Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread - Gorl Tawk's very own DMZ (De-Moidified Zone)

I’m glad that little fucker is dead.

I hope more men like him get shot in the neck as well.

If anyone wants to tut about the shame of political violence, I’ll be in the corner drinking a margarita and not giving a shit.

He actively worked to erode women’s rights and poisoned an entire generation of men. Fuck off with the we sHoUlDn’T SuPpOrT vIoLeNce bullshit, that stupid prick would have you be a slave and celebrate it, fuck him and fuck every single apologist.

If AOC had been shot, these men would openly celebrate. Remember that before you stick up for a side that doesn’t see you as human.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
i wish there where female-only ranges (no troons of course)
maybe female-only afternoons would be a start
The range I go to has a female gun club, and other ranges I'm familiar with have their own women-only clubs, teams, competitions, etc. that look very fun. Having the whole range for a day would be awesome though.

Thread tax: last time I went shooting, a man at the shotgun range shot a ground squirrel on purpose. The squirrel wasn't even killed instantly, it was injured and in pain and had to be put out of its misery by an employee. My based female relative told the guy off and reported him and he got in trouble.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
For the bit of exposure to gun culture I had, it seems incredibly male dominated. Any Kiwis in this thread owning a gun being able to share a bit more about that? I'd be interested to heat it.
It is incredibly male dominated and the unmarried women in the community are usually gun bunny pick-mes. I actually can't think of a single female guntuber or page off the top of my head that isn't some mar-a-lago faced neocon with her tits out. Plenty of male ones though. Range demographics heavily depend on your area. Where I am, it's mostly boomers. Sometimes it's parents taking their kids, new parents, or soon-to-be parents, all who genuinely want to protect their family and teach them gun safety but that's less common and they're more likely to find a quiet, out of the way area to practice than go to a range with a bunch of waddling dementia patients and USMC rejects who ignore the rules. Still mostly male though.
 
What I mean is the US is a ("first world") shithole
Only someone who's never lived in an actual shithole would say this. Being a shithole is not just "having some problems." The fact that you say "first world" in quotes is enough to assume you have no direct experience with the difference in living conditions.

When I say I don't want to live in a shithole where violence is a standard response to words, I say that as someone who was lucky enough to be born a first world citizen, like you, but who's lived over 20% of my life in various third world countries by either my own or my parents' choice. I've thankfully never been a victim of violence myself, but I know how dangerous a society that responds apathetically to violence is, and how precarious the balance between social order and chaos is. And no, the US is not there yet, but it's potentially on its way.

I hope the feds give this nutjob a judicial lynching, and I hope they do the same with every other retarded chimpanzee who wants to make Americans afraid to attend public events, speak in public, ride public transport, or generally have lives.
imagine men crying and virtue signaling over a woman who got blasted in the face who said the shit he said in reverse. "We" collectively won't do a damn thing about it and they know it.
I'm not crying over a dude I disliked and regularly made fun of for his ridiculous views and appearance. I'm not even saying you have to give a shit about political gun violence in a country you aren't a citizen of and don't live in. Hell, Charlie didn't give a shit unless the shooter was a troon, and he did live there.

I'm saying I'm not happy a dude got murdered in broad daylight for saying mean things, because I know what this means in a larger political sense, and I have skin in the game. And I know if it continues this way it's not just going to be people I dislike or "men like Charlie" dying.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
While I don't think anyone should witness their father getting assassinated, his daughter won't grow up being raised by someone who'd force her to carry a rape baby. His daughter is 3 years old, by the way.

ultimately, she will be better off without being raised by someone who would do that to her.
Seriously? He dislikes abortion so it’s better he’s dead and his children see him die and are traumatised by it? I just can’t get behind that. I doubt I’d agree with Kirk on everything but his opinions don’t warrant depriving children of their dad. They aren’t better off, no. They will be deeply affected by this and it’ll scar them for life.
 
For the bit of exposure to gun culture I had, it seems incredibly male dominated. Any Kiwis in this thread owning a gun being able to share a bit more about that? I'd be interested to heat it.
Yeah, gun ranges skew male. The female shooters that come to the local one are generally shooting with their families though there are exceptions. I recall the gun club at my uni was also majority male but there was a decent amount of women there (30-40%). Both places are/were very chill, beginner friendly and not full of tacticool tryhard faggots
 
We both know if his daughter get pregnant while minor that this guy would have drag her to the arbortion clinic himself and forced her to arbort that kid himself. Anyone who believes this guy his words i have bridge to sell you. Charlie has seen how public right wing women and girls are treated when they end up single mom's. He will personally pull that embryo with coat hanger if he has to because the other option is public shame she will never ever be able to get a proper life and a husband and be on their backs forever .

Absolutely. The truth is that statistically 90% of pro-lifers are ok with making exceptions for rape.

Despite what he said publicly, there’s a very high chance that he/his widow/his community wouldn’t begrudge Plan B for a child rape victim. After all, no one will ever know.

But they have to be ideologically consistent and hardline as it’s good for their brand, and the controversy gets attention.

Either way, her dad’s assassination makes no difference to the outcome in the unlikely and horrible event that his daughter ends up raped and pregnant aged 10.
 
Seriously? He dislikes abortion so it’s better he’s dead and his children see him die and are traumatised by it? I just can’t get behind that. I doubt I’d agree with Kirk on everything but his opinions don’t warrant depriving children of their dad. They aren’t better off, no. They will be deeply affected by this and it’ll scar them for life.
Screenshot_20250911_070245.webp


This man was advocating for public executions and for children to watch. The surrealism is off the charts.

Anyway, the lesson is be careful what you put out into the universe. Sounds like a lot of what ol' Chucky publicly said came back to him in the form of that bullet.
 
For the bit of exposure to gun culture I had, it seems incredibly male dominated. Any Kiwis in this thread owning a gun being able to share a bit more about that? I'd be interested to heat it.
In my area many ranges have classes for women and everyone is welcome to come to the range. Usually the classes are taught by a man but women-only gunclubs and classes do exist. I haven't joined any so I can't speak to how they are.
 
This man was advocating for public executions and for children to watch. The surrealism is off the charts.
I’m for public executions. The man who killed that Ukrainian girl in cold blood should be at the end of a rope, quickly, cleanly after a fair trial. Making kids watch is dumb, I don’t agree with that.but the guy just found molesting a five year old girl he snatched off the street in the uk? Rope. The guy who raped a child days after arriving on a dinghy? Rope. The woman just found butchering pregnant women and trafficking their babies across the border? Also rope. In public? Fuck it why not. If we started executing predators, women and children might be a lot safer. I am FAR less safe than o was thirty years ago, because of liberal insanity letting predators operate with impunity.
Lots of people on various sides say stuff I dont agree with. I dont agree that children should be mutilated for the trans cult, and I dont agree that abortion should be until birth. I do t agree that the water companies dump sewage where I used to swim.
If i disagree with someone I dont get to shoot their throat out in front of their kids, because that’s insane.
 
Charlie Kirk has said some very retarded/callous/baffling things. I am not and have never been a fan of his. His passing was gruesome to see simply because watching a recognizable person have their carotid vaporized before you'd even heard about the shooting is a little jarring. The people I am very sad for are his wife and children who were witness to the event and will be forever scarred. I have relevant experience (I will powerlevel no further) and IMO Kirk was dead on impact despite when they officially pronounced him dead so his suffering was 0.

I'm kind of shocked that there are women ITT that are fucking retarded enough to be celebrating this.
  1. Kirk wasn't shot for being against abortion or anything he said about women. Let's be real. This isn't some pendulum swinging against misogynistic discourse. He was almost certainly shot for being anti-trans (reports coming out now that the ammunition used to kill him had pro-trans stuff engraved on it but idk how reliable). Views that are all very commonly expressed ITT. When you say you hope "more men like him" get killed, what you're saying is that you hope more men who are vocally anti-trans get killed. If Kirk can be killed for his relatively milquetoast anti-trans takes, what do you think can happen to women with more volatile anti-trans takes?
  2. A world where political violence is commonplace or acceptable is not good for women especially. I should hope I don't have to spell out why this is the case.
  3. Kirk was willing to have a discourse with people, which is more than can be said for most political commentators. His shooting has convinced many Conservative people (men) that discourse with people who disagree with you is pointless. I shouldn't have to spell out why this is bad for American lady Kiwis. The "new Kirk" will almost assuredly be worse that Kirk.
  4. Two women (mother and daughter, son as well) saw their loved one blasted in front of them and will have malicious people (men) shoving that footage in their faces for the rest of their lives unless they go live off the grid or something. You can not care about Kirk, but his wife and children have suffered and will suffer immense psychological and emotional damage because of the actions of one shooter (man).
This is, yet again, women heading toward unsafe times because of men killing each other. You can recognize that you don't really care about someone's death while also recognizing that this will put into motion events and climates that will have far-reaching, negative impacts for women. I would have thought the collective IQ of this thread would have been higher.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I’m for public executions
Agree, but this one I must vehemently disagree with. Society as a whole is degenerate enough, the sensationalism of seeing more and more extreme acts of violence is already a blight on social media. Don't get me wrong, at some point we have to talk about death penalty again, and punishments in general must be getting harsher again because the 'comfy' trying-to-reintegrate-criminals-back-into-society approach we tried to foster since the 90s is not possible any longer. The guy who stabbed the Ukrainian girl? Put him down, no questions asked. But making a spectacle out of it is not the way, I really want to believe we are better than fucking Muslims who execute people by tossing them from a high building near the market place or make these lovely throat slitting videos for social media.
 
It’s worth remembering that we don’t actually know why Kirk was murdered yet. The assumption is because of mad shitlibs - which is not unfair, given the woke’s open desire to kill anyone who disagrees with them.

But this could be absolutely anything: a political assassination, a disgruntled stalker in love with him, a schizo who believes he’s a zombie, an attention seeker, etc.
 
This is the man-hate thread why are people caping for a man when they should be posting man-hate? If you don't want to post man-hate, you do not need to post in this thread, nobody is forcing you to. If want to cape for this man, you can go to his thread and you will find much agreement.

I don't understand why people feel the need to come to THIS thread in particular to tell us repeatedly why they DON'T hate a specific man. It seems like to me that some people are trying to make women who feel positively about a misogynist man dying perform empathy for misogynistic men.

Women are not required to empathize with misogynists. I see some people are going back and forth with women here about why they should have empathy and morals about this situation. Women don't have to do this though, we are allowed to have this opinion, even if you disagree. Women don't have to care if you think they are unempathetic and immoral.
 
This is the man-hate thread why are people caping for a man when they should be posting man-hate?
Men murder each other in front of women and children instead of using their words to resolve disagreements. Men also murder women and children to get revenge on each other, or because the woman or child made them mad. Men think having their feelings hurt justifies responding violently. Men suck for this.
It seems like to me that some people are trying to make women who feel positively about a misogynist man dying perform empathy for misogynistic men.
One (1) person said people should put themselves in Kirk's shoes. Everyone else has been expressing empathy for his wife and daughter as well as concerns about escalating male violence in society.
Women don't have to care if you think they are unempathetic and immoral.
I think the exact word used in this case was "retarded."

ETA: And it's extra retarded that you think people disagreeing with you means you're not being "allowed" to have your opinion.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Men murder each other in front of women and children instead of using their words to resolve disagreements. Men also murder women and children to get revenge on each other, or because the woman or child made them mad. Men think having their feelings hurt justifies responding violently. Men suck for this.
"Yes, but.. I'm posting man-hate now!"
One (1) person said people should put themselves in Kirk's shoes. Everyone else has been expressing empathy for his wife and daughter as well as concerns about escalating male violence in society.
"Yes, but.. people aren't caping for him THAT much!"
I think the exact word used in this case was "retarded."
"Yes, but.. those weren't the EXACT words used!"

You agree with all of my points, you just do not like that they are true, so you are attempting to minimize them. This does not make them untrue. Why did you reply to my post, when you could simply react to my post with the "Agree" sticker?
 
It’s worth remembering that we don’t actually know why Kirk was murdered yet. The assumption is because of mad shitlibs - which is not unfair, given the woke’s open desire to kill anyone who disagrees with them.

But this could be absolutely anything: a political assassination, a disgruntled stalker in love with him, a schizo who believes he’s a zombie, an attention seeker, etc.
I put my money on the husband or boyfriend of an affair partner considering almost all republican men cheat on their wifes the minute they get kids and cant leave them
 
"Yes, but.. I'm posting man-hate now!"

"Yes, but.. people aren't caping for him THAT much!"
You should read more carefully. I've been pointing the finger at men and male violence in every single post, and I haven't said a thing about the victim except that I dislike him. I just spelled it out in simpler words in the last post. If you choose to interpret posts criticizing male political violence as demanding that you feel empathy for Charlie Kirk as a human being, that's your choice, but you're the one ascribing those motivations to other people.
"Yes, but.. those weren't the EXACT words used!"
The point was that they don't even have similar meanings.
You agree with all of my points, you just do not like that they are true, so you are attempting to minimize them. This does not make them untrue. Why did you reply to my post, when you could simply react to my post with the "Agree" sticker?
I am disagreeing, I'm just trying to do so without outright slap fighting.
 
It seems like to me that some people are trying to make women who feel positively about a misogynist man dying perform empathy for misogynistic men.
I don't see anyone saying that ITT. People are rightly pointing out that Kirk being assassinated, and the circumstances surrounding that assassination, are a worrying sign that the US is sliding towards greater political unrest and violence, which is, regardless of your political leaning whatsoever

BAD

FOR

WOMEN

And this incendiary event was perpetrated by the shooter who is a

MAN

It’s worth remembering that we don’t actually know why Kirk was murdered yet. The assumption is because of mad shitlibs - which is not unfair, given the woke’s open desire to kill anyone who disagrees with them.

But this could be absolutely anything: a political assassination, a disgruntled stalker in love with him, a schizo who believes he’s a zombie, an attention seeker, etc.
Sorry I'm retarded and can't insert quotes into an edited message.

Released images from the FBI shows a college-aged guy, appears to be brown. Law enforcement has recovered the weapon and the ammunition had pro-trans and pro-antifa stuff etched into it (whatever that means). Kirk was shot while debating someone on trans shooters. I think the motives are becoming clear.

People are frothing at the mouth about it being a professional hit but without getting off-topic there are not indications that this was a professional/military/special ops/glowy hit to me.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole