For the criminal charge, sure, but how will Balldo’s billion dollar civil suit play out? My naive assumption is that “Kayla” needs to convince a jury to assign a dollar value to the emotional harm or reputational damage that resulted from the Toe’s caddish disregard of milady’s modesty. That seems much less of a slam dunk to me.
If true, Kurt should consider investing in an E-Ink monitor. Boox makes one, and I know there are some others.
Everyone in those quotes and replies are nearly as vitriolic because it was someone wishing some who was pro Karen Read to kill themselves while dragging the name of a beloved deceased Lawtuber Legal Vices through the mud. No one took kindly to that.
Oh, fair - I haven't looked into the civil standards (THANKS for the research project - I can't not look into it now, even though it is objectively a waste of my time
).
Ghoul
This shit looks AI too
He descends lower but that's normal.
Yet so entertaining to watch
There are three general issues with eink displays:
Same, and I don't think it's fanfic. The man came out in defense of Chaney. #neverforget
Is that the lawyer who hired her after she ditched Nick for being a disgusting, filthy, drug addled faggot pervert?
Can Nick eliminate a monetary judgment against him by bankruptcy? Assuming for argument that Montagraph wins, Nick is ordered to pay damages and/or legal fees. But you can't squeeze blood from a stone. Would it just hang over Nick's head, perpetually draining him of any income? Or would Montagraph have to keep pursuing Nick for non-payment? All this would be amusing content. Imagine having Montagraph in your life for the rest of your life because you were drunk one and lied and refused to ever retract or apologize. That's comedy right there.
And he picked her.
This is something that I struggle with. Nick is a vile, despicable drug abuser. He is verbally abusive, and sexually degenerate. He allegedly has physically abused his kids and wife. He publicly humiliates his wife and family on a daily base and seems genuinely unrepentant. Beyond actual murderers. rapists, or child molesters, Nick may be one of the worst lolcows on this site.
probably not impactful at all but perhaps indicative of how much (little) rendazza cares about these filings/this case.
Not for an intentional tort like libel with malice.
Or Nick just didn't tell him. In any event he did a no-show on a scheduled hearing that would have been the time to schedule a hearing on the only motion currently before the court (the patently bogus anti-SLAPP claim).
The joker painting and frame look like he spent $25 at Wal-Mart