Soon after the firestorm over the letter from Scorch broke, a non-furry lawyer actually was informed of it and wrote a
lengthy blog entry (
archive) detailing his legal opinions of the letter and the SovCit ideology (he is not supportive of them), and his experience with/impression of furrydom since being noticed and appreciated for his blog post. He has said he's considering attending a furry con at the behest of some furries, and if he ever makes a fursona it would be a lawyer badger who has a fixation on alcohol.
My favorite quote of his is near the end:
"Furry Sovereign Citizens do not insist that their fursonas are their actually identities, which bums me out as I was really looking forward to seeing “BOOMER THE DOG, A FREE DOG OF THE LAND” on a legal pleading at some point."
He wrote a
follow-up post (
archive) the next day focusing mainly on the professional obligation of lawyers to not mistreat or poorly serve a client because of their lifestyle choices, circumstances, or any other traits. He also defended furries as being people like everyone else, and showed off pictures furries drew for him of his prospective fursona.