesting. Not the first time for sure, but...something set these dogs off.

Another idea I had that may be more palatable to some, is all of the labgrown, fake meat that isn't purchased gets sent to be processed into animal feed.
I have a question: WHO EXACTLY was attacked? What were their ages and ethnicities?
Once you start noticing the passive voice in writing, you start noticing a some weird shit.
 
I have a question: WHO EXACTLY was attacked? What were their ages and ethnicities?
Once you start noticing the passive voice in writing, you start noticing a some weird shit.
All the info is in the wiki but from memory I can only remember one non-white getting munched on and that was years before the uptick.
The ages run from kids to the elderly and everything in between. Very few similarities.
 
If you've not even bothered to read or try and understand what I've put, why even reply?

It's about killing people, not dogs.
The problem with that is that a dog isn't a magical weapon that somehow can topple the UK government.

They did ban forks and knives so banning dogs is not beyond them. But dogs don't protect you from Ackbar the muslim with an AK or even a particularly large lead pipe. As shitty as the Challanger tank was in russian mud, a dog can't do shit against it.

Making a plague to get rid of dogs is just overkill. Plus Indians love feral dogs. One can say they love them a bit too literally, and the UK is also full of Pajeets.

So you'll always have some mutt until Jeet's sexual emergencies take their toll on the poor fellow.
Just more info if anyone is interested in dog attacks.

Wyświetl załącznik 7985091

Year and number of dog attacks.

There's a good breakdown of each attack, the breeds that caused the attack, age and gender of victim and outcome of attack.
A lot are XL Bully or American Bully, but it was the kneejerk reaction to banning XL Bully and how quickly it happened, that was interesting. Not the first time for sure, but...something set these dogs off.

Another idea I had that may be more palatable to some, is all of the labgrown, fake meat that isn't purchased gets sent to be processed into animal feed.

Or, just hear me out. More niggers and browns get imported and they naturally have dog fighting rings and poor safety handling, thus there are more dog attacks. I also bet there are more car accidents, accidental fires, as well as all sort of crime since the UK became Pajeet Capital of Europe.

Just how Sweden is now the Grenade and Rape capital since they imported so many somalians and assorted nigs and durkas. The more two tier the police is, the more this will increase.
 
Another idea I had that may be more palatable to some, is all of the labgrown, fake meat that isn't purchased gets sent to be processed into animal feed.
Again, that's retarded. Lab grown meat is insanely expensive because it can currently only be produced in very small quantities - that's actually why it is a scam. It's currently physically impossible to produce cultivated meat in the quantities the venture capitalists keep promising. It requires a pharmaceutical-grade clean room facility which is difficult to achieve without contaminated bioreactors and raw food-grade amino acids in quantities that aren't currently produced on earth. The lags in this tech and the available components of the product are why companies have been promising to bring lab-grown meat to market for 20 years without any appreciable growth in this sector, despite the fact that there is consistent consumer demand for it. The whole thing is a house of cards, currently being produced in such tiny quantities that it only shows up on $500/plate tasting menus for idiots. There is absolutely no extant surplus of cultivated meat material to be secretly used in pet food. If it were to be included as an ingredient in pet food, that food would cost a premium (again, for promotion and sale to idiots). It's not happening.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Again, that's retarded. Lab grown meat is insanely expensive because it can currently only be produced in very small quantities - that's actually why it is a scam. It's currently physically impossible to produce cultivated meat in the quantities the venture capitalists keep promising. It requires a pharmaceutical-grade clean room facility which is difficult to achieve without contaminated bioreactors and raw food-grade amino acids in quantities that aren't currently produced on earth. The lags in this tech and the available components of the product are why companies have been promising to bring lab-grown meat to market for 20 years without any appreciable growth in this sector, despite the fact that there is consistent consumer demand for it. The whole thing is a house of cards, currently being produced in such tiny quantities that it only shows up on $500/plate tasting menus for idiots. There is absolutely no extant surplus of cultivated meat material to be secretly used in pet food. If it were in pet food, that food would cost a premium (again, for sale to idiots). It's not happening.

Not to mention that growing meat anywhere would have NASA and all other space agencies, and submarine operators salivating not to mention arctic researchers.

You know that the US Navy for example would be all over technology that would let their submarines lurk underwater for longer. China is working on space growing plants just to have plants, much less meat.
 
More niggers and browns get imported and they naturally have dog fighting rings and poor safety handling
In Britain specifically, our cultural imports hate dogs. You've about as much chance as Aladin or Sambo walking down the street with a dog as you have seeing them walking in the sea (I live near the coast and in my long life I have seen a handful of non-whites on a beach and never in the sea).
The problem with that is that a dog isn't a magical weapon that somehow can topple the UK government.
It a good deterrent against thieves, rapists and would-be-murderers.
Is a scam and expensive house of cards. I agree. There's other crap beyond the lab grown stuff that was pushed heavily. All that waste went somewhere and it wasn't landfills or homeless kitchens.
If it were in pet food, that food would cost a premium
Not if it was waste product or classified as waste from the process.
 
In Britain specifically, our cultural imports hate dogs. You've about as much chance as Aladin or Sambo walking down the street with a dog as you have seeing them walking in the sea (I live near the coast and in my long life I have seen a handful of non-whites on a beach and never in the sea).

It a good deterrent against thieves, rapists and would-be-murderers.

Is a scam and expensive house of cards. I agree. There's other crap beyond the lab grown stuff that was pushed heavily. All that waste went somewhere and it wasn't landfills or homeless kitchens.

Not if it was waste product or classified as waste from the process.

No its not. A dog at best can help you fight and put an axe into the hypothetical home invader. Or a sharpened billiard pole. Or you know a brick.

Dogs just help and alert you, but for that any little yappy dog will do.

Also, your culture is Indian. The UK is Indian. Your next civil war will be jeets vs muslims.

If the arabs beat the jeet, they'll just ban dogs. No need for anti-dog grey goo phage.

Turkmenistan banned dogs, it is just that easy.
If two tier stramer wasn't a retard he could just ban dogs if he wanted. He already banned knives, so he can ban everyday items.
 
because pit bulls are bull dogs bred for recreational fighting. historically bulldogs and terriers were two separate functions of dog, one was to guard your home and livestock from predators and the other was to aggressively hunt out vermin. these behavior patterns are pretty well ingrained into their genetics, my grandparents had a rat terrier and that was probably the most disgusting dog i've ever known but there wasn't a single rabbit or groundhog in a mile radius of their house. pit bulls are what happened when you mix those two together for the express purpose of making them as aggressive as possible so they fight each other so you can gamble on the outcome

imagine an animal as bloodthirsty as a terrier but with the neuroses of a guard dog. it's a bad fucking idea
That's a slippery slope to human eugenics bud.
 
No its not. A dog at best can help you fight and put an axe into the hypothetical home invader. Or a sharpened billiard pole. Or you know a brick.

Dogs just help and alert you, but for that any little yappy dog will do.

Also, your culture is Indian. The UK is Indian. Your next civil war will be jeets vs muslims.

If the arabs beat the jeet, they'll just ban dogs. No need for anti-dog grey goo phage.

Turkmenistan banned dogs, it is just that easy.
If two tier stramer wasn't a retard he could just ban dogs if he wanted. He already banned knives, so he can ban everyday items.
I don't know where you're from, but the breeds of dog in the UK could certainly maul an adult to death. Rottwielers, Dobermans, Alsations, any flavour of wolf, all dangerous animals if they need to be.

But we're getting away from the point that the next pandemic will be used to cull and ban dogs and i'll chuck in a freebie, other animals as well.
 
Go to the pitbull thread. Nigger ape with a wooden plank beats pitbull.

Now while wooden planks can be outlawed, Abdul will, gasp, ignore the law.

Mauling a defenseless old lady is not the same as a machete/club wielding darkie.
 
Yeah I know the history of the breed. I think all types of pit bulls should be banned. They serve no purpose in society and just cause trouble (and sometimes horrific injuries/death)
I just found the idea that poisoned/altered food the cause for the attacks to be ludicrous. Pit bulls are plenty aggressive as is, and the reason for the increase in Husky attacks for example is probably because they got popular during the pandemic, but few people can properly take care of a husky so they end up a neurotic mess.
guard dogs are bred for high activation threshold and high threat awareness. they will bark at anything and are too scared to do anything about it until you walk into their yard. terriers are bred for the exact opposite they see a rabbit they chase after it and murder it. in either category if you make the dog more aggressive it probably won't actually change the practical outcome of the dog's instinctual behavior. with a pit bull you're just hoping the dog isn't aggressive enough to go past an arbitrary aggression threshold that doesn't even matter with other dogs
 
guard dogs are bred for high activation threshold and high threat awareness. they will bark at anything and are too scared to do anything about it until you walk into their yard. terriers are bred for the exact opposite they see a rabbit they chase after it and murder it. in either category if you make the dog more aggressive it probably won't actually change the practical outcome of the dog's instinctual behavior. with a pit bull you're just hoping the dog isn't aggressive enough to go past an arbitrary aggression threshold that doesn't even matter with other dogs

Most terriers are not as neurotic as pits. Pitbulls maul so much because their activation treshold is extremely low. A regular terrier will not see people as prey items.

Pits maul people who don't expect it. The old lady down the street, a kid, the owner. These are not assailants who come prepared for trouble. Police dogs are trained to go after the arm, because that's where the baddie carries the weapon. If the dog can get the arm, its chances are markedly better.

The shitbull just goes apeshit and will try to murder you any way it can. It is almost beautiful, like a roided nigger or a blood crazed shark, it cares only about biting.

It is a dangerous animal. It is just that people who had been preparing to face dangerous animals often have tools that make the animal dead, even bears didn't fare well against spears, and that's why there are so few bears left in Europe. Bears are even deadlier than shitbulls due to the size. Though imagine, a shitbull the size of a bear.

Bri'ish muslims and jeets love machetes. Perhaps a smart guard dog with a lot of training would work on that, but a rabid shitbull I'm not sold on.
 
Most terriers are not as neurotic as pits. Pitbulls maul so much because their activation treshold is extremely low. A regular terrier will not see people as prey items.

Pits maul people who don't expect it. The old lady down the street, a kid, the owner. These are not assailants who come prepared for trouble. Police dogs are trained to go after the arm, because that's where the baddie carries the weapon. If the dog can get the arm, its chances are markedly better.

The shitbull just goes apeshit and will try to murder you any way it can. It is almost beautiful, like a roided nigger or a blood crazed shark, it cares only about biting.

It is a dangerous animal. It is just that people who had been preparing to face dangerous animals often have tools that make the animal dead, even bears didn't fare well against spears, and that's why there are so few bears left in Europe. Bears are even deadlier than shitbulls due to the size. Though imagine, a shitbull the size of a bear.

Bri'ish muslims and jeets love machetes. Perhaps a smart guard dog with a lot of training would work on that, but a rabid shitbull I'm not sold on.
because a terrier is like fifteen pounds tops and that type of hyper-aggressive behavior is par the course in small dogs like chihuahuas, nobody gives a shit about them because they're small and instinctively they know a human could pick them up and throw them like a football. you cross one of them with a bull mastiff and you have a dog that has the aggression and low activation threshold of a rat terrier but the dog is the size of an eight year old
 
Tales from South Africa: The South Africa Lobby that wasn't part 1
This is going to be a series of true stories from South Africa. The time period I wish to cover overall stretches from the 1960s to the present day. These stories will get into global espionage, Israel, American politics and foreign lobbies. These posts will be long and context heavy because this history is unknown to western readers. I will try to highlight the actual conspiracies and intrigue so that you can skip all the context if you want. I want to tell the story of both the conspiracies and the men aboard the sinking ship of South Africa. If there is enough interest in the topic I will make a general for these posts instead of posting them here. But for now I think this is the appropriate place.

I would first and foremost like to warn you that this post will probably be the longest of all. It will be the heaviest on context and the lightest on conspiracies. The conspiracies that will follow the events described here will only make sense in context. I hope that in doing this here, the next few posts can be a lot shorter because all of this context will be redundant. This particular post will be much less about how the apartheid system worked in practice and much more about apartheid era politics.

The Nature of the Beast:
The party of white minority rule in South Africa was the National Party, founded in 1914. Explaining the first few decades of their existence and their brief foray into power in the 1920s is not necessary for this story. It is better for our purposes to start in 1948, when the National Party obtained power that would not be lost until 1994. What needs to be understood about the year 1948 is the distinct existence of three ethno-classes. The blacks, at the bottom, inhabited the world of unskilled labour, farm labour, and mine work. The Afrikaners were relegated to the middle with agriculture, skilled labour, and small businesses, and the English occupied the top with management, ownership of conglomerates, and full control over the civil service.
This three-tier class system became extremely relevant for the National Party in 1948, both in terms of determining their platform and their shock electoral success. The Afrikaner voting demographic was seen as a cohesive alliance between farmers and labourers, both under the unhappy rule of the British. Thus, National Party policy has a number of unusual traits. Firstly, it was focused on Afrikaner advancement in the civil service and big business where the Brits dominated, and secondly, it was focused on creating Afrikaans self-rule with equality between Brits and Afrikaners. The policy of racial segregation was viewed as protective of the Afrikaner people. I am only going over this because it is relevant to what is about to follow.
Detailing their specific policies and positions would be outside of the scope of this post. But the basic thing you need to understand is that the national party achieved its goals by around 1966 in empowering the Afrikaans whites and now had to think about the best way to keep the spoils. There were two camps here. A military industrial complex camp and an intelligence glowie camp. This came to a head with prime minister B. J. Vorster, who was favourable to intelligence and psyops and had an outward looking foreign policy aimed at making friends for the increasingly unpopular apartheid regime. This series of posts will explore the shenanigans of both of these factions, starting with the intelligence faction during the days of John Vorster.

The Intelligence Faction Triumvirate:
I must add to begin with that nobody in South Africa has ever referred to these three men as the "intelligence faction". Newspapers at the time referred to them as the 'triumvirate'. Before I introduce you to the men themselves, I will tell you what these men had in common that brought them together. They were from the branch of the National Party in the north of South Africa, in other words the place where all the blacks live. Therefore, they had a much deeper appreciation for the severity of the problems in South Africa. Their opponents, the military faction, came from the Cape, where a dogmatic sense of complacency and adherence to the status quo prevailed. Not all of the individuals that will be mentioned were born in the North, however the ones that were not aligned themselves with the heavy hitters that were. A lot of the politicians from the North were therefore mavericks driven by the sense that they had a war to fight that could not be won with bullets. The triumvirate, as I will now introduce, embody this.

Hendrik Van Den Bergh: Hendrik Van Den Bergh was born in the North of South Africa in 1914. He acquired the nickname 'Tall Hendrik' for his enormous stature. If you want to get an idea for his eccentric personality you should know that during the second world war he was interned for membership in a pro German paramilitary group formed largely by returning athletes from the 1936 Olympics who were impressed by their nazi hosts. This he shared in common with John Vorster, who was the Prime Minister during his political career. Tall Hendrik was the godfather of South African intelligence. He built the entire South African intelligence apparatus. And by the 70s he headed a bureau of his own creation called the Bureau of State Security (BOSS). With the support of Vorster, van den Bergh managed to turn BOSS into one of the most ruthless and efficient bureaus in South Africa. This pissed of the military faction to no end, given that his power and his advocacy for intelligence operations over military options minimized the department of defense in the Vorster government. The event that raised his profile the most was the capture of the Russian spy Yuri Loginov. If you want one quote that sums up his career:
I have enough men to commit murder if I tell them to kill. I don't care who the prey is. These are the type of men I have.
africa-rework-the-fate-of-south-africa-part-2-v0-0esm5tav89va1.webp

Eschel Rhoodie: Rhoodie was born in 1933 in Cape Town. He began his career as a bureaucrat in the office of information. The office of information was in essence the propaganda arm of the apartheid government intended to promote South Africa's image abroad. This department was for a long time the clown in the constellation of state. Eschel Rhoodie rose through the department through the notion that South Africa was on the receiving end of an immense negative global propaganda campaign that would need to be fought with every means possible, including dirty tricks. He maintained that this had to be done covertly and over the heads of the foreign affairs ministry due to their inability to do the job. This is something to keep in mind for later. By 1972 when Rhoodie achieved the position of Secretary of the Information Department he was the outsider's outsider. He was not well connected in the Afrikaans secret societies and social circles that defined apartheid politics. He had also never held an elected position. However, vand den Bergh, the iron fist of power behind the Vorster government took a shine to the maverick Rhoodie. Both men agreed that the war for public opinion could not be won with bullets. There is a quote from Rhoodie that sums him up quite well:
In the obscure field of psychological propaganda and warfare, hypocrisy is king. No government worth its salt will admit to it. No government worth its salt is not a participant, one way or another. As Paul Blackstone of the University of South Carolina in the USA wrote, they are all involved in "the dark, obscure field of covert political warfare".
OIP.webp

Cornelius 'Connie' Mulder: Doctor Connie Mulder, born in 1925 was in the heyday of his career the 'crown prince' of the National Party. Mulder had the right disposition to be succesful in the deeply conservative and christian world of the National Party. His doctoral thesis as titled: The Influence of the Bible in the forming of the Afrikaans National Character. He cut his teeth in politics with a mayorship before moving on to a seat in parliament, where he would achieve various ministerial positions. Namely, the Ministery of the Information Department in 1968. Dr. Mulder was relatively conservative in disposition (which was a pre-requisite to achieve 'crown prince' status in the party) but had a deep pragmatic bent. Thus, he was easily persuaded by van den Bergh and Rhoodie to bolster covert international propaganda efforts through the information department. I have the least to say about him because by my account he is the least remarkable member of the triumvirate. As you will come to find out his story will be defined more by the stories of the other two. It should be said however, that Dr Mulder's enormous personal charisma and skills of persuasion helped make the schemes to follow possible.
connie-mulder-45ea1382-3b48-4f24-b4f8-99ab6d61e8c-resize-750.jpeg

By 1973 all members of the triumvirate held the positions ascribed to them in my writings and had formed their alliance towards the common goal of creating an international propaganda campaign. By 1974 Mulder and Rhoodie, having agreed on a course of action for the department of information, convinced Prime Minister Vorster to allow them to embark on a 5 year global propaganda campaign, funded by a slush fund under a secret account in the Department of Defense. Rhoodie claims that Vorster gave him and Mulder permission to conduct the campaign in any way they wished, legal or otherwise, in as much secrecy as possible. As it will turn out, having your rivals in the military faction know about the dirty tricks slush fund will prove to be a massive pain in the neck.
Vorster gave approval for this program because in his view, the department of foreign affairs had proven itself completely inadequate in reaching US officials through official means. Therefore, he was willing to try covert means. As for the secrecy, Rhoodie speculates in his book 'The Real Information Scandal' that Vorster developed a phobia for conducting covert operations in an official capacity after his secret program to arm the Biafran breakaway state was uncovered by the CIA. This is impossible for me to prove or disprove at the moment, I may look into it at another time. Regardless ,it is my first CONSPIRACY of the post.
Rhoodie sums up the program as follows:
The objectives were obvious: To try to get to the opinion formers and the decision makers in the world, to influence their stand on South Africa, to create channels of communication through which South Africa could channel its messages so that, ostensibly, the message or argument would be that of an independent individual or organisation. Politicians, Members of Parliament, religious leaders, top business people, newspapers, individual newspapermen, the anti-apartheid organisations, labour unions, student leaders — these were the targets. So was the establishment of workable links with Black Africa for I believed, intensely, that acceptance by the moderate states in Africa was the key to acceptance by the rest of the world. The place to start was the French speaking states which did not suffer from anti-White hysteria as the old English colonies of Tanzania, Nigeria and Kenya did. In addition, Dr Mulder, General Van den Bergh and I set our sights on Israel. Until Mr Vorster’s triumphant visit to Israel we three remained the only top people in the Government who believed the lot of Israel was also tied to South Africa and vice versa. Brand Fourie, on more than one occasion, tried to stop me from developing the Israeli connection.
The Methods also obvious: Persuasion. Logic. Facts. "Independent opinions" from "independent" observers. Using conferences and seminars. Books, magazines, television stations. Institutes. Newspapers. Visits to South Africa. Buying goodwill. Buying influence or space in newspapers. Advertising through front organisations. Sowing confusion among the anti-apartheid community. Setting up alternative organisations to the World Council of Churches. Getting shareholders to fight corporate disengagement. Paying out money to people so that they would not do what they intended to do.
The only consideration they had was that Barbie would be of use to them, to aid the United States in trying to find other German leaders and seek out the Communist spies in France. In obtaining arms and oil, and in fighting the anti-apartheid, anti-South African left wing brigades overseas, South Africa has, and will, continue to use methods which may be immoral in Utopia but otherwise are the right and only weapons to use against people, organisations and states who employ these methods on a massive scale to destroy our society.
R.jpg
Prime Minister John Vorster
Jesus this post took me a long LONG time to compile. I wanted to write in my section on Israel into this one but I figured that it would make the post far too long. So whenever I next get free time, I am going to explain the intelligence triumvirate and their shenanigans in Israel, everyone's favorite subject of conspiracy theories. But in the mean time I hope you found this post interesting. I know it doesn't neatly fit into the theme of the thread, but I also know that without this context the juicy shit that is to come will make no sense. So please excuse this eyesore.
 
thread tax: the indian hate is inorganic and pushed by the jew
the jew put indians in ceo chairs, the jew put indians in government offices
the jew does this to redirect inherent racist energy in a direction that looks far more different from the white than the jew does
its similar to how the jew imports muslims from the middle east to europe, while also waging war on the muslims, radicalising them. now the jew cries out that he is an ally against the muslim, which of course only became a problem because of the jew in the first place, and that the white has to support the jew against the muslim
Another idea I had that may be more palatable to some, is all of the labgrown, fake meat that isn't purchased gets sent to be processed into animal feed.
some supermarkets in the usa sell all the expired foodstuff to pig farms
that would all be fine and well, but they dont waste any manpower on unpacking the food, so the pigs eat plastic bags n shieeet
europe does it much better, we throw the food away, but feed chicken with old engine oil instead
You say that as if eugenics is a bad thing.
i fear this gonna summon the cuck, but if eugenics is good or bad heavily depends on implementation
even not marrying siblings is a form of eugenics
Most terriers are not as neurotic as pits. Pitbulls maul so much because their activation treshold is extremely low. A regular terrier will not see people as prey items.
pitbulls are just a dog-whistle for niggers right?
noone is actually concerned about dogs right?
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
because a terrier is like fifteen pounds tops and that type of hyper-aggressive behavior is par the course in small dogs like chihuahuas, nobody gives a shit about them because they're small and instinctively they know a human could pick them up and throw them like a football. you cross one of them with a bull mastiff and you have a dog that has the aggression and low activation threshold of a rat terrier but the dog is the size of an eight year old
They generally don't go randomly apeshit and maul their owners. I know terriers. They can be territorial, but they very seldom attack the owner. The shitbull can go off at random.

I had seen terriers get angry at plumbers, electricians, and all manner of handyman, but they never displayed the berserker rage of a shitbull.

pitbulls are just a dog-whistle for niggers right?
noone is actually concerned about dogs right?

No, pitbulls are considered the dog of niggers, the nigger of dogs. Like a great pairing of cheese and wine if you are French. Minorities and wiggers love pitbulls because it is "big and macho" as well as good for dog fighting.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole