What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

I can feel that something gay and retarded is going to happen at some point...

Oh wait, it already did when you posted.
I would ask if you've noticed anything similar, but it's pointless. You can't see anything beyond your own nutsack as you suck yourself off.
At least you'll do the world the courtesy your mom never did by swallowing.
 
Hurricane Erin is acting really weird. On 9/11 a Hurricane Erin acted weird, it was suppose to hit New York, they were predicting it to hit and it just petered out and went the other way leaving clear skies that day.
From what I understand the gulf stream influences the trajectories of hurricanes and I've noticed it a lot in the past where hurricanes that hit it shift eastward. I figure if you do some cloud seeding in the right places too though then you could make them take a crazy turn. Essentially just do what you can to get a metaphorical boulder rolling down the hill to veer one way, like making a little slope. I've had ideas before about trying to kill hurricanes(I even labelled the .txt file as "THD"), but redirecting them to fizzle out over the ocean would also be a great option. I would put pictures to help illustrate any of this but the site is shitting itself.
 
From what I understand the gulf stream influences the trajectories of hurricanes and I've noticed it a lot in the past where hurricanes that hit it shift eastward. I figure if you do some cloud seeding in the right places too though then you could make them take a crazy turn. Essentially just do what you can to get a metaphorical boulder rolling down the hill to veer one way, like making a little slope. I've had ideas before about trying to kill hurricanes(I even labelled the .txt file as "THD"), but redirecting them to fizzle out over the ocean would also be a great option. I would put pictures to help illustrate any of this but the site is shitting itself.
Project Stormfury

The first ever cloud seeding experiment, 77 years ago.

They first made a half-hour run over 100 miles (175 km) long dumping 80 pounds (36 kg) of ice along the way. They backtracked then to see what the clouds had done. Next they did two mass droppings of 50 pounds (23 kg) each into one large cumulus top and orbited the cloud to see any changes. They noticed that after the first run, the cloud deck below began to break up. After the second test, the cloud top continued to grow. Satisfied with their effort, the airplanes returned to base.
Track of 1947 hurricane “King” (Unisys)
The scientists were eager to examine the storm the following day. However, when they flew to the predicted storm location, they had trouble locating the eye. After some hunting around, they found the hurricane center nearly 100 miles (160 km) west of where they expected it to be. To their astonishment, the hurricane had made a 135 degree left turn and was now moving due west. On top of that, it was strengthening! By the afternoon of the 15th, Hurricane King struck Savannah, GA. One person died in the storm surge and US$2 million in damage was done to Georgia and South Carolina.
 
Once you brown a population, there is no going back,
Italy used to have a large number of foreigners during the Roman Empire, but since they disproportionately lived in cities with low birth rates, the higher birthrate natives in the countryside eventually outbred them.

In the UK, White British have a higher birthrate than any non-predominantly Muslim group of outsiders, (that, and the first gen of migrants from Africa). If immigration stopped, demographic trends would reverse.

In the USA, the Amish and (I hate to say it) Hasidic Jews are both European with superhigh birthrate. Fundamentalist Christians and Mormons are also disproportionately White with significantly higher than average birth rates.
 
There's also Kazakhstan to look at it and its demographics. Due to Russian and then later Soviet colonization the Kazakhs had become a minority in their own homeland, but they eventually completely overturned that and have returned to being the majority. Here's some screencaps just from the linked wiki page:
Screenshot 2025-08-21 033415.webp
Screenshot 2025-08-21 033429.webp
From 32% to 71% is pretty incredible. It's not just them either, the Chechens did something similar, although they had violence involved. Down to 40~% and then up to 96%.
Screenshot 2025-08-21 033644.webp
 
Just as bad. We are fucking with neurotransmitters in a system we don’t even know how they work. We don’t know how they create emotions and feelings, and yet we are dosing people up with drugs that profoundly affect their brains and minds. They have terrible side effects. I honestly think that SSRIs are one of the things we will look back on with horror. (Also statins, and atypical antipsychotics.)
I have mixed feelings about SSRIs. I've seen both the best and worst possible outcomes from them. Very much ymmv, especially if a prescriber is a Cluster B who entered the medical field in order to get access to vulnerable people.

Speaking of the medical field, my belief is that it has a higher Cluster B population than corporate management.
 
I've seen both the best and worst possible outcomes from them
My job puts quite a lot of raw data in front of me in interesting ways. From what I have seen over the years, about 20% of people prescribed them seem to genuinely benefit. The rest seem to suffer badly, or just revert to the mean after a while. Maybe that 20% are reverting to the mean as well, I’ve never seen a follow on study that would even address that (why would you, if you have FDA approval..?)
I suspect that whatever SSRIs do chemically (who h we don’t really understand) helps a subset of people at best.
I remain convinced that outside of a few cases where chemical issues (nutritional deficiency, metabolic issues, damage from chemo etc) are the cause, you cannot medicate your way out of most mental states in a way that leaves you actually better. There may be some benefit in a short sharp shock to the system (which is probably what ket does) to give a bit of malleability to the brain so it can start to rewire in more beneficial ways.
I’m also convinced our entire modern existence depresses the fuck out of us. We are not meant to live in concrete hellscapes. We are supposed to see green, and fractal leaf patterns, and hear the water, and feel the sunshine. Traffic jams and roads and cities and deadlines and spreadsheets just kill the soul. There’s no pill for that, well there is, it’s just a pill to lobotomise you emotionally so you don’t complain too much. Happiness cannot be imposed, and deep depression is a part of being human. Add an inhuman environment and humans despair
 
My job puts quite a lot of raw data in front of me in interesting ways. From what I have seen over the years, about 20% of people prescribed them seem to genuinely benefit. The rest seem to suffer badly, or just revert to the mean after a while. Maybe that 20% are reverting to the mean as well, I’ve never seen a follow on study that would even address that (why would you, if you have FDA approval..?)
I suspect that whatever SSRIs do chemically (who h we don’t really understand) helps a subset of people at best.
I remain convinced that outside of a few cases where chemical issues (nutritional deficiency, metabolic issues, damage from chemo etc) are the cause, you cannot medicate your way out of most mental states in a way that leaves you actually better. There may be some benefit in a short sharp shock to the system (which is probably what ket does) to give a bit of malleability to the brain so it can start to rewire in more beneficial ways.
I’m also convinced our entire modern existence depresses the fuck out of us. We are not meant to live in concrete hellscapes. We are supposed to see green, and fractal leaf patterns, and hear the water, and feel the sunshine. Traffic jams and roads and cities and deadlines and spreadsheets just kill the soul. There’s no pill for that, well there is, it’s just a pill to lobotomise you emotionally so you don’t complain too much. Happiness cannot be imposed, and deep depression is a part of being human. Add an inhuman environment and humans despair
That, and in less industrialised time periods, people like myself were abandoned in the forest as changlings, and left to die so that our sad brained selves wouldn't negatively impact our tribe, or even worse, pass down our sad brains to our equally useless offspring.

Certain traits in moderation are beneficial, but in the bad old days, people who had excessive amounts of these traits were forcefully removed from the gene pool. Today it's medication and therapy when the humane thing would be advanced genetic screening and medical abortions.

Edit: a word
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
in the bad old days, people who had excessive amounts of these traits were forcefully removed from the gene pool. Today it's therapy and therapy when the humane thing would be advanced genetic screening and medical abortions.
Is there evidence of this happening on a large scale? Not to dismiss your point, which is a valid one, but I wonder how much of our modernisation has caused the sad brain problem vs it been an inherent trade within certain genes, as you would have thought if the latter was the case the sad-brain genes would have been removed generations prior.

I don't doubt people used to feel sad or depressed how could you not with the life they led. I do doubt they lacked the solutions to the sad brain problem and the issues were resolved by matter of existing.
 
From what I understand the gulf stream influences the trajectories of hurricanes and I've noticed it a lot in the past where hurricanes that hit it shift eastward. I figure if you do some cloud seeding in the right places too though then you could make them take a crazy turn. Essentially just do what you can to get a metaphorical boulder rolling down the hill to veer one way, like making a little slope. I've had ideas before about trying to kill hurricanes(I even labelled the .txt file as "THD"), but redirecting them to fizzle out over the ocean would also be a great option. I would put pictures to help illustrate any of this but the site is shitting itself.
the us military tried this in the 1960s and it didn't work. cloud seeding is vastly overblown and it only works to condense supercooled water not pop clouds that already exist. We're talking about planes dropping tons of material at high altitude every day to get it to maybe rain sometimes. it's a technology that works on a large scale and statistically is capable of increasing rainfall over a given area by like maybe 10% tops.
 
the us military tried this in the 1960s and it didn't work. cloud seeding is vastly overblown and it only works to condense supercooled water not pop clouds that already exist. We're talking about planes dropping tons of material at high altitude every day to get it to maybe rain sometimes. it's a technology that works on a large scale and statistically is capable of increasing rainfall over a given area by like maybe 10% tops.
That's why the Illuminati puts cloud seeding chemicals in every commercial airliner. Nevermind that they'd have to pay out the ass to the airlines to have them haul tons of chemicals and install sprayers in every airliner, have crews and storage for said chemicals at every airport, and somehow keep this secret. Chemtrails are totes real, I saw a TikTok about it.
 
That political and cultural discourse is heavily controlled by intelligence, just as much if not more on the "radical" fringes as in the normie core, and "radicalism" is largely a product of intelligence and designed specifically to avoid creating meaningful change. Virtually every prominent media figure is compromised, an asset, or one degree removed from an intelligence agent. The recent Tucker-vs-Fuentes spook-off is one example. I've never worked for the CIA, I don't have any family in the CIA, I don't know anyone who's ever worked for the CIA, most people I know probably don't know anyone who's worked for the CIA; the same is true for the FBI or any intelligence agency you'd care to mention. But everyone in media somehow knows somebody.


The left originally was a worker's movement. The CIA came into existence precisely to fight the U.S.S.R, which, despite having devolved into a kind of social democracy by the time of Stalin, was still viewed sympathetically by many national communist organizations. So during the 60s, musicians with radical aesthetics and mysterious sources of wealth who have managers running guns to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and who have a strange tendency to kill themselves and have people connected to them kill themselves, are telling their audiences to be sexually depraved in ways that will destroy their ability to create and maintain long-term relationships experiment with "free love" and experiment with drugs that make you detach from reality, actual CIA employees like Gloria Steinem are prancing around the world to talk about how the real problem of the world is that women aren't "represented" enough, universities subsidized by the government are churning out academics talking about how "oppression" is some abstract power produced by the intersection of race, sex, identity, ablebodiedness, and yes, of course, class -- and suddenly the "left" is empty, stripped of all real revolutionary potential because it focuses on everyone and no one, people with a job don't have the time or energy for it, and what's left is a bunch of middle-class layabouts with nothing better to do talking about how awful it is that gays and transsexuals are looked down on.

Also, I think the anti-immigrant stuff from Trump is a temporary movement from the politicians of the "right." Having a large underclass with no legal protection undercutting the cost of domestic labor and unlikely to make common cause with domestic workers is too good of a situation for elites to voluntarily surrender. I think what it's really about is testing the limits of surveillance tech and law enforcement. There's a good chance living situations for the average person are going to keep getting worse for the average man, and elites want any potential criminal or insurrectionary activity shut down quickly in areas that matter, which is why Thiel is so heavily invested into Trump's people and his company Palantir is doing as well as it is. Illegal immigrants are a perfect practice target since they don't have many legal protections, they're poor, and citizens generally don't care too much about them being arrested or spied on. But no matter what Trump does, I think there'll still probably be comparable numbers of them in the States in 5-10 years and nothing will have really changed except that there will be armed drones flying around cities authorized to shoot on sight.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Also, I think the anti-immigrant stuff from Trump is a temporary movement from the politicians of the "right." Having a large underclass with no legal protection undercutting the cost of domestic labor and unlikely to make common cause with domestic workers is too good of a situation for elites to voluntarily surrender.
And working class white voters, or actually working class in general, including black voters, who have been shat on for over a decade by wokeshit Demonrats are too valuable a demographic not to care about. So I think they will at least be trying to court that demographic, if not actually doing a good job of actually tightening immigration (Trump notoriously has done a worse job than Obama at deporting illegals largely because of his retarded clown antics throwing the whole deportation pipeline into chaos).
 
the us military tried this in the 1960s and it didn't work. cloud seeding is vastly overblown and it only works to condense supercooled water not pop clouds that already exist. We're talking about planes dropping tons of material at high altitude every day to get it to maybe rain sometimes. it's a technology that works on a large scale and statistically is capable of increasing rainfall over a given area by like maybe 10% tops.
I've had two ideas about trying to increase rainfall over an area that I wonder as to whether or not they've been tested. I figure they could beat cloudseeding in this scenario, but that's just a hunch. One is to have a sturdy enough plane strafe through rainclouds with a specialized "wick", for lack of a better term, dragging behind it. The idea being that instead of trying to push the aggregation of water into droplets via chemical means to do it via mechanical means as the wick serves as a nucleating point and if it's designed right(imagine something more like the pic I'll post below) then it can concentrate water into it and then provide a somewhat steady stream of water. Imagine this kind of thing but with more solid cloth and then ropes at the end that serve as the "wick" portion that allow water to stream down and way.
Prawn_Drag_Net_Dimensions_480x480.webp

The other idea is similar but utilizing electric charges to cause water droplets to rapidly adhere to the trailing device before being pulled off by the wind to fall down. This kind of tech works on fog and so should work in rain clouds. Here's a nice video on YouTube of a guy making his own DIY device to do this on fog:
His video is based on work from MIT that shows that you can use high voltage DC currents to quickly coagulate water from the air into liquid water.

Either of these concepts would require very sturdy vessels and you obviously wouldn't want to really have a fleet of fuel guzzling planes doing this on a hurricane. Instead you'd want swarms of cheaper drones that can withstand it all and be easily collected after they get ejected from the hurricane.
 
And working class white voters, or actually working class in general, including black voters, who have been shat on for over a decade by wokeshit Demonrats are too valuable a demographic not to care about. So I think they will at least be trying to court that demographic, if not actually doing a good job of actually tightening immigration (Trump notoriously has done a worse job than Obama at deporting illegals largely because of his retarded clown antics throwing the whole deportation pipeline into chaos).

No, the working class isn't a "valuable demographic" in electoral politics. The two parties in America didn't just forget to appeal to the majority of the country, and countries which once upon a time had a working-class party (like Labour in the UK) didn't just forget their history and accidentally switch to representing the numerically much smaller upper-middle class. Politicians don't compete for votes in the sense of pure numbers so much as they compete for the slimmest majority of votes they can get to win. There's a limited number of candidates and you never make it onto the field without money. To even be a politician in any race that matters, you have to sell yourself to a billionaire or faction of elites before you've made your first campaign promise. Joe Blow from Nebraska may have a great policy idea, but his neighbors aren't voting for him because that vote will be a waste; instead they'll vote for Asmodeus (D) or Azazel (R) because they got on the CNN or Fox primary debate. As it turns out, Asmodeus and Azazel agree on many things. Stated things they agree on are that we need to prepare to have a war with China, we need to send more money to Israel, and we need to help America's company invest more into AI. Unstated things they agree on are that tax rates at the top will never go back to what they were pre-Reagan, that unemployment needs to be kept high to depress labor costs, and because they're both invested heavily in real estate, they have an interest in housing prices being high. But now that the two candidates have been selected, the working class is now graciously offered a voice in choosing between them. So Azazel might make certain promises to gain an edge over his competition at this point, like releasing Epstein files, arresting Asmodeus, or building a wall, but he can literally not do any of that because the only real consequence to not doing it is that people will vote Baphomet (D) next election cycle, and Baphomet is also planning to break his promises. But even that worst-case scenario isn't particularly likely: because the working class knows it doesn't make much difference for it which of the preselected candidates are chosen, partisan allegiance is treated as something like a religion or football allegiance, something meant to be reflexively identified with rather than thought about as something having serious consequences, so most people who bother to vote just vote for their party no matter what.

Another way of saying it is that politics is an instrument of class rule. The ruling class is where it's at because there's a working class at the bottom, and this has been the arrangement for the entire history of liberal republicanism (and longer, obviously). The working class is the people who are ruled, not the people the political establishment was created to serve. Any "courting" of the working class happens in promises only, or with issues inconsequential to people who actually matter (like which bathrooms transsexuals get to use). That's why I doubt there's any plan to actually stop illegal immigration, unless a fun surprise is in the works involving citizens getting bused out and forced to pick fruit for $3.75 an hour.

Also, terrorizing illegals and making an example out of some periodically has the effect of disciplining them so they don't make too much trouble at work or agitate for civil rights.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
There's a "weeks where decades happen" moment coming and everyone on some deep subconscious level feels it.
Sure thing, bud. I'm sure your vague prediction without a timeframe is going to happen at some point.

My gut feeling is that the World is going to change dramatically by the year 2030~2035, and if you're religious like me, you might also feel that biblical events might start happening then also. The World has been steadily reaching a tipping point for the past couple decades, akin to the fall of the Roman empire or the World Wars, as if it's being prepared for something, either divinely or conspiratorially.
 
That the United Kingdom is being sold to Qatar and Saudi Arabia so that their elite can have a nice European retreat along with an entry way into European politics. I get advertisements for "Halal Property" in the UK with the tagline often being "Sharia real estate available in the United Kingdom!"

Living in the Middle East is such an eye opener.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole