AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities

[harbringer883]

Wyświetl załącznik 7780355

OH NO, WHAT WOULD I EVER DO IF @chucklebot314 BLOCKS ME, OH NO.

Wyświetl załącznik 7794627
what am i looking at, exactly?

Is that AI lmao?

 

[Gas Snake]

https://bsky.app/profile/tobyvenables.bsky.social/post/3ltonfm4ksc2b

https://archive.ph/YfyUC

Wyświetl załącznik 7792459

There's a taco bell near where I live that has a robot taking drive-thru orders and it... works perfectly fine actually. It understands as well as the average zoomer and even handles corrections.

Yeah fast food jobs are cooked. In 5 years, your average fast food place will be drive-thru only and have exactly 1 employee staffed at a time.

 

[mr. testicular torsion]

Is that AI lmao?

i think its a half assed attempt at a picasso esque painting with ibis paint's AI Disturbance thing

 

[AnOminous]

There's a taco bell near where I live that has a robot taking drive-thru orders and it... works perfectly fine actually. It understands as well as the average zoomer and even handles corrections.

Yeah but do you speak English? There's a certain demographic that will be all wubba wubba bix nood muhfugga nigga nigga gnome sayin bix NOOD beeyotch! I'd like the see the machine try to handle that.

 

[Coolio55]

Yeah fast food jobs are cooked. In 5 years, your average fast food place will be drive-thru only and have exactly 1 employee staffed at a time.

Fucking depressing. Giant blow to the "urban demographic" and contributing to the shrinking pool of jobs where you can get fucked up while on-shift.
I bet that they'll keep the food prices sky-high too.

 

[Islam Karimov]

You don't know that. An AI artist might have years of traditional art training and the whole reason they get to be a paid AI artist is the culmination of all their skills, allowing them to turn out high quality work quickly. Maybe they CAN draw just fine. And who knows, maybe the digital artist gets endlessly frustrated without access to layers or undo, they've become so reliant on conveniences that they have a hard time with traditional art.

Either way, it's an entirely different medium. If you take away a guitarist's guitar, is he automatically amazing at singing or piano playing? There are plenty of people who are good at playing a specific instrument but probably can't make music on their own for shit. They're just really good at following sheet music in their particular area of expertise.

I know for sure that most of the AI art is made by jeets with 0 artistic taste.
Behold, what your average artist with years of traditional art training using AI to show off the culmination of all their skills:

0:06

For some reason jeets seem to be obsessed with AI, as the other guy complaining about the jeets flooding his website with ghiblAI pictures.

0:30

They absolutely love to use it to represent their deities, but this seems to be more of a third world behavior than specifically an indian one, as shown here:

0:05

But yeah, sadly the twitter trannies never encounter this kind of content, probably because they proliferate on an other side of the internet. I wonder how they would react to this for instance:

0:05

But yeah, having the internet flooded with even more brainrot trash is totally worth it because it makes some trannies on twitter seethe I guess. I say that, because while these kind of retarded videos are hilarious to watch, you're not laughing when otherwise useful platforms like pinterest or images search engines are inundated with AI trash instead of the actual content you're looking for.
Anyway, I don't even hate AI in itself, in fact I use it daily, but I feel its used to enshitify the internet to a step further. Everything is flooded with low effort AI generated shit, from newsarticles to imageboard posts, even fucking job offers are AI generated now.
This is the world we live in now.

 

[Runch]

I know for sure that most of the AI art is made by jeets with 0 artistic taste.
Behold, what your average artist with years of traditional art training using AI to show off the culmination of all their skills:

That's a different argument from the one I was making in that four-month-old post.

Like I said, it's not some kind of "own" that taking away someone's computer removes their ability to do AI art, because taking away a guitarist's guitar could also remove their ability to make music. We can't necessarily assume they're a good singer or pianist. A lot of things require a specific tool to do, and you're not automatically lesser just for relying on a tool.

You're lesser if you make shit, like the jeets you mention. Like how the internet has been just as flooded with random shitty photography since its inception, too, because that's also an easy medium.

Youtube was flooded with pregnant Elsa Spiderman dentist videos long before AI. I know AI makes it easier, but it's also easy to criticize shitty media. People were sick of selfies and Instagram food photos and didn't say "man I hate photography for enabling this."

 

[Colon capital V]

But yeah, having the internet flooded with even more brainrot trash is totally worth it because it makes some trannies on twitter seethe I guess.

Flooding the Internet with more brainrot trash to make twitter trannies seethe and dilate:

Besides I rather live in a world where anyone can make slop freely than retard artists pissing and shitting to the gubbermint that AI needs to be heckin' regulated and controlled like water. Former isn't the best but infinitely better than the latter.

 

[Islam Karimov]

That's a different argument from the one I was making in that four-month-old post.

Like I said, it's not some kind of "own" that taking away someone's computer removes their ability to do AI art, because taking away a guitarist's guitar could also remove their ability to make music. We can't necessarily assume they're a good singer or pianist. A lot of things require a specific tool to do, and you're not automatically lesser just for relying on a tool.

You're lesser if you make shit, like the jeets you mention. Like how the internet has been just as flooded with random shitty photography since its inception, too, because that's also an easy medium.

Youtube was flooded with pregnant Elsa Spiderman dentist videos long before AI. I know AI makes it easier, but it's also easy to criticize shitty media. People were sick of selfies and Instagram food photos and didn't say "man I hate photography for enabling this."

It's probably an issue of miscommunication, because whenever someone talks about AI art, I think about art that was only made with AI (or with very little human intervention besides the prompt), basically prompt art.
It's very different than a skilled artist using AI to sped up the process. The latter isn't that different than using photobashing tbh, but with more flexibility, and without having to waste years on rapidly depreciating image search engines to get what you want.

Anyway, something more funny than the usual tranny ragefits:

"Chat Yipiti"

 

[linchan]

There are rumors that AI is being used to automatically upscale shorts. With this screenshot from a Reddit post as evidence

 

[Outer Space Traveller]

They absolutely love to use it to represent their deities, but this seems to be more of a third world behavior than specifically an indian one, as shown here:

But yeah, sadly the twitter trannies never encounter this kind of content, probably because they proliferate on an other side of the internet. I wonder how they would react to this for instance:

Why is Jesus Christ being eaten by Satan, and Donald Trump putting Him through ground? I'm highly confused, not really offended.

It comes to no surprise Jeets are bugmen, so they have no creativity save for 1 in every... I don't know? 1,000,000?

 

[Islam Karimov]

Why is Jesus Christ being eaten by Satan, and Donald Trump putting Him through ground? I'm highly confused, not really offended.

It comes to no surprise Jeets are bugmen, so they have no creativity save for 1 in every... I don't know? 1,000,000?

It's engagement bait, the AI generated swarthochad is asking the 2 digits IQ spic boomers to spread the cancer (like, comment and share) if they love Jesus and want to help him. It works surprisingly well, I'm sure a lot of tiktok revenue has been gained through such endeavors. But since the competition is harsh, the "prompt artists" have to constantly one-up each other in terms of absurdity and retardation.
These videos are my guilty pleasures, and I also love how you have AI brainrot for every religion. I found bouddhist and islamic ones aswell. The most hilarious are the Jesus ones though, especially for kind of these unmatched gems :
Would be funny to post these kind of videos under some anti AI trannys posts lol, if he gets mad you call him racist to further his meltdown

Also found these but I don't think it was made for religious purposes

 

[ArtisinalAmma]

I remember someone posting a python tool hosted on Github that allows you to turn the awkward, off-grid pixel art of AI tools into the actual stuff. Could a kind Kiwi repost this? I can't hunt it down again.

 

[behindyourightnow]

Found this delightful AiDS thread while looking for something else on Bluesky:



I have so many questions, the most important being:

- Do these people think that when a "bubble collapses" it always means the industry just disappears entirely? Like do they think that after the "dot com bubble" and the "housing bubble" there was no tech or housing industry ever again?

- Why would anyone currently hyping AI feel the need to "come crawling back with their tail between their legs"? Like even if you assume the worst-case scenario and a tech bro gets completely financially and professionally ruined, why would he feel the need to be personally forgiven by this poster (who seems to be an unemployed cat lady), or anyone on Bluesky? Very weird.

Go into the replies and you kind of get an answer: This isn't really about AI, they're caught up in a strange cope fantasy about a future in which everything suddenly gets better, they attain unlimited social power, and get to see their enemies punished:




And once again, these people seem to genuinely think that the end of an "AI bubble" means that all AI will disappear.



You hear that? If NVIDIA's stock price goes down and AI venture capital dries up, all generative AI models will break forever. Even if you're running an LLM on your own computer, it'll just vanish, and no one will ever be able to make one again. And then all the tech bros will cry on TV and apologize to furry artists, and no one will ever make fun of people on Bluesky ever again.

 

[Magnum Magazine]

I remember someone posting a python tool hosted on Github that allows you to turn the awkward, off-grid pixel art of AI tools into the actual stuff. Could a kind Kiwi repost this? I can't hunt it down again.

Here brother, it's the link in this post.

AI pixel art really cooks traditional pixel art more than most kinds of art.

It's not usable out of the box because AI is inherently noisy, the pixels will be at slightly different sizes and colors will not adhere to a limited palette. But then you use this tool on it, with very cool methodology for how it works, and you're golden.

AI pixel art doesn't get details wrong in obvious ways like it does for more complex art. It's hard to argue that one pixel might be out of place or uncanny somehow, and also hard to argue that the result was "done wrong." What aspect of a little 16x32 character could be a tell that it wasn't handmade? ChatGPT yellowing, I guess? Just don't use fucking ChatGPT.

 

[FILTH Tourist]

Here brother, it's the link in this post.

That thing looks amazing and exactly the tool I need right now!

 

[Runch]

You may remember Lavender Towne from her earlier video where she gleefully poisons her art to destroy AI forever, using tools long debunked that they were doing anything useful at all.

Now she is coping about the fact that people made a LoRA of her art, to generate works similar to hers.

Several points from her video:

"No you stupid AI people, don't you know that LoRAs are different and not affected by Nightshade? Man, you'd think you'd know your own technology!" This is the flip and reverse where she pretends she knew all along that you could make LoRAs of her "poisoned" art without any difficulty, despite spending multiple videos giving her audience the false hope that they could use her techniques to protect their art from being stolen. She lied to all of her viewers because "sticking it to AI" is a hot topic.

"I always knew Glazing my art was pointless, because I have years of art already available which isn't poisoned so I'm already fucked, but you kids can still protect yourselves!" Cope. Glaze does nothing, Nightshade does nothing. If they ever did anything, they don't anymore because they attacked an outdated method of training AI.

"Lol this LoRA is garbage and does a terrible job at replicating my art style!" Oh ok, so you should be perfectly fine with it then, right? Your style is safe, your job is safe. No one would ever mistake your art for the AI's art, right? The only question any artist needs to answer is this: would you breathe a sigh of relief to see AI of that quality level replicating your art (good, bad, whatever you think of it), or do you think she should feel violated to see it capturing even a little of her essence? If you feel like she should be mad, then you know she's lying again.

"The AI bros tried to make a LoRA from my poisoned art but must've gotten bad results due to the poisoning, because the LoRA looks like my old art style which was unprotected, so it wasn't an accurate test." ...But you just got done saying that Nightshade which you used doesn't protect against LoRAs, so why would it matter? And you also said that it looked terrible, but now you say it accurately looks like your older art?

"Dood there's this awesome anti-scraper tool that traps AI scrapers forever in a loop!" More lying to her audience. The most basic scraper bots have been able to detect this, halt, and move on for decades. There are plenty of poorly designed/experimental sites that do similar things unintentionally. The very first time you check the results from your scraping and see that you were on one site for 10 hours and got nothing of substance, you patch it so that doesn't happen again.

 

[Slurred]

You hear that? If NVIDIA's stock price goes down and AI venture capital dries up, all generative AI models will break forever. Even if you're running an LLM on your own computer, it'll just vanish, and no one will ever be able to make one again. And then all the tech bros will cry on TV and apologize to furry artists, and no one will ever make fun of people on Bluesky ever again.

Nuclear cope.

Back when the first public Stable Diffusion model was released, a bunch of artists on ArtStation were replacing their entire galleries with NoAI pictures in an attempt to thwart the AI. I think a lot of them still believe that generative AI does data scraping in real time, during image generation. That's why they get so excited about "model collapse". Probably the thinking is that once the Internet fills up with enough Glazed art and slop, the AI will stop being able to generate coherent images.

Most of these people have no concept of the difference between training and inference or the difference between online services and local models.

 

[Inco G. Nito]

Most of these people have no concept of the difference between training and inference or the difference between online services and local models.

None of these people have any idea what AI image generation actually is, looks like, how it works, or what it is capable of. You mention something as simple and obvious like "Of course that would be a feature" as inpainting and they just look at you with a dead eyed retard stare. It's a shame because real talented artists are getting swept up in this anti AI stupidity and being held back for it.

 

[Aero the Alcoholic Bat]

And once again, these people seem to genuinely think that the end of an "AI bubble" means that all AI will disappear.

There was the video game crash of 1983, and the dot-com bubble of 1999 and 2000, and both videogames and the internet died as a concept and didn't become bigger than ever before.

Nope.