- Dołączono
- 26 Paź 2024
One of the most prolific posters of homeless teen content on Pornhub actually detailed his MO when asked by a viewer. He said he would lure homeless teenagers back to his home with the promise of a hot meal and a shower, then rape them and film it. Afterwards, he would pay them $20 and let them eat and bathe. Many of these videos also fit the legal definition of child pornography. The people who film them certainly aren't asking for ID to confirm the teenage girl they're raping is over 18.Titles like "homeless teen virgin receives creampie" were mentioned and women were defending it. Women who called themselves feminist called this type of pornography "taboo fantasy" and argued that if it WAS real then the woman (teen girl) was paid and made an empowered choice to be gangraped by this roaming band of philanthropic men who want to help the homeless on the condition that they be completely vulnerable and open to degradation.
I honestly wouldn't be surprised at this point if people started defending child porn as long as the child gets paid and her parents give permission. It's the logical conclusion of "sex work is work." We let 15-year-olds pick up shifts at Burger King after school, so why not let them do porn and prostitution? Are you whorephobic or something?
