🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[Universal Balance]

I was typing paragraphs of unhinged Hate towards Destiny, Kyla and Darius but I should stop shitting up the thread, so I’ll just say:

I hope Darius gets hit by a truck, Erudite gets HPV and has her shit leaked one day by worm-dick and that Steven dies alone and in pain.

I agree with you, and for the same reason I felt conflicted about @Universal Balance 's post urging Pxie to compartmentalize her emotions and adopt a methodical approach

When she is on the stand she can get emotional, but it has to be calculated. Meth-Quasimodo will be trying to knock her off balance so she says the stupid shit that she thinks impresses people on the internet. She has to rinse and repeat these points:

I trusted him because he portrayed himself as a champion of enthusiastic consent online and in our social circles.

I trusted him because he was experienced with this lifestyle and sending videos around like this and I wasnt. I thought he better understood the risks than me.

I trusted him because I told him I wanted to keep this a secret and he assured me it would be.

I trusted him because I thought he was my friend. This blinded me to all the evidence that in hindsight should have indicated I not trust him with this.

She can get emotional about all that. But she cant go off on diatribes about drinking water and whatever other bullshit. MethSTIny’s sex pest defence force are trying to paint the picture thay Pxie should have seen this coming, Destiny has been dropping this since this started, he’s trying to angle the forseeability in his favour, she needs to counter that.

 

[Kyla Turner]

Everything in Destiny's life is simply a show to get more pussy, most people don't believe me, but it's true.
If I tell you that Destiny genuinely only spent months reading on Israel/Palestine, or Jan 6th to be able to attract more women to fuck you would call me deranged/crazy, but it's the truth, he doesn't care about politics at all, never has, never will.

I don't dissagree with your take, at the moment I am agnostic as to whether or not Tiny has political beliefs. Its possible that he is pretending to hold most and/or all of his political positions.

Suppose a footsoldier asks you- If the desire for more female sexual partners is what primarily motivates tiny to utter apparent political beliefs, then why isn't most of his content about topics that mostly women are interested in like horseback riding or feminism (whatever that means)?

I don't know why, but I can vivdly imagine a footsoldier asking you the question above if they saw your post.

 

[SocDem_Incel]

I don't dissagree with your take, at the moment I am agnostic as to whether or not Tiny has political beliefs. Its possible that he is pretending to hold most and/or all of his political positions.

the only reason I think he has political beliefs is that he seems to have cared about politics prior to being a huge content creator, and I doubt he used politics to get pussy at that point in time. I doubt he cares on an emotional level, but I feel like he finds politics interesting the same way most people would follow a fictional story or something. He also genuinly hates people who he perceives as stupid that oppose him, so when he expresses outrage at people with different political positions I think the anger is real, he just lies about the reasoning.

btw I still think he changes the positions that he's open about depending on the environment, and even grifts from time to time. i just disagree with the notion that he isn't interested in politics.

 

[Netwatch]

I don't dissagree with your take, at the moment I am agnostic as to whether or not Tiny has political beliefs. Its possible that he is pretending to hold most and/or all of his political positions.

If you look at his political beliefs over the years they have remained shockingly consistent across the board. Typically if you have real political positions they tend to change over time, but Tiny has remained rock solid on what he preaches, which leads me to believe that he doesn't have any political beliefs at all. He wants to be seen as this paragon of political thought where he says something and never changes his opinions on that thing, but that just isn't how real people actually work.

 

[StrangerMe]

I don't dissagree with your take, at the moment I am agnostic as to whether or not Tiny has political beliefs. Its possible that he is pretending to hold most and/or all of his political positions.

Suppose a footsoldier asks you- If the desire for more female sexual partners is what primarily motivates tiny to utter apparent political beliefs, then why isn't most of his content about topics that mostly women are interested in like horseback riding or feminism (whatever that means)?

I don't know why, but I can vivdly imagine a footsoldier asking you the question above if they saw your post.

He likes the mental stimulation of arguing politics, he just doesn't believe in any of it.
That's why he gets triggered when someone rightfully points out that he only debates to "win". He genuinely doesn't understand what people mean when they tell him that, or acts stupid about it, but it's very clear what they mean.
The words coming out of his mouth are simply points that he memorized, and he doesn't care at all whether "x" or "y" policy comes into effect, he couldn't care less whether Israel gets blown up tomorrow, contrasting that, if Israel were to nuke Gaza tomorrow, his mortal enemy, Hasan, might genuinely have a stroke on stream.

Destiny doesn't believe in anything, and in fact, I don't even know if he knows what it's like to believe in anything, I genuinely do not even know if I consider him to be sentient (not exaggerating, I believe that his molested mind is so beyond fucked that the only times when he comes into anything close to self awareness is post mushroom trips, when he's having a mental breakdown about how much of a piece of shit he is).


Destiny, often (in recent years) goes on stream and says something a long the lines of "I don't think you guys even like women" or something like that, when he sees of slightly misogynistic meme on twitter or his chat, however, this is a recent "act" of his, Destiny can't stand women at all, he will play pretend and listen to gossip or personal stories of women in his little discord or in VCs but it's coming through one ear and going straight out of the other side.
That's why a girl who he's sexting with him can tell him that she was gang raped and he will completely forget about it a day later, he's not paying attention in the slightest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpRULjszHSo

Destiny's actual opinion on women. If he only engaged in women topics he would have to put up with them all day, everyday, when he can't stand them. He just uses them for sex, he pretty much admits in the video that he only puts up with them because they have tits and a vagina.

doubt he cares on an emotional level, but I feel like he finds politics interesting the same way most people would follow a fictional story or something. He also genuinly hates people who he perceives as stupid that oppose him, so when he expresses outrage at people with different political positions I think the anger is real, he just lies about the reasoning.

THIS. It's just like playing a game, or reading a book to him, his interest is nothing more than watching a team sport.

i just disagree with the notion that he isn't interested in politics.

The problem is that Destiny doesn't know what it means to actually care about anything, he will tell you that he's the only political commentator that cares about politics (he talks about that dumb Sam Seder and Ben Shapiro (?) dream that he had years ago to make his point about this), when in reality he's one of the fakest, hobby driven, political commentators that there is.

His interest in politics is nothing more than a team game, that also gets him pussy while not having to talk to women to do it.

 

[Anime afficionado]

I think that he only holds political opinions created from an ego driven desire to be "right". However, this doesn't translate to actually having any consistent principles or actual values/belief in the things he's talking about but rather a performative desire to present as the "smartest" person in the room.

Note that Tiny started to get more notoriety for his engagements with politics when he was debating right wingers constantly in 2016/2017/2018. Of course the people he was debating were the dumbest right-wing grifters online at the time so it was low hanging fruit for him to easily appear correct and smarter.

But this was more an exercise in feeding his ego and "winning" in front of his audience rather an actual genuine belief in wanting to counter growing alt right narratives online. We know that wasn't the case because he later cozied up to Lauren Southern and Nick Fuentes despite going hard on Southern in past debates.

It's also why he got embarrassed and memed on hard after the Finkelstein debate, because Tiny so badly wanted to come off as a super smart "serious" dude but Finkelstein chose not to engage with him as a serious participant at all, which caused Tiny to crash out lol. All he cares about is the appearance of "winning"

 

[PointWreckster]

Any lawyers or legal nerds have an idea why Destiny in his chat after the evidentiary hearing was confident the case will still be dismissed on summary judgement?

He said it's because "they" (Pxie I'm assuming) "admitted the Abby evidence is a lie".

But unless Pxie literally said some shit like "I colluded with Abby to make the whole thing up" or something similar there is nothing she could have said during that hearing that makes Abby's evidence inadmissible. It would have to be an extreme admission of collusion for Abby's evidence to even be considered inadmissible.

Right?

Like her evidence is independent of anything Pxie could have said during that hearing.

Her affidavit is absolutely still admissible evidence and that means the case survives a summary judgement. Because any dispute of fact based on admissible evidence means it must go to trial.

Unless I'm missing something, he's saying it just to get his chat further on his side.

Because I highly doubt his lawyers are telling him "it's over, we won, summary judgement gets this dismissed".

If they are, and that's why he's confident, I'm struggling to see why they would be saying that.

 

[chilly like a villy]

@PointWreckster your first mistake was believing anything a meth head says.

I recommend reading from the leaks onward - there's a highlight feature you can click through to see notable posts, rather than every comment about tiny being ugly and fat (which he is).

From Feb 2025, destiny has been making predictions about this case which are continually proven wrong. He lied to Pxie and Chaeiry that they had nothing to worry about. Destiny has made it clear that he needs to win in the court of public opinion because the worst that happens to him legally is he loses a bunch of money. He is currently highlighting his right to lie as free speech (and it is) as long as it isn't under oath.

Then decide for yourself why he might tell the people who make him money that everything is gonna be ok. His audience is also more invested in his success because they need to believe that a rat person, like them, can make it in this world. Destiny has 0 incentive to be truthful, apologetic, or humble.

I also find it funny that he's back to beating the summary judgement drum after admitting that it's not even on the table right now. I'm starting to think it's not just a cope for his audience but for himself. He often fantasizes about "when this is over" and what he's gonna do.

ETA: I also hope Abby knows that Darius does not care one iota about her. I hope, if she's decided to disappear from the lawsuit, that she made the choice for her own reason and not because an NPC with a diseased dick pressured her.

 

[cmzng]

He’s just holding out hope discovery won’t yield the needed artifact that he did in fact send a link or piece of media that affirms Abby’s affidavit. As he already said he’s planning to mitigate any discovery he possibly can hence deleting his messages, projecting that pxie et al will withhold as he is trying to(because that’s fair in his mind), and why he said he hopefully doesn’t have to wait for summary judgment until discovery ends.

He could easily release his DMs with Abby if he knows what’s in them and could easily explain why she would think he leaked links or errata that Abby would mistakenly think was of or containing pxie, but he won’t because it’s “gross” to defend himself.

 

[PointWreckster]

@PointWreckster your first mistake was believing anything a meth head says.

I recommend reading from the leaks onward - there's a highlight feature you can click through to see notable posts, rather than every comment about tiny being ugly and fat (which he is).

From Feb 2025, destiny has been making predictions about this case which are continually proven wrong. He lied to Pxie and Chaeiry that they had nothing to worry about. Destiny has made it clear that he needs to win in the court of public opinion because the worst that happens to him legally is he loses a bunch of money. He is currently highlighting his right to lie as free speech (and it is) as long as it isn't under oath.

Then decide for yourself why he might tell the people who make him money that everything is gonna be ok. His audience is also more invested in his success because they need to believe that a rat person, like them, can make it in this world. Destiny has 0 incentive to be truthful, apologetic, or humble.

I also find it funny that he's back to beating the summary judgement drum after admitting that it's not even on the table right now. I'm starting to think it's not just a cope for his audience but for himself. He often fantasizes about "when this is over" and what he's gonna do.

ETA: I also hope Abby knows that Darius does not care one iota about her. I hope, if she's decided to disappear from the lawsuit, that she made the choice for her own reason and not because an NPC with a diseased dick pressured her.

I agree, I think his strategy is just a PR one. What I believe he's trying to do is condition his audience that he was a victim of the system when he's forced to settle. He's going to say some shit like "the fact this didn't get dismissed during SJ is one of the most ridiculous injustices I've seen". And DGG can then go all around the internet saying, "Pxie literally had no evidence, Abby lied, she had no videos or anything, the fact it didn't get dismissed means the courts are corrupt, he had to settle."

Also, I'm not too familiar with the Darius stuff.

Is there evidence he in any way pressured Abby to "disappear" from the suit on behalf of Destiny? If there is....that's literally a felony I think.

He’s just holding out hope discovery won’t yield the needed artifact that he did in fact send a link or piece of media that affirms Abby’s affidavit. As he already said he’s planning to mitigate any discovery he possibly can hence deleting his messages, projecting that pxie et al will withhold as he is trying to(because that’s fair in his mind), and why he said he hopefully doesn’t have to wait for summary judgment until discovery ends.

He could easily release his DMs with Abby if he knows what’s in them and could easily explain why she would think he leaked links or errata that Abby would mistakenly think was of or containing pxie, but he won’t because it’s “gross” to defend himself.

But what I'm saying (again, could be wrong) is that even if they don't yield a link or piece of media, its still admissible and goes to trial.

Because the affidavit alone creates a disputed issue of fact.

I mean, if they do get media and links to corroborate her affidavit, the more the merrier. But that would just make it more likely she wins at trial.

But it should still get to trial, even if no links or media turn up.

And this is all under the assumption no other evidence will turn up. Pxie's team issued any subpoenas yet of Abby/Destiny discord messages?

 

[chilly like a villy]

Spoiler: Casual witness intimidation

I'm going through and gathering through. This is their first conversation I will update with the second. link to vod on Darius' channel

Spoiler: HUGE IMAGES

Wyświetl załącznik 7404118
Wyświetl załącznik 7404117
Wyświetl załącznik 7404116

Tldr of first combo, Darius is encouraging her (allegedly on behalf of DGG) to stop the lawsuit and contact Destiny for private hush money.
I already downloaded the entire VOD (get fucked destiny) but I'm not really an advanced clipper so I'm going to hold off unless the vod gets taken down before someone else gets to it.

EDIT: also the messages read from the bottom up

EDIT2: Here is the second conversation, it ended up being pretty short.

Spoiler: MoreBigImage

Wyświetl załącznik 7404131

Fun bonus points, right after this Darius switched over to gooning to some random instagram chick
Wyświetl załącznik 7404130
BTW in the above images Darius and his crew were yucking it up while a RAPE victim was expressing her confusion and distress in light of being outed to thousands of people ALL WHILE they are further exposing her. The only small grace is they're so STUPID they don't realize the grand irony in what they are doing. This is honestly sick. The dregs of dgg. Pray for the girly pops now in their hour of need.

Why yes! Enjoy the entire DM screenshot by @WebFelching or go watch the Darius stream. I just did a post about this but can't reply to it.

Highlights:

And this is all under the assumption no other evidence will turn up. Pxie's team issued any subpoenas yet of Abby/Destiny discord messages?

@SchizoNerd420 just made a great post about tiny's efforts to subpoena Abby, check it out. We don't know what Pxie's team have asked for except that tiny says they wanted 5 years worth of logs and he said he'd die first before surrendering them.

 

[Anime afficionado]

But what I'm saying (again, could be wrong) is that even if they don't yield a link or piece of media, its still admissible and goes to trial.

Because the affidavit alone creates a disputed issue of fact.

I mean, if they do get media and links to corroborate her affidavit, the more the merrier. But that would just make it more likely she wins at trial.

But it should still get to trial, even if no links or media turn up.

And this is all under the assumption no other evidence will turn up. Pxie's team issued any subpoenas yet of Abby/Destiny discord messages?

What's revealed in Discovery as that process unfolds is often the predictor of whether a case will proceed all the way to trial. Depending on what happens, it's pretty common after to have negotiations on how to settle out of court, etc. That doesn't mean a move for dismissal will be granted or that it won't go to trial of an agreement to settle out of court isn't made.

As for the witness statements it's up to the court/jury to determine if a witnesses' statement!or testimony can be considered credible or not, not destiny. We only have Destiny's word that it's a "lie". A case isn't just dismissed automatically because the defendant claims a specific piece of evidence is a "lie".

Destiny has also said multiple times that this case would be dismissed already. Destiny has no idea what he's talking about. He's not just suddenly a legal "expert" in the same way how he was a dating expert, an Israel/Palestine expert etc. previously lol

 

[Code Cave]

Unless I'm missing something, he's saying it just to get his chat further on his side.

Congratulations, you are not missing something. It's all a performance, his heart isn't even in it anymore.

Worth looking over what Abby is actually claiming again:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111.49.2.pdf

It's pretty short, but lets walk through the key points:
Abby claims Destiny sent her a google drive link of him and Pxie. Abby recognized Pxie in the video:

Abby messaged a friend in 2023 (over a year before the leaks/anyone knew 100% that Pxie and Destiny had slept together) saying she had seen a video of Pxie and a "video" (black screen + audio) of Chaeiry:

Destiny has wiped his messages with Abby, including the link she claims had the video of Pxie:

Abby is saying this under penalty of perjury.

At no point does Abby claim to have a copy of the video or anything. Destiny is consistently misrepresenting what Abby says. He claims he never sent the video of Pxie because he ctrl + F'd his logs with Abby and he never mentioned Pxie when he sent the videos, by that logic he also never sent it to Rose. If Pxie's team do get the logs from Destiny, it will probably just show Destiny sending random google drive links. My guess is that Destiny would then have to prove that the link he shared didn't include the video of Pxie at the specific time he shared it. Iirc, other women have claimed that Destiny just had a massive open folder with a bunch of videos in it, so he legitimately might not even have realized Pxie was in there.

 

[PointWreckster]

Why yes! Enjoy the entire DM screenshot by @WebFelching or go watch the Darius stream. I just did a post about this but can't reply to it.

So....Darius showed his DM's with Abby on his stream? That seems....not intelligent.

Also, when people here are talking about Abby and whether she "disappeared" from the case, what do they mean?

Was she supposed to be added as a plaintiff to Pxie's case? If she was, what indication do we have that she is no longer willing to be added?

Or do we mean she is going to revoke her affidavit? Because like i said before, even if she revokes, her affidavit is still on the record evidence and is still admissible. But, if she does revoke, Pxie and her team should absolutely subpoena Darius, Destiny, Abby, to get them all on the record if they pressured her in any way to revoke it.

Congratulations, you are not missing something. It's all a performance, his heart isn't even in it anymore.

Worth looking over what Abby is actually claiming again:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111/gov.uscourts.flsd.684111.49.2.pdf

It's pretty short, but lets walk through the key points:
Abby claims Destiny sent her a google drive link of him and Pxie. Abby recognized Pxie in the video:
Wyświetl załącznik 7524047
Abby messaged a friend in 2023 (over a year before the leaks/anyone knew 100% that Pxie and Destiny had slept together) saying she had seen a video of Pxie and a "video" (black screen + audio) of Chaeiry:
Wyświetl załącznik 7524051
Destiny has wiped his messages with Abby, including the link she claims had the video of Pxie:
Wyświetl załącznik 7524061
Abby is saying this under penalty of perjury.

At no point does Abby claim to have a copy of the video or anything. Destiny is consistently misrepresenting what Abby says. He claims he never sent the video of Pxie because he ctrl + F'd his logs with Abby and he never mentioned Pxie when he sent the videos, by that logic he also never sent it to Rose. If Pxie's team do get the logs from Destiny, it will probably just show Destiny sending random google drive links. My guess is that Destiny would then have to prove that the link he shared didn't include the video of Pxie at the specific time he shared it. Iirc, other women have claimed that Destiny just had a massive open folder with a bunch of videos in it, so he legitimately might not even have realized Pxie was in there.

Yeah, I mean, her affidavit even without logs is a strong affidavit. So, Destiny claiming this affidavit is "bullshit" or a "lie" is just wrong. It's not hearsay in the slightest. It's admissible evidence that creates a factual dispute that a jury will need to decide on at a trial. So this suit as it stands (meaning, even if no more evidence turns up), and I'm wondering anyone disagrees with me, will make its way to trial. And that is the last thing Destiny wants and will be very eager to settle.

 

[Solar]

6k viewers for AE. A lot of kick chatters commenting on how boring it is. The chat is very slow for 6k viewers. Is this usual for his podcast?
It wouldn’t be surprising if he started viewbotting after the court case blew up.
Destiny has to control public perception and paint the “everything’s fine” narrative so people continue to work with him.

 

[Sodom And Gomorrah]

1:44

debating has always been a sport for him - he tells on himself in the last part of this clip here

will make its way to trial. And that is the last thing Destiny wants and will be very eager to settle.

I agree her affadavit is very strong, and coupled with potential spoliation from destiny could potentially lead to the 'adverse inference instruction' to the jury where they are allowed to assume the worst. (no idea the likelihood of any of this, not a lawyer, just a retard)

As it sits now, destiny and his lawyers are trying their hardest to get AbbyMC's affidavit completely thrown out/stricken from the record by any means necessary, we just have to wait and see if their tone changes if their efforts get denied.

 

[A. G. Peak]

New filing on the docket.

Defendant Steven K. Bonnell’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Have June 3rd, 2025 Evidentiary Hearing Transcript Filed Under Seal

Spoiler: Document 101

GPT-4.1 Summary:

This is Steven K. Bonnell II’s (the defendant’s) formal legal response opposing Jane Doe’s (the plaintiff’s) attempt to have the entire transcript of the June 3, 2025, court hearing sealed (i.e., kept secret from the public).

Key Points from Bonnell's Opposition:

1. Public Hearings Are Presumed to Be Public

• Bonnell’s legal team argues that court hearings are meant to be public unless there is a very good, specific reason to keep something secret.
• Jane Doe is asking to seal the entire transcript of the hearing, even though:
  • The hearing was public (ordinary people were present and discussed it online afterward).
  • She did not ask for anything to be kept confidential during the hearing itself.

2. Plaintiff Did Not Identify Any Confidential Information

• Jane Doe’s motion did not point to any specific lines or passages in the transcript that were supposedly sensitive or private.
• She did not offer any evidence or concrete reason as to how public access to the transcript would harm her.

3. Plaintiff Has Publicly Discussed the Case Herself

• Bonnell’s team points out that Jane Doe herself has discussed the case openly online, including on Substack, social media, and crowdfunding sites.
• She has shared details about the case and court proceedings with the public.
• Bonnell’s lawyers argue that this undermines her case for secrecy now.

4. No Procedural or Legal Basis for Secrecy Here

• The motion to seal does not meet the requirements for such requests (for example, identifying specific content and explaining why only that content should be concealed).
• The law requires a high standard and narrow justification for sealing anything, and especially for sealing entire documents.
• Jane Doe did not attempt to close the hearing or request confidentiality at the time, so the request for secrecy after-the-fact is “waived” (basically, she missed her chance).

5. No Legal Support in the Statutes Cited

• Jane Doe’s reference to 15 U.S.C. § 6851 (a federal statute about nonconsensual intimate images) does not, according to Bonnell’s team, actually give the court power to seal records or override public access.

6. Third Parties’ Privacy Not at Issue

• Jane Doe’s sealing request attempts to cite the privacy of unnamed witnesses, but those people have not requested protection, and no supporting evidence from them has been submitted.

BOTTOM LINE / CONCLUSION

Bonnell’s lawyers argue that because Jane Doe did not make a timely or specific request to keep things secret at the hearing, has discussed the case herself publicly, and hasn’t provided concrete reasons for secrecy, there is absolutely no legal justification to seal the hearing transcript. They ask the court to deny her request in its entirety.

 

[Madone]

I can already picture Destiny mockingly reading out the part where Pxie is crying while aggressively interrogated by Bill Cosby’s lawyer about the times Destiny (consent king) nonconsensually distributed her sextape like candies so she contemplated killing herself.

All while DGGers are clapping along while somehow still convincing themselves that Destiny is the real victim and Pxie is actually the bad guy here

 

[Handsome and Cool]

Steven "Destiny" Bonnell II linking directly to the evil doxxing murderous "Kiwi Farms" in his offline chat!


RustleSearch | archive

Link to video (JF Gariepy): https://uploads.kiwifarms.st/data/video/5374/5374993-9c78033c810b7165e45bd6a06fd8a13d.mp4

 

[SchizoNerd420]

Defendant Steven K. Bonnell’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Have June 3rd, 2025 Evidentiary Hearing Transcript Filed Under Seal

"Multiple individuals unaffiliated with the parties were present in the courtroom gallery, some of whom took contemporaneous notes and later published detailed summaries online." Lol, yes, one of those "unaffiliated individuals" is an active member of DGG who took notes for the sole purpose of immediately going on Darius and Destiny's streams to mock Pxie. Of course, they are just going to omit that little tidbit.

Also the evidence that there are "detailed summaries [of the hearing] online"? Apparently, just this: https://spilled.gg/pxie-admits-cour...deos-ex-boyfriend-without-destinys-knowledge/. Hardly a "detailed summary." I'm not even convinced this Riley Fox person was at the hearing, and isn't just basing his "reporting" on Destiny's own summary of what happened.

Edit: Actually, you know what, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say a real person didn't even write this article. It reads like some AI bot produced it.

Double Edit (oh my): Sorry, but I just need to point out how dishonest this is from Destiny's team. The actual citation is "See, e.g., https://spilled.gg/pxie-admits-court-sharing-intimate-videos-ex-boyfriend-withoutdestinys-knowledge/." The "e.g.," there indicates there are other examples. What are the other examples? This is the strongest example of people talking about the hearing online they could find? An article virtually nobody has read, which I'm convinced is just a poorly written recap of Destiny's own summary of the hearing, attached to a twitter account with *checks notes* 12 followers. They must have really scoured the internet to find this to try and support their argument that the content of the hearing is already all out there. I guess it might look bad if they pointed out that the actual examples of people talking about the hearing online are hardly unaffiliated, they all originate from Destiny's own community, and they are all just relentlessly ridiculing Pxie.