Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Even if the son is brainwashed by crazy propaganda, the son probably thinks he did, if not the right thing, but a necessary evil thing.
Now let's say we are living in Sovjet Russia or Nazi Germany and your son has been listening to Radio Freedom and takes out a leading party member, do you turn him in?
I would turn in my son if he kills a child for fun, but maybe not a political murder, even if I don't agree with it and think he is brainwashed by propaganda. Not all murders are equal and motives matter.
Sorry for sperging.
it goes a step further than that
it's not just any political murder, but political murder against the same side that the family is on. the guy killed kirk for expressing standard conservative political positions. his family are conservatives themselves who most likely share most of kirks views.
kind of a "if you weren't my dad then i would slaughter you without a second thought, you fucking nazi!" situation.
is it safe to keep your son around your family under these circumstances?
should you go out of your way to protect and shield your son from law enforcement when he harbors such extreme hatred for you?
 
Already started. One is even calling for Erika to be assassinated next.
Wyświetl załącznik 7908494
A
Wyświetl załącznik 7908495
A
Wyświetl załącznik 7908497
A
Classic Leftist deflection.

>Spends years making thinly veiled threats, dehumanizing opposition, and glorifying violence against the "wrongthinkers".

>NOOO, you cant tell people to take action against us.

And of course, these posts are by a black tranny, someone who looks like they think milk is too spicy, and an old cracker.
 
I watched a YouTube video from CBS that detailed the shooter, and there were comments calling the fag a hero or saying that Kirk deserved to die, since his words resulted in the deaths of “tens of thousands of LGBTQIA+ folks, black people, and so forth.” Some of these comments were getting hundreds of likes. I used to believe that all these rage posts were from bots, but yesterday revealed to me that most of these accounts are probably real.

I hate these Marxist and liberal pieces of shit. They want you and me dead. They can suck a shotgun for all I care.
This is where the stochastic terrorism happens, these people are in a rabbit-hole of fear-mongering and radicalization, that they literally believe these things. People talk about the YouTube far right pipeline but it's a massive den of radicalization on the left. They've been groomed to see the world like this.

A while back a study asked different political groups the amount of unarmed black men killed by police, it was in the tens as far as I remember, a concerning amount of left wingers answered in the thousands or tens of thousands. These people don't live in truth they live in a dystopian fantasy, fed to them by Youtube and social media.
 
I watched a YouTube video from CBS that detailed the shooter, and there were comments calling the fag a hero or saying that Kirk deserved to die, since his words resulted in the deaths of “tens of thousands of LGBTQIA+ folks, black people, and so forth.” Some of these comments were getting hundreds of likes. I used to believe that all these rage posts were from bots, but yesterday revealed to me that most of these accounts are probably real.

I hate these Marxist and liberal pieces of shit. They want you and me dead. They can suck a shotgun for all I care.
It was the same on "Agenda Free" TV

Live comments full of unhinged hate and bile, their mods just let it happen throughout Erika's speech.

I even got timed out for calling them out (politely) on it.
 
Sorry to ask for a spoonfeed but I'm seeing groypers being talked about on normie social media, and I'm like 100 pages behind and didn't see anything relevant postmarked. There's no truth to it, right? Why groyper? Did someone notable say it? It's bizarre seeing people talking about groypers who probably didn't even know who Nick Fuentes was until now. People are so desperate to make this guy a right winger somehow it's insane. You'd think if they thought Charlie Kirk being shot was such a good thing for society they wouldn't care if one of their own did it.

Groypers aren't right-wingers anymore, if they ever were. Nicholas has told them since 2021 to hate Donald Trump, and Charlie Kirk, and JD Vance, to align themselves with leftists and Palestinians and other third-worlders.

Oh yeah, and they have been told to "rape kill and die for Nicholas J. Fuentes".
 
Unfortunately a lot of this is "Sources say" and "appears".
His family saying he was enraged by Charlie Kirk coming to the college and sperged about it, his friends saying he was a libtard who didn't like Trump or his high school classmates saying him being a redditor is how they remember him is more than enough to just admit he was a fucking lefty man it's not a big deal. Not to mention the fucking bullet casings and the usage of fucking discord to plan the gun drop.
 
Already started. One is even calling for Erika to be assassinated next.
Wyświetl załącznik 7908494
A
Wyświetl załącznik 7908495
A
Wyświetl załącznik 7908497
A
>Raven Samuelson
this profile HAS to be a joke. he must of selected “all of the above” on his systematic oppression sheet. all he needs now is jewish and disabled so he can come full circle. and of course he lives in cape town. :stress: IMG_2526.webp
 
so your average arab?

Nick Fuentes is more like a symptom of it. There's actually a lot of "ordinary looking people" who are as radical as Nick (if not more) but are just not as obvious, or not as verbally intelligent. The Republicans completely fumbling the bag as usual and not providing a candidate to represent this. Vance for example isn't just unpopular with Nick's supporters, he's just unpopular in other ways, I've seen him get dragged by rightwingers just for being fat and ugly. The psuedo-Catholicism thing Vance does isn't believable for some (the religious types), and just outright a put-off for others (the libertarian types). I think the Republicans are going to fail after Trump, Vance is just not it.

The one thing I did notice is that most of them (Nick and the others) congregate around Rush Limbaugh, Alex Jones, Pat Buchanan, and Thomas Sowell. The most common names I see thrown around within this ecosystem.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Sorry to ask for a spoonfeed but I'm seeing groypers being talked about on normie social media, and I'm like 100 pages behind and didn't see anything relevant postmarked. There's no truth to it, right? Why groyper? Did someone notable say it? It's bizarre seeing people talking about groypers who probably didn't even know who Nick Fuentes was until now. People are so desperate to make this guy a right winger somehow it's insane. You'd think if they thought Charlie Kirk being shot was such a good thing for society they wouldn't care if one of their own did it.
fuentes and kirk were beefing with each other like 7 or 8 years ago.
kirk was pro israel while nick is a massive jew hater.
that's all. there's zero substance, it's purely wishful thinking on the part of leftoids who are desperately trying to shift blame.

How common are these types of annoying progressive teachers nowadays? I don't want to be like "this is only online" but it feels like they are just a loud minority that gets a lot of attention, most teachers are usually just normie liberals
these ARE normie liberals.

"Placed with foster parents who will have them properly educated and growing up hating their parents"...

This is classically Stalinist.
remember that they want you killed, your kids raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny.
 
What's with the glowies in this thread trying to insist that he wasn't a radical leftoid faggot who was groomed on Discord?
Niggers we have DIVINE INTELLECT on this website. Go glow on Reddit
 
Does anyone have any clue as to why Josh Holmes, the host of the Ruthless Podcast, is not showing up for today's episode about Charlie?
He did half an episode yesterday offering condolences and being sad about it, like everyone. But not showing up for today's full episode dedicated to talking about Charlie, without giving any reason for it, is very weird.

I heard he and Charlie fought in the past or something? I don't know the details.
What could be the reason he's missing today. Does anyone know?
 
Some shit i have seen on the internet after Charlie Kirk was shot is beyond making a dumb comment. Over 80k people pressed like on this tweet, for them this was an acceptable thing to do.
Wyświetl załącznik 7908500

this debacle has proven beyond a shadow of doubt that a substantial number of people in this country are not only mentally unfit to engage in political discourse, but are an active hazard to the health of our society and urgently need to stop being trusted with the responsibility of participating in it
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole