🐮 Lolcow Andrew Peter Carlson / Anaiah Carlson / Tamarlover / Xtamarlover - Jewish/Christian Wannabe Cult Leader, Stalker, Ugly af, dogfucker, mayor of spitsville

More than one of Tamar lives in Virginia with the same name.

<div style="color: #000;"><br><table width="350" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" cellpadding="1" border="0" cellspacing="0" style="background-color: white; text-align: center;"><tr><td style="background-color: #0066B3; color: white; font: 16px/1.1 Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">HowManyOfMe.com</td></tr><tr><td style="border: 1px solid black;"><table width="100%" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0" style="background-color: white; text-align: center;"><tr><td width="120" style="padding-top: 2px;"><a href="http://howmanyofme.com" style="text-decoration: none;"><img src="http://extimg.howmanyofme.com/extimages/howmany-logo.png" alt="Logo" width="100" height="100" style="border: 1px black"></a></td><td><span style="font: 16px/1.1 Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #000;">There are<br><img src="http://extimg.howmanyofme.com/autoimg/J05HrJJwRyI1extqWIT17w,,/count.png" alt="238"><br> people with <span id="hmpu">my name</span> in the U.S.A.</span><br></td></tr></table><a style="color: #0066B3; text-decoration: underline; font: bold 16px/1.8 Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" href="http://howmanyofme.com">How many have your name?</a></td></tr></table><br></div>
Your Pseudo-Jewish Cyber-Sorcery won't work on this site.
 
Plus I don't know what's going to happen with these potential court things. So I'm just going to wait and see. If nothing bad happens in like 1 month from now, then maybe I'll be able to think about the possibility of looking for a job.

What "potential court things" do you need to worry about if you haven't breached the order of protection?
 
What "potential court things" do you need to worry about if you haven't breached the order of protection?

They might claim I have broken the protective order. While I don't think I have unambiguously intentionally violated it, perhaps I did unbeknownst to me. Furthermore, I am keeping track of her lawsuits. There's currently a lawsuit she brought against me. So I'm keeping updated on the case until I see for certain that it is dismissed like I expect it to be. Similarly with her $150,000 lawsuit I'll be keeping an eye out to see when the case is filed and waiting to see when it will be dismissed like I expect it to be as well.
 
Your Pseudo-Jewish Cyber-Sorcery won't work on this site.
if the forums actually did accept arbitrary html, i would be interested to see what kind of xss he would attempt.

obviously he knows what that is because he has clearly stated that he is an intelligent person who knows how to find out where we live and all.

$('.messageText > a').hover(function() {
$(this).attr('href', 'www.super-secret-hacker-website.net/scripts/get_ip.php');
});
 
If I deem it advantageous and not immoral to violate the law, I will do so.
Yeah no. Your biggest problem is that you simply don't get that there's a shitload of things in life you don't get to decide. You don't get to decide if violating the law is acceptable or not, it never is. You don't get to decide if someone owes you something or not. You don't get to decide if someone else's personal feelings matter or not. Whether you like it or not, this is a direct symptom of your autism, and you should see a therapist to learn how to properly cope with your mental disability if you don't plan on spending an extended amount of time in jail.

I know you'll dismiss this, but I'm throwing it out there regardless.

I'm not offended, they can stay. I was just trying to be nice to her and avoid false implications that the tags inclusions indicate.
"Stalking a girl for a decade is okay, but please lay off with the tags everyone !"
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Yeah no. Your biggest problem is that you simply don't get that there's a shitload of things in life you don't get to decide. You don't get to decide if violating the law is acceptable or not, it never is. You don't get to decide if someone owes you something or not. You don't get to decide if someone else's personal feelings matter or not. Whether you like it or not, this is a direct symptom of your autism, and you should see a therapist to learn how to properly cope with your mental disability if you don't plan on spending an extended amount of time in jail.

I know you'll dismiss this, but I'm throwing it out there regardless.


"Stalking a girl for a decade is okay, but please lay off with the tags everyone !"

"You don't get to decide if violating the law is acceptable or not, it never is." By that one statement right there, you have justified ever horrible government authorized atrocity which was legally sanctioned. Such as the holocaust, etc. Furthermore, the entire concept of America's liberty and for that matter the origin of many countries known to exist was one which broke away illegally from their origin country. And we have islamic countries that have crazy laws which if you violate you'll be killed and such. Your view that the people do not get to decide if violating the law is acceptable or not is ludicrous. It is one of the most immoral and disturbing things you could ever subscribe to. By your definition, women and black people should never have disobeyed the law for the sake of getting rights. It shows you are the maniac.
 
They might claim I have broken the protective order. While I don't think I have unambiguously intentionally violated it, perhaps I did unbeknownst to me. Furthermore, I am keeping track of her lawsuits. There's currently a lawsuit she brought against me. So I'm keeping updated on the case until I see for certain that it is dismissed like I expect it to be. Similarly with her $150,000 lawsuit I'll be keeping an eye out to see when the case is filed and waiting to see when it will be dismissed like I expect it to be as well.

Pretty sure keeping tabs on her violates the restraining order
 
"You don't get to decide if violating the law is acceptable or not, it never is." By that one statement right there, you have justified ever horrible government authorized atrocity which was legally sanctioned. Such as the holocaust, etc. Furthermore, the entire concept of America's liberty and for that matter the origin of many countries known to exist was one which broke away illegally from their origin country. And we have islamic countries that have crazy laws which if you violate you'll be killed and such. Your view that the people do not get to decide if violating the law is acceptable or not is ludicrous. It is one of the most immoral and disturbing things you could ever subscribe to. By your definition, women and black people should never have disobeyed the law for the sake of getting rights. It shows you are the maniac.
You're trying to find a moral equivalence that doesn't exist. An entitled stalker refusing to take no for an answer and willfully disregarding the law isn't the same as oppressed people rebelling against an unjust rule. Drawing a comparison between the two is quite autistic.

And I'm not saying that to spite you. It's literally autistic.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole